U.S. District Judge Anna Diggs Taylor became the first judge to strike down the National Security Agency’s program, which she says violates the rights to free speech and privacy.

A Jimmy Carter appointee has endangered us by ruling that the NSA Terrorist Surveillance Program is unconstitutional. Hopefully, the Bush administration will appeal this immediately to get this ruling struck down.

This judge has a history of interfering in established legal processes. Now she’s said that we don’t have the right to protect ourselve from people who’ve said that they want to kill us. Here’s a display of her ethical challenges:

Chief Judge Anna Diggs Taylor of the federal District Court in Detroit tried to take the suit against the law school away from Judge Bernard Freedman, who had been assigned it through a blind draw, and who was suspected of being skeptical about affirmative action, and consolidate it with a similar suit against the university’s undergraduate admissions practice, which Judge Patrick Duggan was hearing. The chief judge dropped that effort was dropped after the judge hearing the law school complaint went public with a blistering opinion objecting to what he termed “the highly irregular” effort of the chief judge. Judge Duggan ruled in favor of the undergraduate racial preferences, while Judge Freedman ruled against the law school preferences.

It’s obvious why the ACLU filed its lawsuit in this court. They must’ve known that she’s a pacifist judge who doesn’t take the GWOT seriously. They must’ve known that she’s ultraliberal dipshit who thinks that hates President Bush. They must’ve known that she’s to the left of Bernie Sanders. They must’ve known that she’s a meddler predisposed to an ultraliberal ideology.

If that weren’t so, they wouldn’t have filed the suit there. Rest assured that this ruling won’t stand. It will get overturned.

Technorati: NSA, ACLU, Counterterrorism, 9/11, Jimmy Carter

Cross-post at LetFreedomRingBlog

1. [...] Cross-posted at California Conservative Categories: ACLU, Homeland Security, National Security, Moonbats, Intel, Terrorism, 9/11 | [...]

   Pingback by Let Freedom Ring » Blog Archive » Judge Strikes Down NSA Program — August 17, 2006 @ 2:39 pm

2. [...] California Conservative [...]

   Pingback by Flopping Aces » Blog Archive » Carter Lackey Overturns Program That Protects This Country — August 17, 2006 @ 3:24 pm

3. Judge nixes warrantless surveillance

   …

   A federal judge ruled Thursday that the government’s warrantless wiretapping program is unconstituti…

   Trackback by Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator — August 17, 2006 @ 4:37 pm

4. ACLU vs NSA Leftist Judge Rules Unconstitutional…

   I am way too angry to post on this story even when it broke yesterday, this is being appealed and anyone with a half brain would agree that this is a vital tool in tracking terrorists. A MUST, please put more ears on the phones A.S.A.P. I agree w ……..

   Trackback by Assorted Babble by Suzie — August 18, 2006 @ 12:41 am

5. Toghe rosse a Detroit…

   Se non vi fidate troppo di come stanno raccontando in Italia la sentenza di un giudice federale di Detroit, che ha dichiarato incostituzionale il “Terrorist Surveillance Program” voluto dall’amministrazione Bush dopo l’11 settembre, vi consiglio di…

   Trackback by The Right Nation — August 18, 2006 @ 5:04 am

1. Other than the outcome, what makes you disagree with the logic of the opinion?

   Comment by Chris Bell — August 17, 2006 @ 3:14 pm