A few years before the Clinton adminstration along with the FBI debated the strong arm of the law, in tracking the Holyland foundation based in Texas.

Why didn’t they then stop this organization even though they knew they funded terrorist “Hamas”?

1995 even then ACLU along with Republicans watered down as CNN calls it the wiretapping part of Clinton’s anti-terrorism law, of course we all know that the Democrats were all for that then.

Even the New York Times.

That was then, this is now 9/11 has changed everything.

“For you moonbat idiots, that means that if this information isn’t made available to the IRS & other government agencies, it’s a violation of the law.

[No, it isn't, fruitbat. For roughly ten thousand dollars I can create a Dubai Offhore Company... "There is no public register of shareholders and directors... Dubai has very strong client confidentiality laws and has refused to exchange information with the OECD." Stop trying to sound like you're so smart. You are just another presumptuous, paranoid fruitbat. You write like you got your degree from Turnip Truck University. you don't know what you're talking about.]

“These are financial records that the IRS, the SEC & other Treasury Dept. agencies review on a daily basis.”

[You think so? You don't get out much, do you?]

Oh, I get it now. They get uptight because it’s legal, within established law, and makes sense. Those are three foreign concepts to the ‘bats.

How can our Republicans allow our freedoms to be so seriously compromised with broad wiretaps, email monitoring, and now banking and wire snooping without warrants?

How can you be so ignorant of the laws on the books? The law requires that these records be reported to the IRS. For you moonbat idiots, that means that if this information isn’t made available to the IRS & other government agencies, it’s a violation of the law. It has nothing to do with big government/limited government. These are financial records that the IRS, the SEC & other Treasury Dept. agencies review on a daily basis.

Furthermore, the NY Times says in the article that no laws were being broken.

In closing, it’d be insane to believe that the IRS & other agencies that regulate financial transactions wouldn’t be allowed to review major financial transactions. This has nothing to do with privacy of a person’s financial records. NONE!!! The Supreme Court has ruled that this isn’t subject to Fourth Amendment protections or any other constitutional protections. That ruling isn’t a recent Roberts Court ruling, either. It’s at least 20 years ago.

Get a life & get a clue.

I notice the WSJ is getting a pass from all the bloggers railing at the NYT and LA Times.
The Wall Street Journal published the same information. Why do they get off scott free?

Comment by gregdn

You mean like this:

The NY Times, LA Times and the WSJ should all be made to pay, either financially through a massive cancellation of people’s subscriptions or through criminal prosecution.

WSJ is how conservative bloggers refer to the Wall Street Journal. Perhaps you should reread how conservative bloggers have been chastising them.

Bush pleaded with the NYT to not break the story for the sake of national security. They did. And that’s what this is all about.

Maybe watch the video again. And Tex, if you’re still around, make us all some popcorn — but hold the nutter butter. (Couldn’t resist…)

You tell ‘em, Gary. That comment reads like something the guy spams on every conservative blog — and then uses the Texas moniker to prop up a little credibility.

The “dark un-prosperous days of reaganomics”… not according to GDP or NYSE. Back then he must’ve called himself Rock Examiner — and living under one.

If being conservative means fleecing this nation, getting our people killed for the control of oil, murdering innocent people, shifting the direction of our economy back to the dark un-prosperous days of reaganomics and destroying the middle and lower classes of this country to benefit the rich & elite, then a lot of people need to re-evaluate what they think they are when they say that they are conservative.

That sounds like today’s nutter talking points. Anyone who thinks that Reaganomics “destroyed the middle and lower classes” isn’t a conservative. In fact, anyone who thinks that is, in fact, a moonbat nutter.

You’re a liberal liar and you’ve exposed yourself as a liberal liar with your insane, idiotic & inflammatory anti-conservative yammering.

I’m betting that you’re thinking that I’m going to tell you to shut up and never show your face around here again. Quite the opposite. I want you with a loud bullhorn speaking out on your beliefs on a daily basis so that people can see what liberalism looks like and be repulsed.

(Scroll down for updates) The New York Times has once again escalated its Journalistic Jihad against the American people, proving beyond all doubt that the Times’ personal interests violently clash with America’s public interest. On Friday, the NY Ti…

Bush said over and over that he was going to restore dignity to the Whitehouse. If by that he meant destroy this nation and its constitution then I guess he has successfully restored dignity to the Whitehouse. It’s pretty bad when truth is crying out to be heard and it is continually reduced to being liberal lies by those who claim to be conservative or even Christian. Those of you who support bush should all be ashamed. There is no real dignity among any of you. The following is not a pro Clinton or pro Democrat statement but simply a statement of fact and those who ignore this are hypocrites. These so called conservatives and republicans raked Clinton over the coals for his indiscretion with an intern. However, the very same people condone the murder of our citizens and Iraqi civilians, blatant lies from bush and his cabinet and a presidency that is extremely fiscally unsound with the underlying goal of raiding the nation’s treasury to benefit the rich and wealthy. The facts are all on the surface and bush supporters seem to enjoy having that knife further twisted in their backs by bush and his administration. Clinton screws and intern and the religious right wing of this nation think our country is going to hell in a hand basket. Bush screws over an entire nation and the republican party and religious right wing have no problems justifying and condoning their hypocritical actions and behavior. Man…Nixon got impeached for offences far less then that.