<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GOP Putting Heat on NYTimes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 05:30:53 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-206958</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Jul 2006 00:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3415#comment-206958</guid>
		<description>Sure, maybe he didn't say exactly how he was going to do it, but he did say they were going to be scrutinzing international financial transactions. You'd have to be one idiot of a terrorist to use 'normal' financial channels after that. Besides, as anyone who's read about the Islamic world knows, they have their own ways of moving cash around that circumvent Western financial institutions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, maybe he didn&#8217;t say exactly how he was going to do it, but he did say they were going to be scrutinzing international financial transactions. You&#8217;d have to be one idiot of a terrorist to use &#8216;normal&#8217; financial channels after that. Besides, as anyone who&#8217;s read about the Islamic world knows, they have their own ways of moving cash around that circumvent Western financial institutions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rahjr2k</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-206641</link>
		<dc:creator>rahjr2k</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Jul 2006 10:43:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3415#comment-206641</guid>
		<description>yeah, but Bush DIDN'T tell the world exactly how they would be doing that, disclosing which financial institutions would be participating and he certainly didn't talk about the over seas and foriegn involvment in the program, which is where most of the good info came from.  Since the NYT article, several of the foriegn financial institutions have pulled out, cutting off a significant source of usable intel... seems these companies didn't like having their business dealing splashed all over the front page for the world to see.

Even in the article, the times admitted there was nothing illegal about it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, but Bush DIDN&#8217;T tell the world exactly how they would be doing that, disclosing which financial institutions would be participating and he certainly didn&#8217;t talk about the over seas and foriegn involvment in the program, which is where most of the good info came from.  Since the NYT article, several of the foriegn financial institutions have pulled out, cutting off a significant source of usable intel&#8230; seems these companies didn&#8217;t like having their business dealing splashed all over the front page for the world to see.</p>
<p>Even in the article, the times admitted there was nothing illegal about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Morning Coffee</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-206384</link>
		<dc:creator>Morning Coffee</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jun 2006 05:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3415#comment-206384</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;House passes resolution condemning Jihad Journalism&lt;/strong&gt;

183 members of the House of representatives Voted against it&#8230;
Maybe they need a resolution against Jihad Representation&#8230;.
...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>House passes resolution condemning Jihad Journalism</strong></p>
<p>183 members of the House of representatives Voted against it&#8230;<br />
Maybe they need a resolution against Jihad Representation&#8230;.<br />
&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-206300</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 18:13:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3415#comment-206300</guid>
		<description>Um, not to burst anyone's bubble but, as I recall, after 9/11, Bush publically announced that they were going to be scrutinizing international financial transactions in support of the GWOT. I don't understand what the big hub-bub is about. If the NYT is guilty of anything, it's trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. Of course, the same can be said for people calling the the NYT a bunch of traitors, but there  you go.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, not to burst anyone&#8217;s bubble but, as I recall, after 9/11, Bush publically announced that they were going to be scrutinizing international financial transactions in support of the GWOT. I don&#8217;t understand what the big hub-bub is about. If the NYT is guilty of anything, it&#8217;s trying to make a mountain out of a mole hill. Of course, the same can be said for people calling the the NYT a bunch of traitors, but there  you go.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/terrorism/gop-putting-heat-on-nytimes/comment-page-1/#comment-206286</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Jun 2006 16:23:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3415#comment-206286</guid>
		<description>Me:  What time is it?
Ignorant response:  Sure looks like rain today.

Repubs:  The NYT "SWIFT" article was, if not treasonous, certainly a blow to a useful tool in our fight against terror-funding.
Donkey response:  Sure looks like rain today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Me:  What time is it?<br />
Ignorant response:  Sure looks like rain today.</p>
<p>Repubs:  The NYT &#8220;SWIFT&#8221; article was, if not treasonous, certainly a blow to a useful tool in our fight against terror-funding.<br />
Donkey response:  Sure looks like rain today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

