<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Priorities?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 14:05:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-514068</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Aug 2007 14:14:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-514068</guid>
		<description>Phil,

You ae not rquired to read our comments.

See, that's what true "fairness" means.
The right to not read or listen to what one finds objectionable.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Phil,</p>
<p>You ae not rquired to read our comments.</p>
<p>See, that&#8217;s what true &#8220;fairness&#8221; means.<br />
The right to not read or listen to what one finds objectionable.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509985</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 02:58:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509985</guid>
		<description>Bottom-feeding knuckle draggers?  If you can find a text on grammar and spelling, sir, you would possibly find the proper placement of hyphens.  If you could comprehend the text, that is.

And "amalgamation"?  Wow!  Of course, "amalgam" would have fit more properly, but the "ation" added at least 15 cents to the word.

And finally, vulgarity fits a liberal's thought processes so well.  You may wish to look up the original meaning of "vulgar", and its synonyms.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom-feeding knuckle draggers?  If you can find a text on grammar and spelling, sir, you would possibly find the proper placement of hyphens.  If you could comprehend the text, that is.</p>
<p>And &#8220;amalgamation&#8221;?  Wow!  Of course, &#8220;amalgam&#8221; would have fit more properly, but the &#8220;ation&#8221; added at least 15 cents to the word.</p>
<p>And finally, vulgarity fits a liberal&#8217;s thought processes so well.  You may wish to look up the original meaning of &#8220;vulgar&#8221;, and its synonyms.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: phil</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509896</link>
		<dc:creator>phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Aug 2007 01:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509896</guid>
		<description>Cal,

I'll try to be charitible here, but I have observed that you blog is a tedious amalgamation of mindless bullshit which appears to cater specifically to a audience of bottom feeding knuckle-draggers.  About the best thing that one could possibly say about it is that nobody, not one sentient individual on the freaking planet, appears to give a shit.  My advice to you is to give up the blogging gig while you have a shred of dignity remaining.  

Good luck, and have a great day!

Best Regards,

Phil</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cal,</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll try to be charitible here, but I have observed that you blog is a tedious amalgamation of mindless bullshit which appears to cater specifically to a audience of bottom feeding knuckle-draggers.  About the best thing that one could possibly say about it is that nobody, not one sentient individual on the freaking planet, appears to give a shit.  My advice to you is to give up the blogging gig while you have a shred of dignity remaining.  </p>
<p>Good luck, and have a great day!</p>
<p>Best Regards,</p>
<p>Phil</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509252</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 17:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509252</guid>
		<description>Well, T.A., it was either say it like I did or accuse the donkeys (and jackass wannabees) of being flat-out frauds and liars whose only purpose in life is to control everyone else's lives.  I was trying to avoid an argument there.

Because most "rich" people have no or very little earned income (most of it is income of other sorts, taxed in different ways and in different percentages), the "soak-the-rich" schemes are automatically passed down to everyone else either by inclusion in the definition of "rich" or by higher prices, tremendously unfair to those the donkeys claim to care about so much.

In other words, a viper by any other name is still a pile of pig dung.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, T.A., it was either say it like I did or accuse the donkeys (and jackass wannabees) of being flat-out frauds and liars whose only purpose in life is to control everyone else&#8217;s lives.  I was trying to avoid an argument there.</p>
<p>Because most &#8220;rich&#8221; people have no or very little earned income (most of it is income of other sorts, taxed in different ways and in different percentages), the &#8220;soak-the-rich&#8221; schemes are automatically passed down to everyone else either by inclusion in the definition of &#8220;rich&#8221; or by higher prices, tremendously unfair to those the donkeys claim to care about so much.</p>
<p>In other words, a viper by any other name is still a pile of pig dung.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509129</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 16:01:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509129</guid>
		<description>I give them more credit than that Carlos, they know damn well gas taxes or soaking the rich will be passed on, and that eventually mebbe you'll have to ditch your SUV and buy a Goremobile save-the-planet- special.  Anything to keep you beholding the great and wonderful Our Lady of Social Progress Church.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I give them more credit than that Carlos, they know damn well gas taxes or soaking the rich will be passed on, and that eventually mebbe you&#8217;ll have to ditch your SUV and buy a Goremobile save-the-planet- special.  Anything to keep you beholding the great and wonderful Our Lady of Social Progress Church.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509095</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509095</guid>
		<description>Donkeys are too thick to figure out that if oil companies are taxed an additional $1 billion dollars, the price of gas at the pump will rise accordingly.

Doesn't even take a college professor to figure that one out, although I would question how many college professors (or even high school teachers) can or will.

Ultimately the donkeys' "soak-the-rich" schemes are paid for by consumers.

Doh!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Donkeys are too thick to figure out that if oil companies are taxed an additional $1 billion dollars, the price of gas at the pump will rise accordingly.</p>
<p>Doesn&#8217;t even take a college professor to figure that one out, although I would question how many college professors (or even high school teachers) can or will.</p>
<p>Ultimately the donkeys&#8217; &#8220;soak-the-rich&#8221; schemes are paid for by consumers.</p>
<p>Doh!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Houghton</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509062</link>
		<dc:creator>John Houghton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:06:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509062</guid>
		<description>The reason Dem's keep taxing things is because they have no 'real' plans out there.  They are reactionary.  And as mentioned, it is all about keeping tenure, (similar to unions), whether you are capable or not.  30 years is enough for this moron and his counterparts.  I still say TERM LIMITS!!!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The reason Dem&#8217;s keep taxing things is because they have no &#8216;real&#8217; plans out there.  They are reactionary.  And as mentioned, it is all about keeping tenure, (similar to unions), whether you are capable or not.  30 years is enough for this moron and his counterparts.  I still say TERM LIMITS!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What Priorities? at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/comment-page-1/#comment-509055</link>
		<dc:creator>What Priorities? at Conservative Times--Republican GOP news source.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Aug 2007 15:02:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/what-priorities/#comment-509055</guid>
		<description>[...] Original post by Gary Gross and software by Elliott Back [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Original post by Gary Gross and software by Elliott Back [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

