<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Let&#8217;s Use The Majority This Time</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/special-interests/lets-use-the-majority-this-time/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/special-interests/lets-use-the-majority-this-time/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 27 May 2012 03:49:46 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: USN Ret.</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/special-interests/lets-use-the-majority-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2499533</link>
		<dc:creator>USN Ret.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 02:26:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=7942#comment-2499533</guid>
		<description>Hear Hear!   Again where is gods name is the Republican party.  What do they think, 2010 is a slam dunk?  That all they have to do is let Fox news carry their water?

Why aren't they pounding the dems everyday, calling them on their bullshit lies and deception hard fast and often? Why?

Because they are them, and we are us.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hear Hear!   Again where is gods name is the Republican party.  What do they think, 2010 is a slam dunk?  That all they have to do is let Fox news carry their water?</p>
<p>Why aren&#8217;t they pounding the dems everyday, calling them on their bullshit lies and deception hard fast and often? Why?</p>
<p>Because they are them, and we are us.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/special-interests/lets-use-the-majority-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2499293</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Dec 2009 22:57:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=7942#comment-2499293</guid>
		<description>I can't say that Duh-1 has broken his promise to get rid of "business as usual" in D.C. - he has taken it to a completely new, unseen-in-history height of nefarious and secret attacks against the political and economic systems that made this country great in the first place.

Which is probably why he has done it.  He couldn't stand the thought that maybe, just maybe, this country, with all its warts and problems, is still better than anything conceived before, and certainly better than he will leave it.

And BTW, when will someone start challenging the liar donks on their "affordable health care" meme?  Costing more is "affordable?"  If that's the case, I should have been charging a lot more for the products my company had, just to make them "affordable".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t say that Duh-1 has broken his promise to get rid of &#8220;business as usual&#8221; in D.C. - he has taken it to a completely new, unseen-in-history height of nefarious and secret attacks against the political and economic systems that made this country great in the first place.</p>
<p>Which is probably why he has done it.  He couldn&#8217;t stand the thought that maybe, just maybe, this country, with all its warts and problems, is still better than anything conceived before, and certainly better than he will leave it.</p>
<p>And BTW, when will someone start challenging the liar donks on their &#8220;affordable health care&#8221; meme?  Costing more is &#8220;affordable?&#8221;  If that&#8217;s the case, I should have been charging a lot more for the products my company had, just to make them &#8220;affordable&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sonny</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/special-interests/lets-use-the-majority-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2498521</link>
		<dc:creator>sonny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:07:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=7942#comment-2498521</guid>
		<description>How about this for a campaign promise?

"If elected, I swear to God above that I WILL NOT govern like a democrat...(like republicans have done for the last ten years)".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How about this for a campaign promise?</p>
<p>&#8220;If elected, I swear to God above that I WILL NOT govern like a democrat&#8230;(like republicans have done for the last ten years)&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: POWinCA</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/special-interests/lets-use-the-majority-this-time/comment-page-1/#comment-2498250</link>
		<dc:creator>POWinCA</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Dec 2009 05:50:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=7942#comment-2498250</guid>
		<description>This monstrosity of a bill is like the spawn of some demonic Greek god and an animal - inhuman, evil, and insidious - deserving of a hero to slay.

When a private citizen gives favors to a Senator in exchange for his vote, it's called "bribery." When a President or a Senate Majority Leader does it, it's called "artful politics", "compromise" or "logrolling."

Political Economics has shown us many years ago that logrolling can lead to a slate of proposals being passed, each portion of which would fail under majority vote. The deals offered to Landrieu, Nelson, and Sanders is not only nefarious, it's likely a violation of Equal Protection. But when Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution is considered merely a trifle, what other part of the Constitution bears any relevance?

Obama has broken every promise he made with this bill to liberals, conservatives, and the nation: no public option, funding for abortion, not deficit neutral, Medicare cuts, mandates and fines, higher insurance premiums, no universal coverage, etc. etc. ad nauseum. Please assure me so that I may sleep well on Christmas Eve that the electorate will remember all these broken promises next November? If you're not sure, lie to me please.

Frankly, if Obama had passed a single-payer system it would be less devastating than this scrapbook of political backroom deals and dusty old proposals. We will bear all of the costs of higher premiums, rationed care, insolvent Medicare, disappearance of private insurance, lack of transparency, lack of privacy, higher taxes, higher deficits and get NONE of the benefits of universal health care. It's the worst of all possible outcomes. It could not destroy our health care system better if it were intended to do so.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This monstrosity of a bill is like the spawn of some demonic Greek god and an animal - inhuman, evil, and insidious - deserving of a hero to slay.</p>
<p>When a private citizen gives favors to a Senator in exchange for his vote, it&#8217;s called &#8220;bribery.&#8221; When a President or a Senate Majority Leader does it, it&#8217;s called &#8220;artful politics&#8221;, &#8220;compromise&#8221; or &#8220;logrolling.&#8221;</p>
<p>Political Economics has shown us many years ago that logrolling can lead to a slate of proposals being passed, each portion of which would fail under majority vote. The deals offered to Landrieu, Nelson, and Sanders is not only nefarious, it&#8217;s likely a violation of Equal Protection. But when Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution is considered merely a trifle, what other part of the Constitution bears any relevance?</p>
<p>Obama has broken every promise he made with this bill to liberals, conservatives, and the nation: no public option, funding for abortion, not deficit neutral, Medicare cuts, mandates and fines, higher insurance premiums, no universal coverage, etc. etc. ad nauseum. Please assure me so that I may sleep well on Christmas Eve that the electorate will remember all these broken promises next November? If you&#8217;re not sure, lie to me please.</p>
<p>Frankly, if Obama had passed a single-payer system it would be less devastating than this scrapbook of political backroom deals and dusty old proposals. We will bear all of the costs of higher premiums, rationed care, insolvent Medicare, disappearance of private insurance, lack of transparency, lack of privacy, higher taxes, higher deficits and get NONE of the benefits of universal health care. It&#8217;s the worst of all possible outcomes. It could not destroy our health care system better if it were intended to do so.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

