Search This Site

Please Visit Our Sponsors:

Recent Posts

» Health Care Question For Puff Daschle, Ted Kennedy
» This Says It All
» Republican Saxby Chambliss Elected to Georgia Senate
» The Senate “Remains An Option”?
» Is Franken Influencing Harry Reid?
» Canvassing Board Liveblogging
» Franken’s Attention Turning to Absentee Ballots
» The Latest From the Recount
» Coleman-Franken Isn’t Florida 2000
» What Did, Didn’t Go Wrong This Election
» The Recount PR Game
» More Franken Shenanigans
» Daschle’s Dream? Or Daschle’s Disaster?
» Team Franken’s Despicable Tactics
» Franken: Election Workers Broke Election Law
» State Canvassing Board Rejects Franken’s 11th Hour Bid
» Now That the Election’s Over…
» Lies And the Lying SOB’s That Peddle This BS
» Refreshing Talk From Miami
» It ISN’T The Funding, Stupid

List all posts »

Promote

Add to your Favorites

Set Font Size

Default font size    Large font size    Massive font size

Translations

Support C.C.

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Blogstuff

SpamPoison

eXTReMe Tracker
TTLB code goes here

Get your Google PageRank

Blogroll


link = recently updated

Blogroll This Site

Conservatisms

"This country has come to feel the same when Congress is in session as when the baby gets hold of a hammer."
-- Will Rogers

Capitalism



Read Us via Email!

Enter your email address:

Powered by FeedBurner

Syndication

Just click on the button to be taken to a page where you can sign up with almost every feedreader imaginable!



This site is best viewed with:

Spread The Word

Nancy Pelosi - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Dianne Feinstein - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Barbara Boxer - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Please, download this button to your site.
Please, download this button to your site.


Stuff

GET SOME GEAR at the Califonia Conservative Store!
EXPAND YOUR MIND at the California Conservative Bookstore!



News & Opinions

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  Calif. city council gives up retiree benefits
Posted 43 minutes ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  Police think activist was stuck in elevator before plunge, friend says
Posted 43 minutes ago

CNSNews.com Headlines:  Canada May Oust Conservative Government Just Two Months After Election
Posted 54 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Ira Mehlman: DREAM Over: Illegal Alien Student Amnesty Awakens to Fiscal Reality
Posted 56 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Amanda Carpenter: The Big Three Master Fearmongering
Posted 107 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Rich Smith: This Just In: Upgrades and Downgrades
Posted 3 hours ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  Purpose Prize for 3 working to change society
Posted 4 hours ago

CNSNews.com Headlines:  Israeli Settlers Clash With Palestinians, Police in West Bank City
Posted 4 hours ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Joe Magyer: You Should Buy Stocks Just Like This One
Posted 4 hours ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  Firm denies workers' comp in racial killing
Posted 5 hours ago


Links of Interest

Article Link 1 by Random Author
Interview 1 by Random Author
National Review Online
The Drudge Report If you don’t know what this site is, get off the Internet.
VDARE.COM The Truth Behind U.S. Immigration


It’s About the Decisionmaking

While thousands of worshipers expressed their adoration for the Obamessiah, John McCain took aim at Sen. Obama’s decision to not support the Surge which has dramatically reduced the violence in Iraq:

Senator Obama and I also faced a decision, which amounted to a real-time test for a future commander-in-chief. America passed that test. I believe my judgment passed that test. And I believe Senator Obama’s failed.

We both knew the politically safe choice was to support some form of retreat. All the polls said the “surge” was unpopular. Many pundits, experts and policymakers opposed it and advocated withdrawing our troops and accepting the consequences. I chose to support the new counterinsurgency strategy backed by additional troops, which I had advocated since 2003, after my first trip to Iraq. Many observers said my position would end my hopes of becoming president. I said I would rather lose a campaign than see America lose a war. My choice was not smart politics. It didn’t test well in focus groups. It ignored all the polls. It also didn’t matter. The country I love had one final chance to succeed in Iraq. The new strategy was it. So I supported it. Today, the effects of the new strategy are obvious. The surge has succeeded, and we are, at long last, finally winning this war.

