Port Security Worries
Washington Times National Security reporter Bill Gertz is reporting that some anonymous Bush administration officials objected to the deal that would transfer management of 6 U.S. ports from British to UAE control, citing the possibility of terrorists using the ports to bring in WMD’s.
The reality is that our ports haven’t been run by U.S. companies for quite some time.
The current firestorm in Congress is much ado about PR and politics. Transfering management to a Dubai-based and government-owned company just sounds wrong. At the same time, Democrats are using this issue to criticize the administration. The difference this time is that it appears that they’ll finally gain traction on a national security issue.
It seems to me that Congress and President Bush need to get more serious about port security. That’s why it was puzzling to me that President Bush didn’t start talking key senators like Pat Roberts and Chuck Grassley through this alot earlier. If he had, maybe they would’ve raised some concerns on this and those concerns would have gotten addressed. As it stands right now, that didn’t happen and the concerns are being aired publicly.
I can understand the President’s insistence that the deal go through, knowing that keeping the UAE as an active ally in that part of the world is vitally important. They’ve been one of our better allies in the post-9/11 world. I can understand Congress’ obstinance on this, too, knowing that they would’ve gotten pummeled on this issue this fall.
In the end, I suspect that Congress will sit down with President Bush and work something out that allows Congress to show that they’re serious about security and that allows the President to keep the UAE on board.
Cross-post at LetFreedomRing
February 22nd, 2006 at 10:14 am
Well, let’s hope none of them have spouses that work in sensitive areas of government, like the CIA.
Yeah, and in this case, Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation Co, the British company that Dubai World Ports is buying and therefor acquiring control of our ports, was a private company based in a country — the UK — that has been our ally for something like 200+ years. Contrast this with DWP, owned by the Emir of the UAE. This is the same Emir that: officially recognizes the Taliban as the legitimate government of Afganistan; has called for the total destruction of removal of Isreal; governs the land and business operations of a country that supported financially and logistically two of the 19 Sept. 11 hijackers; and last but in no way least:was an important transfer point for shipments of smuggled nuclear components sent to Iran, North Korea and Libya by a Pakistani scientist. (Smuggled contraband through its own ports… wait a minute, isn’t that what this whole brouhaha is all about?)
So saying that our ports haven’t been run by US companies is a specious claim. A private company in the UK is not the same as a government-owned company in the UAE.
No, this is about Homeland Security. Namely, what the Bush Administration is about to do is hand over the day-to-day operations of six major ports on the Eastern seaboard to terrorists and terrorist sympathizers. Bush and his spokesmen can do their stand-ups in front of the White House all they want, but the truth remains that the management of the ports will be controlled by a government that says one thing (”We’re on your side!”) and does another(”Welcome to Dubai, Osama!”) What happened to the Bush doctorine of not differentiating between terrorists and nations that harbor terrorists?
As to your injection of partisan politics, the criticism has come from both sides of the aisle, of whom you should note, Sen. Frist, Rep. King (R-NY), and Speaker Hastert. At least try and be fair, here.
Which leads us to the real Bush Doctorine: money talks and bulls**t walks. This is not an international political incident; it’s a business deal that no one in the Bush Administration thought anyone would notice.
I know how we liberals can prevent this… get the U.N. to endorse the deal, and the conservatives will demand that it stop!
February 23rd, 2006 at 8:05 am
[...] Campaign » Helping Osama Keep His Promise » Politically Correct Coup » Port Security Worries, Part II » Court Documents: Hospital Gave Lethal Injections to Patients During Hurricane Katrina» Samarrah Mosque Bombing » GOP Powerhouse in the Making » Muslim Activists and Campus Liberals Agree: Free Speech Has Limits » Iran Promises Financial Assistance to PA » Port Security: We Weren’t Wrong To Question, But We’re Satisfied By The Answers » “Pussies” At The Gate » That’s Just Brilliant: Google’s Philanthropy » Thinking of becoming a liberal? » Praising Alan Dershowitz » Hell Hath No Fury: Women, Hatred, and the Middle East » Nabbing Terrorists and Opening the Ports » Port Security Worries » Malik Zulu Shabazz » S.F. Examines Power of Dog Droppings List all posts » [...]