Wrong-Headed Thinking By Baker’s Bureaucrats
This year’s prime example of bureaucratic wrong-headed thinking, aka the Baker Commission report, will be made public this December. This year, like in all other years, Democrats will fawn all over the report while pushing for acceptance of all its recommendations. The White House should reject these recommendations because they’re defeatism disguised as ‘realism’. David Sanger’s article lists a number of interesting insights into the report.
A draft report on strategies for Iraq, which will be debated here by a bipartisan commission beginning Monday, urges an aggressive regional diplomatic initiative that includes direct talks with Iran and Syria but sets no timetables for a military withdrawal, according to officials who have seen all or parts of the document.
As I’ve written before, direct talks with Syria and Iran shouldn’t be held because (a) they aren’t interested in stabilizing the region and (b) because they won’t keep their word. Diplomacy is only useful when dealing with honest people. Otherwise, it’s an exercise that’s designed to impress the ‘world community’, which is meaningless. It seems to me that holding direct talks with Iran and/or Syria only legitimates them. Instead of playing nice in public, we should be putting them on notice that their financing the terrorists and insurgents in Iraq won’t be tolerated.
In interviews, several officials said announcing a major withdrawal was the only way to persuade the government of Iraq’s prime minister, Nouri al-Maliki, to focus on creating an effective Iraqi military force. Several commission members, including some Democrats, are discussing proposals that call for a declaration that within a specified period of time, perhaps as short as a year, a significant number of American troops should be withdrawn, regardless of whether the Iraqi government’s forces are declared ready to defend the country.
Announcing a Coalition pullout will just undermine security in Iraq. It also undercuts the efforts of brave Iraqi patriots who’ve stuck their necks out against the terrorists and the insurgents in their quest for freedom. Tips to security forces will dry up. Violence will increase. Insurgents’ and terrorists’ actions will become more bold. In fact, the insurgents and terrorists have already become more bold.
Aside from the policy aspects of the Baker-Hamilton Commission’s report, which are awful enough, it should be seen as utterly immoral to abandon a nation after telling them that you’d help them become a democracy. But ‘realists’ like Chuck Hagel, Joe Biden, Jim Baker and John Kerry don’t care about behaving in a morally disgusting manner. Their only consideration is how to declare defeat against the terrorists without accepting the blame for declaring unilateral defeat in the one war we can’t afford to lose.
While we’re at it, let’s just be blunt about this. Let’s not let Hagel, Biden, Baker, Kerry and others appropriate the realist label when that isn’t who they are. Who they are is a collection of failures and/or idiots. To the best of my knowledge, only Baker’s been on the right side of any foreign policy. Even then, he counseled against taking out Saddam, which only left us having to defeat him later on. The rest of them are foreign policy idiots.
The commission’s co-chairmen have urged members and staff not to discuss their deliberations. As a result, those who were willing to talk about the commission’s work and the draft reports did so on the condition of anonymity.
TRANSLATION: Though the commission’s co-chairmen have urged members and staff not to discuss their deliberations, some members and staff have acted dishonorably by ignoring their directives.
Technorati Tags: Baker Commission, Lee Hamilton, Leakers, National Security, Iran, Iraq, Syria
Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog
November 28th, 2006 at 1:56 am
[...] Cross-posted at California Conservative Categories: Homeland Security, National Security, Iraq, Iran, Terrorism, Patriotism, Tyrants | [...]
November 28th, 2006 at 9:10 am
Iran To Do All It Can To Help…
Reuters reports, Iran says will do all it can to help Iraq: President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said Iran would do whatever it could to help provide security to Iraq amid warnings the country was on the brink of civil war. Aww…….
November 28th, 2006 at 12:53 pm
[...] Several commission members, including some Democrats, are discussing proposals that call for a declaration that within a specified period of time, perhaps as short as a year, a significant number of American troops should be withdrawn, …Read more: here [...]
November 28th, 2006 at 12:55 pm
[...] Aside from the policy aspects of the Baker-Hamilton CommissionÂ’s report, which are awful enough, it should be seen as utterly immoral to abandon a nation after telling them that youÂ’d help them become a democracy. …Read more: here [...]
November 28th, 2006 at 1:06 pm
[...] This year, like in all other years, Democrats will fawn all over the report while pushing for acceptance of all its recommendations. The White House should reject these recommendations because theyÂ’re defeatism disguised as ‘realismÂ’. …Read more: here [...]
November 28th, 2006 at 4:55 pm
Too bad they didn’t go after al-Qaeda first before toppling two governments simultaneously thereby creating the chaos required for the simmering sectarian hatreds to flourish. Anyway, that would have been what is known as ‘clever’, something that this administration isn’t known for. Any predicitons by Gary I take with a huge block of salt, given his stellar predictions about the election despite defeat staring him in the face. I’ll give you this, you didn’t flinch.
November 29th, 2006 at 1:07 am
we should get Clinton to arbitrate, he great at this. he’ll promise to provide Syria and Iran with nuclear weapons technology like he did China, in return for their acceptance of government control of Baghdad. Its a win-win situation all around, and the America nuclear weapons companies that care less about nationalism will be all to happy to comply. They sure helped out clintonians economy in the ’90s.
November 29th, 2006 at 4:42 pm
This blog post has been nominated for inclusion in The Blog Watch article published Sundays in The Sacramento Bee’s Forum section. As part of a demonstration program, readers are invited to help rate the candidate blog posts. The highest-rated posts will get top consideration for the limited space available Sunday. To participate, visit ipsosacto.com/bw Voting ends Thursday afternoon.