Senator Obama made a different choice. He not only opposed the new strategy, but actually tried to prevent us from implementing it. He didn’t just advocate defeat, he tried to legislate it. When his efforts failed, he continued to predict the failure of our troops. As our soldiers and Marines prepared to move into Baghdad neighborhoods and Anbari villages, Senator Obama predicted that their efforts would make the sectarian violence in Iraq worse, not better.

And as our troops took the fight to the enemy, Senator Obama tried to cut off funding for them. He was one of only 14 senators to vote against the emergency funding in May 2007 that supported our troops in Iraq and Afghanistan. …

Three weeks after Senator Obama voted to deny funding for our troops in the field, General Ray Odierno launched the first major combat operations of the surge. Senator Obama declared defeat one month later: “My assessment is that the surge has not worked and we will not see a different report eight weeks from now.” His assessment was popular at the time. But it couldn’t have been more wrong.

By November 2007, the success of the surge was becoming apparent. Attacks on Coalition forces had dropped almost 60 percent from pre-surge levels. American casualties had fallen by more than half. Iraqi civilian deaths had fallen by more than two-thirds. But Senator Obama ignored the new and encouraging reality. “Not only have we not seen improvements,” he said, “but we’re actually worsening, potentially, a situation there.”

If Senator Obama had prevailed, American forces would have had to retreat under fire. The Iraqi Army would have collapsed. Civilian casualties would have increased dramatically. Al Qaeda would have killed the Sunni sheikhs who had begun to cooperate with us, and the “Sunni Awakening” would have been strangled at birth. Al Qaeda fighters would have safe havens, from where they could train Iraqis and foreigners, and turn Iraq into a base for launching attacks on Americans elsewhere. Civil war, genocide and wider conflict would have been likely.

Above all, America would have been humiliated and weakened. Our military, strained by years of sacrifice, would have suffered a demoralizing defeat. Our enemies around the globe would have been emboldened.

Senator Obama told the American people what he thought you wanted to hear. I told you the truth.

Fortunately, Senator Obama failed, not our military. We rejected the audacity of hopelessness, and we were right. Violence in Iraq fell to such low levels for such a long time that Senator Obama, detecting the success he never believed possible, falsely claimed that he had always predicted it. In Iraq, we are no longer on the doorstep of defeat, but on the road to victory.

Senator Obama said this week that even knowing what he knows today that he still would have opposed the surge. In retrospect, given the opportunity to choose between failure and success, he chooses failure. I cannot conceive of a Commander in Chief making that choice.

While Europe and the Agenda Media express their adoration of Sen. Obama, serious people are questioning Sen. Obama’s decisionmaking. It’s about time.

I’ve said for a long time that Sen. Obama isn’t qualified to be president. I stand by that. Why should we trust someone that makes decisions that MoveOn.org applaud? Why should we trust someone whose first consideration in decisionmaking is political ramifications.

Sen. McCain is right in saying that Sen. Obama played to his primary audience. He isn’t the first politician to do that. He won’t be the last. The problem with that is that presidents shouldn’t make life-and-death decisions based on anything other than the recommendations of experts.

What’s worse is that Sen. Obama sounded a defeatist after the surge started. St. Obama now speaks glowingly of the troops’ accomplishments. Prior to the nomination process, though, he spoke about how the surge had failed. There’s only one way he could reach that conclusion: He’d already reached a verdict. He didn’t take wait-and-see attitude. He’d decided that he couldn’t stay politically viable if he didn’t pander to MoveOn.org by predicting our military’s failure.

Likewise, Sen. Obama’s rigid opposition to increasing oil production, whether it’s from the OCS or ANWR or the Bakken Field, is predicated on his capitulation to the environutters. That’s hardly taking a principled stand. Appeasement, whether it’s with a rogue nation like Iran or whether it’s to the environutters, is a guaranteed failure.

We aren’t electing a prom king. We’re electing the leader of the free world. Based on his decisionmaking thus far, the Obamessiah isn’t the man for the job.

TechnoratiTechnorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , ,

Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>