Comments on: Weeping & Gnashing of Teeth http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/ Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM) Sun, 27 May 2012 02:24:49 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Dr Cakanic - Cosmetic Dentist http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-2649786 Dr Cakanic - Cosmetic Dentist Sat, 28 Aug 2010 20:55:15 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-2649786 Totally awesome write-up. I recently spotted your blog and needed to say that I’ve really really enjoyed exploring your posts. In fact I’ll be opting-in on your feed. Totally awesome write-up. I recently spotted your blog and needed to say that I’ve really really enjoyed exploring your posts. In fact I’ll be opting-in on your feed.

]]> By: Carlos http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-185086 Carlos Tue, 13 Jun 2006 23:37:35 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-185086 Actually, in court people (I think) are usually found "guilty" or "not guilty", and "not guilty" is quite different from "innocent". Jesus was innocent. My personal opinion was that Simpson was "guilty", but he was found "not guilty" by a jury of his (supposed) peers, yet found liable in civil court for damages for the deaths of his wife and her friend. His "not guilty" hardly made him "innocent". All that being said, I really have doubts Rove was guilty as charged in the media, and would find it extremely hard to believe Fitzgerald would come out and say that point-blank. Fitzgerald would lose whatever credibility he still has (if any) if he said as much. Actually, in court people (I think) are usually found “guilty” or “not guilty”, and “not guilty” is quite different from “innocent”.

Jesus was innocent. My personal opinion was that Simpson was “guilty”, but he was found “not guilty” by a jury of his (supposed) peers, yet found liable in civil court for damages for the deaths of his wife and her friend. His “not guilty” hardly made him “innocent”.

All that being said, I really have doubts Rove was guilty as charged in the media, and would find it extremely hard to believe Fitzgerald would come out and say that point-blank. Fitzgerald would lose whatever credibility he still has (if any) if he said as much.

]]> By: Gary Gross http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-183592 Gary Gross Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:54:11 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-183592 Let's examine this logically. The burden on a prosecutor for an indictment is much less than the burden for a conviction. If you can't even get an indictment, you definitely can't get a conviction. That's the definition of innocent. Let’s examine this logically. The burden on a prosecutor for an indictment is much less than the burden for a conviction. If you can’t even get an indictment, you definitely can’t get a conviction. That’s the definition of innocent.

]]> By: Matthew http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-183352 Matthew Tue, 13 Jun 2006 21:32:50 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-183352 Gary, you who are so legally minded should know that just because you can't or don't indict someone it doesn't mean that they aren't guilty. Unless further details are forthcoming, it could mean that they felt they didn't have enough evidence for a solid conviction. That said, he may in fact be innnocent. I was just saying I thought it odd that no more details were given that would help clear the air. Try being a little less combative, it might help your blood pressure problem. Gary, you who are so legally minded should know that just because you can’t or don’t indict someone it doesn’t mean that they aren’t guilty. Unless further details are forthcoming, it could mean that they felt they didn’t have enough evidence for a solid conviction. That said, he may in fact be innnocent. I was just saying I thought it odd that no more details were given that would help clear the air. Try being a little less combative, it might help your blood pressure problem.

]]> By: Gary Gross http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-182474 Gary Gross Tue, 13 Jun 2006 20:10:07 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-182474 <blockquote>They said they weren’t going to indict him, they didn’t actually come out and say the evidence proves him innocent...</blockquote> If they can't even indict someone, then they aren't guilty. PERIOD. Parse it any way you like but it still comes up the same way: Karl Rove IS <b></i>INNOCENT!!!</b></i> Get over it!!!

They said they weren’t going to indict him, they didn’t actually come out and say the evidence proves him innocent…

If they can’t even indict someone, then they aren’t guilty. PERIOD. Parse it any way you like but it still comes up the same way: Karl Rove IS INNOCENT!!! Get over it!!!

]]> By: Matthew http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-181889 Matthew Tue, 13 Jun 2006 19:02:30 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-181889 I think the wording is interesting. They said they weren't going to indict him, they didn't actually come out and say the evidence proves him innocent which is what I would have expected them to do with such a high profile person. Call me jaded but after listening to enough politicians, my first thought isn't "He's innocent" but "A deal has been made". I think the wording is interesting. They said they weren’t going to indict him, they didn’t actually come out and say the evidence proves him innocent which is what I would have expected them to do with such a high profile person. Call me jaded but after listening to enough politicians, my first thought isn’t “He’s innocent” but “A deal has been made”.

]]> By: Assorted Babble by Suzie http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-181705 Assorted Babble by Suzie Tue, 13 Jun 2006 17:55:47 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-181705 <strong>Cleared and No Charges for Karl Rove</strong> Another bad day or should I say week for liberals, boo hoo!! (smiling) President Bush's Adviser Karl Rove will not be indicted or charged in the "Valerie Plame Case." Oh let us not forget the liberal media has to report it with their teeth grindi ..... Cleared and No Charges for Karl Rove

Another bad day or should I say week for liberals, boo hoo!! (smiling) President Bush’s Adviser Karl Rove will not be indicted or charged in the “Valerie Plame Case.” Oh let us not forget the liberal media has to report it with their teeth grindi …..

]]> By: Scott in CA http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-181522 Scott in CA Tue, 13 Jun 2006 16:54:23 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-181522 No! Let Wilson file his civil suit. If he does, then he will finally be required to prove, in a court of law, what he CANNOT prove, i.e. that his wife was "covert" and her name was "leaked" by someone in the Administration. Even her alledged "covert" status some years before the "leak" has been challenged by others who know what "covert" means. Wilson will lose his case and be exposed as the liar he has always been. No! Let Wilson file his civil suit. If he does, then he will finally be required to prove, in a court of law, what he CANNOT prove, i.e. that his wife was “covert” and her name was “leaked” by someone in the Administration. Even her alledged “covert” status some years before the “leak” has been challenged by others who know what “covert” means. Wilson will lose his case and be exposed as the liar he has always been.

]]> By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-181507 Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:48:41 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-181507 <strong>Rove Won't Be Charged in CIA Leak Case</strong> Top White House aide Karl Rove has been told by prosecutors he won't be charged with any crimes in t Rove Won’t Be Charged in CIA Leak Case

Top White House aide Karl Rove has been told by prosecutors he won’t be charged with any crimes in t

]]> By: Carlos http://www.californiaconservative.org/w/weeping-gnashing-of-teeth/comment-page-1/#comment-181496 Carlos Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:32:37 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3288#comment-181496 Had a friend once who said there's nobody innocent - it's just they haven't been caught or charged with whatever it is they've really done. OK, so Rove didn't do this, and the moonbats are going crazy. I suppose that makes up for the treason that Tubby, Dingy, Chucky et al haven't been charged with... Had a friend once who said there’s nobody innocent - it’s just they haven’t been caught or charged with whatever it is they’ve really done.

OK, so Rove didn’t do this, and the moonbats are going crazy. I suppose that makes up for the treason that Tubby, Dingy, Chucky et al haven’t been charged with…

]]>