Game, Set, Match???

That’s the thought posed by Captain Ed in his post about this article. Here’s what’s got everyone’s tongues wagging:

The leader of Iraq’s banned Baath party, Izzat Ibrahim al-Douri, has decided to join efforts by the Iraqi authorities to fight al-Qaeda, one of the party’s former top officials, Abu Wisam al-Jashaami, told pan-Arab daily Al Hayat. “Al-Douri has decided to sever ties with al-Qaeda and sign up to the programme of the national resistance, which includes routing Islamist terrorists and opening up dialogue with the Baghdad government and foreign forces,” al-Jashaami said.

Al-Douri has decided to deal directly with US forces in Iraq, according to al-Jashaami. He figures in the 55-card deck of “most wanted” officials from the former Iraqi regime issued by the US government. In return, for cooperating in the fight against al-Qaeda, al-Douri has asked for guarantees over his men’s safety and for an end to Iraqi army attacks on his militias.

Recent weeks have seen a first step in this direction, when Baathist fighters cooperated with Iraqi government forces in hunting down al-Qaeda operatives in the volatile Diyala province and in several districts of the capital, Baghdad.

Al-Douri was the King of Clubs in the now infamous deck of cards of Iraq’s most wanted. Turning him would be a huge deal because he had been working with AQI and various insurgent groups. As the article points out, his turning happened as a direct result of Gen. Petraeus’ success in Anbar and Diyala.

This is potentially huge on several levels. If Maliki says that this happened as a direct result of Gen. Petraeus’ surge, Democrats will be betwixt and between. Here’s what Hillary said about President Bush’s surge speech:

The President simply has not gotten the message sent loudly and clearly by the American people, that we desperately need a new course. The President has not offered a new direction, instead he will continue to take us down the wrong road, only faster. The President’s speech failed to adequately address the political situation in Iraq, rising sectarian violence, mounting strain on our military, growing Iranian influence, and festering divides over how to distribute oil revenues.

As I have said, as the American people have demanded, and as the facts on the ground require, we need a new course and an end to the current failed policy. I continue to urge a strategy that places pressure on the Iraqi government to resolve the political crisis through phased redeployment of U.S. troops, establishes an Iraqi Oil Trust to end the stalemate over oil, and pursues an aggressive diplomatic strategy including an international conference of the regional parties to further the task of Iraq’s stability.”

Harry Reid and Nancy Pelosi issued a joint statement that sounded utterly defeatist:

“As many had foreseen, the escalation has failed to produce the intended results,” the two leaders wrote. “The increase in US forces has had little impact in curbing the violence or fostering political reconciliation. It has not enhanced Americas national security. The unsettling reality is that instances of violence against Iraqis remain high and attacks on US forces have increased. In fact, the last two months of the war were the deadliest to date for US troops.”

Months ago, Rush said that Democrats weren’t just betting on defeat. He said that they “owned defeat.” People might not like how the war was waged but they aren’t defeatists. They love winners.

This is potentially huge from the perspective that this might be the spark that’s needed to end the sectarian fighting and the insurgency. If it’s true that al-Douri has flipped allegiances, it also emasculates AQI. Another key thing that must happen is for Maliki to keep his promise of no retribution against al-Douri’s militias. If they’re brought into the government, then national reconciliation is possible.

TechnoratiTechnorati Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog

6 Responses to “Game, Set, Match???”

  1. Game, Set, Match??? at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source. Says:

    [...] Original post by Gary Gross and software by Elliott Back [...]

  2. SEW Says:

    I’m sure Dan Rather, Brian Williams, Couric and Olberman will be advancing this story non stop for several weeks. And headlines for NYTs?

  3. John Houghton Says:

    Screw the MSM. Things are happening and people are aware. NYT and its ilk will soon go down to the dumps….we can only hope. Rush is correct. The Dems are defeatists all across the board (save Lieberman).

  4. Mitch the Bitch Says:

    The “natural order” was that when a oompany loses money (continually) it/they will go out of business. Today we have massive Corp’s with massive umbrella’s that can be used to shield the “losers” forever. The NYT isn’t about making money at all it’s about the power of the media.

    To the libs losing others money is just plain and simply par for the course and just as above will continue forever.

    When “WE” can find the top tier and make that entity pay a hefty price for supporting the losers like the NYT then we have a course of action. Right now we are just meandering through lib hell.

  5. T. A. Gray Says:

    I’m sure Dan Rather, Brian Williams, Couric and Olberman will be advancing this story non stop for several weeks. And headlines for NYTs?

    They’ve already started. (by the way Rather’s gone now, Williams at NBC has taken over the head nodding/incredulent nuance/”uh-oh-here-we-go-again” voice inflection role).

  6. SEW Says:

    Rather is only almost gone, no thanks to Mark Cuban. However his brain is long departed.

Leave a Reply