<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: GoogleTube for $1.65 Million</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/googletube-for-165-million/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/googletube-for-165-million/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:50:57 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: modern warfare 2 tv</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/googletube-for-165-million/comment-page-1/#comment-2616489</link>
		<dc:creator>modern warfare 2 tv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jun 2010 05:01:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/miscellania/googletube-for-165-million/#comment-2616489</guid>
		<description>Throughout this applying (my spouse and i flat-out will most likely not attain), necessary which often prevents people by remarks this written content on their own. Simply carry out perception I have every thing increase, If i will probably. The actual “great distribute!” not which chemical like is really tedious and also an entire time.With other, within content are going to be incredibly one-sided for whatever reason, was not as so that you can thoughts and opinions for that backup provides they certainly not appreciably within various other concepts. Get a good reveal widespread.When i like article however, motive I'm writing comments.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Throughout this applying (my spouse and i flat-out will most likely not attain), necessary which often prevents people by remarks this written content on their own. Simply carry out perception I have every thing increase, If i will probably. The actual “great distribute!” not which chemical like is really tedious and also an entire time.With other, within content are going to be incredibly one-sided for whatever reason, was not as so that you can thoughts and opinions for that backup provides they certainly not appreciably within various other concepts. Get a good reveal widespread.When i like article however, motive I&#8217;m writing comments.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: noyb</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/googletube-for-165-million/comment-page-1/#comment-270231</link>
		<dc:creator>noyb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 19:24:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/miscellania/googletube-for-165-million/#comment-270231</guid>
		<description>Yeah... this is soooo much different than Rupert Murdoch buying MySpace.  Democrats showing videos and Republicans hunting for underage tail - yeah that sounds about right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah&#8230; this is soooo much different than Rupert Murdoch buying MySpace.  Democrats showing videos and Republicans hunting for underage tail - yeah that sounds about right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clicked</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/googletube-for-165-million/comment-page-1/#comment-270056</link>
		<dc:creator>Clicked</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 08:39:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/miscellania/googletube-for-165-million/#comment-270056</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;NORK nukes, GoogTube, Blogger blues and other news...&lt;/strong&gt;

Between the North Korea nuke test, Google's purchase of YouTube, and lingering developments in the Foley......</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>NORK nukes, GoogTube, Blogger blues and other news&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Between the North Korea nuke test, Google&#8217;s purchase of YouTube, and lingering developments in the Foley&#8230;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aakash</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/technology/googletube-for-165-million/comment-page-1/#comment-269941</link>
		<dc:creator>Aakash</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 21:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/miscellania/googletube-for-165-million/#comment-269941</guid>
		<description>When Google purchased Blogger, that &lt;a href="http://uis.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_uis_archive.html#105726013501742412" rel="nofollow"&gt;quickly improved&lt;/a&gt; the service provided by it, for those of us who had been having problems with bugs in its system.

Despite the criticism it gets, myself - and others - are still on Blogger.  I haven't found a good reason, as of yet, to swtich.

As for YouTube, it is relatively new, and I have mixed feelings about it... It's useful, but it kinda doesn't seem right that so much - including music, which is supposed to be copyrighted - is so readily available, for free.

I wonder if Google's buyout could create less content to be available, or more.  And will YouTube and Google Videos be merged?

With so much new stuff becoming available, so frequently, it can make things more convenient... but also, more confusing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When Google purchased Blogger, that <a href="http://uis.blogspot.com/2003_07_01_uis_archive.html#105726013501742412" rel="nofollow">quickly improved</a> the service provided by it, for those of us who had been having problems with bugs in its system.</p>
<p>Despite the criticism it gets, myself - and others - are still on Blogger.  I haven&#8217;t found a good reason, as of yet, to swtich.</p>
<p>As for YouTube, it is relatively new, and I have mixed feelings about it&#8230; It&#8217;s useful, but it kinda doesn&#8217;t seem right that so much - including music, which is supposed to be copyrighted - is so readily available, for free.</p>
<p>I wonder if Google&#8217;s buyout could create less content to be available, or more.  And will YouTube and Google Videos be merged?</p>
<p>With so much new stuff becoming available, so frequently, it can make things more convenient&#8230; but also, more confusing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

