Comments on: To Wikipedia or Not to Wikipedia, That is the Question http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/to-wikipedia-or-not-to-wikipedia-that-is-the-question/ Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM) Sun, 27 May 2012 04:12:33 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Amy Proctor http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/to-wikipedia-or-not-to-wikipedia-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-85121 Amy Proctor Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:50:18 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1978#comment-85121 Perhaps it is! Peace! Perhaps it is!

Peace!

]]> By: Matthew http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/to-wikipedia-or-not-to-wikipedia-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-85113 Matthew Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:46:17 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1978#comment-85113 Amy, I merely thought the comment amusing and ironic when juxtaposed against the nature of the piece. Amy, I merely thought the comment amusing and ironic when juxtaposed against the nature of the piece.

]]> By: Amy Proctor http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/to-wikipedia-or-not-to-wikipedia-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-85110 Amy Proctor Sat, 14 Jan 2006 02:39:09 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1978#comment-85110 Matthew, I have only Wikipedia disclaimers and user testimony to back me up. At any rate, I'm open to the idea that Wikipedia would be unbiased and fair.... the whole entry is pondering and conjecture! Much like the Wikipedia site itself, eh? Matthew, I have only Wikipedia disclaimers and user testimony to back me up. At any rate, I’m open to the idea that Wikipedia would be unbiased and fair…. the whole entry is pondering and conjecture!

Much like the Wikipedia site itself, eh?

]]> By: Matthew http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/to-wikipedia-or-not-to-wikipedia-that-is-the-question/comment-page-1/#comment-84993 Matthew Sat, 14 Jan 2006 00:21:17 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1978#comment-84993 "It is often non-Conservatives who quote from Winipedia as if it were an authoritative source. " I suppose you have statistics to back this up, right? Oh, wait, that's just your unsupported conjecture in print. You could post to Wikipedia! “It is often non-Conservatives who quote from Winipedia as if it were an authoritative source. ”

I suppose you have statistics to back this up, right? Oh, wait, that’s just your unsupported conjecture in print. You could post to Wikipedia!

]]>