<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Today and Always, Let Us Remember Them</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/military/324/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/military/324/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 17:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Support The Troops: Send Them A Note</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/military/324/comment-page-1/#comment-680</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Support The Troops: Send Them A Note</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jul 2005 17:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=324#comment-680</guid>
		<description>[...] med Forces. 	Faithfully yours, CaliforniaConservative.org&#8220; 	RELATED: Today and Always, Let Us Remember Them   Posted @ 9:19 am &#124; Permalink &#124;    	    No Responses  	&#38;raqu [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] med Forces. 	Faithfully yours, CaliforniaConservative.org&#8220; 	RELATED: Today and Always, Let Us Remember Them   Posted @ 9:19 am | Permalink |    	    No Responses  	&#38;raqu [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SoCalPundit</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/military/324/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>SoCalPundit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 23:12:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=324#comment-279</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;PHOTOBLOG: The Veterans Historical Plaza Grand Opening&lt;/strong&gt;

	In 2000, then Assemblyman George Runner led the effort, supported by Senator Pete Knight, to secure $250,000 in State funding through the Department of Veterans Affairs for land acquisition of one-half acre for a Santa Clarita Historical Veterans Plaz...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>PHOTOBLOG: The Veterans Historical Plaza Grand Opening</strong></p>
<p>	In 2000, then Assemblyman George Runner led the effort, supported by Senator Pete Knight, to secure $250,000 in State funding through the Department of Veterans Affairs for land acquisition of one-half acre for a Santa Clarita Historical Veterans Plaz&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amy Proctor</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/military/324/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>Amy Proctor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 22:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=324#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I wrote an article almost identical to this around Christmas time. &lt;a HREF="http://dumbgirl.squarespace.com/blog/2005/2/22/mosul-and-american-casualties.html#comments" rel="nofollow"&gt;&lt;B&gt;Mosul &#38; American Casualties&lt;/B&gt;&lt;/A&gt;  The point of your article is an excellent one:  that soldiers bend over backwards to prevent civilian casualties and are more proficient in doing so.  My husband is active duty and served in Iraq for a year (Feb.'03-Feb.'04) as an 82nd ABN DIV paratrooper and can personally attest to this.  At their own expense and to their own peril, soldiers take risks to ensure the safety of civilians.  

When the BBC reported that 60%+ of all civilian casualites were committed by American troops, they grossly misled (to be polite) the truth.  They neglected to mention that terrorists are responsible for the vast majority of all civilian casualties in Iraq.  Buzzards.

The casuality comparisons of various wars is a testament to the proficiency with which we're fighting the war in Iraq.  Although US soldiers of course have died and probably will die in Iraq, the casualty number is astoundingly low when compared with other engagements.  We're getting better at protecting civilians as well as our own soldiers because the military is becoming more sophisticated and precise.  

So when war protesters lament US casuality rates in Iraq, they're being disingenuous.  They don't care about the US soldier nor the Iraqi people.  They care about their personal agenda (social and moral Darwinism) and cannot offer a rebuttal for the low casualty rate in Iraq, particularly compared to previous wars, except to chant, "Unjust war!  Bush lied, people died!"  The reality is that this anti-war movement would have us still paying taxes to England, slavery in the South and Nazism &#38; Communism spreading throughout the world. Although they would never admit to it, the logical conclusion is exactly the same.

Good article.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wrote an article almost identical to this around Christmas time. <a HREF="http://dumbgirl.squarespace.com/blog/2005/2/22/mosul-and-american-casualties.html#comments" rel="nofollow"><b>Mosul &amp; American Casualties</b></a>  The point of your article is an excellent one:  that soldiers bend over backwards to prevent civilian casualties and are more proficient in doing so.  My husband is active duty and served in Iraq for a year (Feb.&#8217;03-Feb.&#8217;04) as an 82nd ABN DIV paratrooper and can personally attest to this.  At their own expense and to their own peril, soldiers take risks to ensure the safety of civilians.  </p>
<p>When the BBC reported that 60%+ of all civilian casualites were committed by American troops, they grossly misled (to be polite) the truth.  They neglected to mention that terrorists are responsible for the vast majority of all civilian casualties in Iraq.  Buzzards.</p>
<p>The casuality comparisons of various wars is a testament to the proficiency with which we&#8217;re fighting the war in Iraq.  Although US soldiers of course have died and probably will die in Iraq, the casualty number is astoundingly low when compared with other engagements.  We&#8217;re getting better at protecting civilians as well as our own soldiers because the military is becoming more sophisticated and precise.  </p>
<p>So when war protesters lament US casuality rates in Iraq, they&#8217;re being disingenuous.  They don&#8217;t care about the US soldier nor the Iraqi people.  They care about their personal agenda (social and moral Darwinism) and cannot offer a rebuttal for the low casualty rate in Iraq, particularly compared to previous wars, except to chant, &#8220;Unjust war!  Bush lied, people died!&#8221;  The reality is that this anti-war movement would have us still paying taxes to England, slavery in the South and Nazism &amp; Communism spreading throughout the world. Although they would never admit to it, the logical conclusion is exactly the same.</p>
<p>Good article.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/military/324/comment-page-1/#comment-277</link>
		<dc:creator>FullosseousFlap's Dental Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2005 20:18:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=324#comment-277</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Memorial Day: Thank You&lt;/strong&gt;

	
	President Bush&#8217;s Memorial Day Radio Address:
	THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This Memorial Day weekend, Americans pay tribute to those who have given their lives in the service of our nation. As we honor the members of our Armed Forces who have ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Memorial Day: Thank You</strong></p>
<p>	President Bush&#8217;s Memorial Day Radio Address:<br />
	THE PRESIDENT: Good morning. This Memorial Day weekend, Americans pay tribute to those who have given their lives in the service of our nation. As we honor the members of our Armed Forces who have &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

