<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;We may be safer, but where&#8217;s the tall guy from Afghanistan?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/we-may-be-safer-but-wheres-the-tall-guy-from-afghanistan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/we-may-be-safer-but-wheres-the-tall-guy-from-afghanistan/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 01:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/we-may-be-safer-but-wheres-the-tall-guy-from-afghanistan/comment-page-1/#comment-95908</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 16:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2226#comment-95908</guid>
		<description>Perhaps if Senator Clinton's "loved one" had been more concerned about his duties as president than he was about the location of a cigar or the use of a certain part of his body, he could have had the time and interest to have captured or killed the man already responsible for several attacks on Americans.

Who is more to blame?  bin Laden was doing what he perceived as his job.  Was Clinton?  And if Senator Clinton was as wrapped up in the day-to-days of the White House as she would have us believe, how much of the blame can also be laid at her feet, or blood on her hands?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps if Senator Clinton&#8217;s &#8220;loved one&#8221; had been more concerned about his duties as president than he was about the location of a cigar or the use of a certain part of his body, he could have had the time and interest to have captured or killed the man already responsible for several attacks on Americans.</p>
<p>Who is more to blame?  bin Laden was doing what he perceived as his job.  Was Clinton?  And if Senator Clinton was as wrapped up in the day-to-days of the White House as she would have us believe, how much of the blame can also be laid at her feet, or blood on her hands?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

