<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Waterboarding: Nowhere to Hide Now</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 15:46:38 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-757534</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 22:05:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-757534</guid>
		<description>Oh, you mean something along the lines of, "Harry Reid continues to torture patriotism."  Or how about, "Tubby continues to torture poverty."  Or maybe, Pelosi tortures bipartisanship."

The discussion, Rocky, was about the noun "torture," not the vt, and has to do with what constitutes the activity, not the sick twisting of old meanings to fit an agenda.

Sorry, it didn't go right over my head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, you mean something along the lines of, &#8220;Harry Reid continues to torture patriotism.&#8221;  Or how about, &#8220;Tubby continues to torture poverty.&#8221;  Or maybe, Pelosi tortures bipartisanship.&#8221;</p>
<p>The discussion, Rocky, was about the noun &#8220;torture,&#8221; not the vt, and has to do with what constitutes the activity, not the sick twisting of old meanings to fit an agenda.</p>
<p>Sorry, it didn&#8217;t go right over my head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-757063</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 16:48:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-757063</guid>
		<description>And by the way let me make something as clear I possibly can to everyone on this list, including Rocky

Compromising national security, or conspiring in the cover up or destruction  of classified information is neither politically noble nor very smart and healthy for anybodies sorry ass.  There is a reason in  this unfair and immoral world certain acts and information are classified.  

You people want to piss and moan about who got caught or what side knew what, when and where thats fine.

Rocky, I only pointed out that some of your favorite people are just as implicated as  those on whose watch it happened, by their spineless and complicit response to actions they had a moral as well as an official obligation to stop.

What should be alarming to us all is the inability of too many of our "leaders" to THINK CLEARLY and ACT FORCEFULLY with conviction to protect things which should be protected for everyone's security an safety.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And by the way let me make something as clear I possibly can to everyone on this list, including Rocky</p>
<p>Compromising national security, or conspiring in the cover up or destruction  of classified information is neither politically noble nor very smart and healthy for anybodies sorry ass.  There is a reason in  this unfair and immoral world certain acts and information are classified.  </p>
<p>You people want to piss and moan about who got caught or what side knew what, when and where thats fine.</p>
<p>Rocky, I only pointed out that some of your favorite people are just as implicated as  those on whose watch it happened, by their spineless and complicit response to actions they had a moral as well as an official obligation to stop.</p>
<p>What should be alarming to us all is the inability of too many of our &#8220;leaders&#8221; to THINK CLEARLY and ACT FORCEFULLY with conviction to protect things which should be protected for everyone&#8217;s security an safety.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-756019</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-756019</guid>
		<description>I knew usng Michelle would flip your knee jerk switch, Rocky.  Your so predictable.

Point is your side knew as well as the other side, didnt they?
and also prooved themselves just as gutless didnt they?  
And your proud of that? 

I hope not, you are smarter then they are I hope.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I knew usng Michelle would flip your knee jerk switch, Rocky.  Your so predictable.</p>
<p>Point is your side knew as well as the other side, didnt they?<br />
and also prooved themselves just as gutless didnt they?<br />
And your proud of that? </p>
<p>I hope not, you are smarter then they are I hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-755989</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 06:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-755989</guid>
		<description>Gosh, Carlos, I guess you didn't notice that I used the third definition of the word "torture" in my post, did you?  Just flew right over your head?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gosh, Carlos, I guess you didn&#8217;t notice that I used the third definition of the word &#8220;torture&#8221; in my post, did you?  Just flew right over your head?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-755950</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-755950</guid>
		<description>"In today’s republican party, no words have definitive meaning."

Rocky, leaving the rest of your mindless drivel aside, let me point out that 1)my comment about the Prez defining torture was more of an invitation to the readers to look up the definition in the dictionary so they would be aware of how it is really defined.  Obviously (but not surprisingly) that one passed right over your head.

And 2) the donkeys, libs and moonbats are the accomplished experts in using redefined words, to the detriment of society.  They are, quite frankly, the progeny of Huxley's "1984" "newspeak", and have honed their skills to an incredible degree.  I mean, what else can be said about this when the President of the United States, in a sworn deposition, declares 'It depends on what the definition of what "is" is.'

