Jackson: Not Guilty of Child Molestation?
Live blogging…
Not guilty on all counts.
Un-be-lievable.
Saddam Hussein needs this jury.
Fans outside the court room let the doves fly…
Conclusion: Free to live a life as a child molester. No double jeapordy. He never has to worry about being accused of being a pervert, ever again. FOXNews guest calls names him: “The Teflon molester”
Photos here.
Michelle Malkin quips: “Maybe L.A. won’t burn today after all. But you never know with these people…”
Justice may be blind, but it ain’t cheap. First O.J., now M.J. The “justice” system works for those who can afford it.
If Jackson were an “average Joe,” regardless of race, he would’ve been behind bars years ago. Instead, he bought freedom.
UPDATE: Interviewing the jury: Who cares?
Not the brightest group…
Juror: “We came in with our personal beliefs, but we spent a lot of time studying the evidence.”
If this case didn’t present enough evidence to convict, than there’s no hope for future victims of child molestation. That’s the message.
Question: What stands out as the most important thing?
Juror: “Can’t really point to one specific item right now. Can’t pick one out. Tons. I would just say we considered all the evidence.”
Question: Any testimony stood out?
Juror: “Can’t point to anything specific right now”
Question: What role did the fact that Michael Jackson is an international superstar?
Juror: “We treated him like we was just anybody else.”
Obviously, just like anybody else who sleeps with young boys.
Continuing the circus…
Telemundo newscaster asks for any juror who speaks spanish to give a “shout out” to all the latino listeners.
Juror: “I didn’t like the (accuser’s) mother snapping her fingers. I thought ‘Don’t snap your fingers at me, lady’” (Laughter follows)
Deep analysis.
The Political Teen says it: “Jackson Gets Away With…Molestation”
UPDATE: (6/14) Jackson Jury Finds Reasonable Doubt Or so they say.
RELATED:
Jackson Promises Not To Sleep With Young Boys,
Anymore. Really. This Time For Sure.
June 13th, 2005 at 1:33 pm
Wacko Jacko
All things being equal, if Michael Jackson were an ordained priest with a white collar around his neck, would he have received the same verdict?
June 13th, 2005 at 1:38 pm
A priest would have been found guilty, no doubt. Especially Catholic. Today, the church is guilty until proven otherwise.
June 13th, 2005 at 2:32 pm
California can’t convict anybody
What’s with California prosecutors? They can’t seem to get a conviction no matter what the defendant did nor how high is the mountain of evidence against him/her/it. If, in fact, the defendants in these high profile cases are innocent, why on earth w…
June 13th, 2005 at 3:16 pm
A Smooth Criminal??
NOT GUILTY
I may be the only person who isn’t a crazed Michael Jackson fanatic that is glad he was not convicted.
Drudge says “Arrest This Man” under a picture of Sneddon…..
June 14th, 2005 at 4:40 am
Not guilty? Are you kidding me?
10 counts. 10 acquittals. Are you frigging kidding me? The guy has kiddie-porn(along with regular porn) all over his house, booze in his house where kids could easily access it (whether he gave it to them or not is immaterial), and invites gaggles of 9…
June 14th, 2005 at 4:06 pm
[...] ; Steve Jobs: Apple’s CEO Talks About Falling From The Tree In Order to Grow » Jackson: Not Guilty of Child Molestation? [...]
June 15th, 2005 at 12:24 pm
[...] ; Steve Jobs: Apple’s CEO Talks About Falling From The Tree In Order to Grow » Jackson: Not Guilty of Child Molestation? [...]
July 18th, 2005 at 9:17 am
[...] moved to another country.” Rumor has it that he’s considering Los Angelest. Posted @ 8:17 am | Permalink | No Responses » TrackBack URI for [...]