Seems to me this is kinda like no one ever being able to attack that looney who lost her son because she has the moral high ground by her son’s sacrifice, despite the fact that many of her attackers have also lost sons (and daughters).

Maybe the “moral high ground” on these issues is like everything else in looneys’ lives: relative? Relative in the sense that if it agrees with your agenda and worldview, it’s correct, but if it doesn’t it’s immoral?

When will the relativist kooks get it through their heads it’s not “relative” that counts, it’s “relevant”.

I spose your gonna say something about Bush’s National Guard records now, I know you guys like to cut and paste, huh?

Cheers.

According to the March 10, 2004, Washington Post, “The Democratic 527 organizations have drawn support from some wealthy liberals determined to defeat Bush. They include financier George Soros who gave $1.46 million to MoveOn.org Voter Fund (in the form of matching funds to recruit additional small donors); Peter B. Lewis, chief executive of the Progressive Corp., who gave $500,000 to MoveOn.org Voter Fund; and Linda Pritzker, of the Hyatt hotel family, and her Sustainable World Corp., who gave $4 million to the joint fundraising committee.” [20]

So when are the Dems going to own up?

Not that Im holding my breath or anything.

Bob Perry, described by the Houston Chronicle last year as the single largest Texas donor to the Republican Party, contributed 4.5 million dollars [to the Swift Boat Vets].

Sort of speaks for itself.

And thanks for pointing out yet another difference. “Millions” is it? As apposed to a few vets who raised their own money and ran their own ads without getting the special one time good deal from a freindly New York Times.

Yes, please do run it again! And again, and again. Lets see how much that endears them to the American public, and remind them what a bunch of scum they really are.

I say again: funny how the republicans can dish it out, but can’t take it.

Can we post the ad again, please? Let’s make sure everyone sees it as much as possible.

Thats because Move On is carrying the water for them. They are doing the dirtytricks so they can all stay above it and act like its nothing.

The trade off, of course, is that they have to tacitly toe the radical screaming socialist line, until the election at least.

The plus side is that Americans who are paying any attention at all are seeing all the half assed excuse for answers, and if its one thing Americans want to hear from its candidates, its straight answers, which they are not getting on this kind of crap.

Could it be that the country agrees with MoveOn and Hillary? With conditions on the ground so diametrically opposed to what the Bush cabal claims (and with a history of being wrong on every count, that’s no stretch), the people — at least 70% of them — have come to the conclusion that the Iraq War was a mistake and we need to get out. Even the military, historically the republican’s purview, is shifting to the Democrats.

Nevertheless, I agree that MoveOn’s ad is the gift that keeps on giving. There is no way that MoveOn could have ever afforded the widespread coverage of the ad that it has received, and we all know that it is repetition in advertising that makes it work. If only you could post images in the comments section…

Could you post the ad again, please?