As far as the article goes, of course the writer had an agenda.  That's what's taught in J 1 classes now.  What's upsetting to the agenda media is that it was dissing the donkeys, something that is sacrilegious to the MSM now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;In today’s republican party, no words have definitive meaning.&#8221;</p>
<p>Rocky, leaving the rest of your mindless drivel aside, let me point out that 1)my comment about the Prez defining torture was more of an invitation to the readers to look up the definition in the dictionary so they would be aware of how it is really defined.  Obviously (but not surprisingly) that one passed right over your head.</p>
<p>And 2) the donkeys, libs and moonbats are the accomplished experts in using redefined words, to the detriment of society.  They are, quite frankly, the progeny of Huxley&#8217;s &#8220;1984&#8243; &#8220;newspeak&#8221;, and have honed their skills to an incredible degree.  I mean, what else can be said about this when the President of the United States, in a sworn deposition, declares &#8216;It depends on what the definition of what &#8220;is&#8221; is.&#8217;</p>
<p>As far as the article goes, of course the writer had an agenda.  That&#8217;s what&#8217;s taught in J 1 classes now.  What&#8217;s upsetting to the agenda media is that it was dissing the donkeys, something that is sacrilegious to the MSM now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rocky</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-755586</link>
		<dc:creator>Rocky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-755586</guid>
		<description>This piece -- and the comments -- just cries out for a thorough fisking, so here goes:

First, the article is rather biased.  Notice all the names it mentions?  Now, remember that this briefing was conducted while &lt;b&gt;the republicans&lt;/b&gt; were still in control of Congress.  So, we're not getting the full story here, and (face facts) had any Democrat broken their oath of secrecy, they would have been tried and convicted of treason, followed shortly by summary execution.  

Regarding the WaPo piece, it just reeks of Karl Rove: take a shred of truth -- that Pelosi was briefed -- and torture it to the point of nonrecognition.  

To suggest, however, that the Democrats take their cues from the ACLU and CAIR... say what?  Who do the republicans take their cues from?  Pastor Ted and toe-tapping Larry? Norm Podhoretz?  We've gotten ourselves in far more trouble listening to these and other rightwingnut fools.

For the record, Democrats do not care more about protecting terrorists' supposed rights than US citizens safety; but, as Thomas Jefferson said, "He who trades liberty for security deserves neither and will lose both."

And to the comments: George, there are two liars in the WH now that three-fourths of the citizens do not trust.  Of the entire slate of republican candidates, there is not one who does not have a trust issue to deal with.  Your partisan slander means nothing.

TA, first, quoting michelle malkin is reaching new depths.  She's so bad, nobody -- not even Fox Noise -- respects her anymore.  Setting MiMi's ridiculous and shrill whining aside, who are you to say what the Oversight Committee was told?  Remember, they have all sworn an oath of secrecy, and are expected to maintain it.  Again, smelling Rove's Machiavellian hand in this, it is one of those situations in which the Democrat would be damned if they spoke out, and now they're damned &lt;em&gt;for not speaking out&lt;/em&gt;.  Remember when you all went ape-sh*t over Sen. Rockefeller's &lt;a href="http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v002/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/20051219_Rockfellerletter.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;hand-written letter&lt;/a&gt; to Darth Cheney regarding the domestic spying scandal?

Vicki, on what planet are you living?  McCain should be president based on his stance against torture?  Gosh, that makes most of the country ready to assume office.   Your other point -- if you have one, it's that hard to tell from your collection of non sequiturs  -- is that Speaker Pelosi is not qualified for her position based on her position on waterboarding.  Assuming, for a moment, that she was for waterboarding at the time, but later, with the passage of time, realized the error of this position, you're saying that once a politician supports a position it should be cast in stone and never allowed to change, or they're branded defective.  Well, thinking people know otherwise.  Smart people understand that positions can and do change.  Not necessarily for the better, or do I need to remind you that just after 9/11 W said we'd catch bin Laden "dead or alive."  Fast-forward a couple of years, and it seems bin Laden is no longer even on Bush's radar.  

Finally, Carlos, I agree, the presnit needs to define torture for us.  Of course, with the verbal knots that come out of W's mouth, it will be difficult to reach any conclusion or understanding, and his definition is sure to change.  Kinda like how he said anyone caught leaking information in his administration would be "dealt with" a là Scooter Libby; we just didn't know that meant "pardoned."  In today's republican party, no words have definitive meaning.

There's more to this story than meets the eye.  And far more than stated in this piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This piece &#8212; and the comments &#8212; just cries out for a thorough fisking, so here goes:</p>
<p>First, the article is rather biased.  Notice all the names it mentions?  Now, remember that this briefing was conducted while <b>the republicans</b> were still in control of Congress.  So, we&#8217;re not getting the full story here, and (face facts) had any Democrat broken their oath of secrecy, they would have been tried and convicted of treason, followed shortly by summary execution.  </p>
<p>Regarding the WaPo piece, it just reeks of Karl Rove: take a shred of truth &#8212; that Pelosi was briefed &#8212; and torture it to the point of nonrecognition.  </p>
<p>To suggest, however, that the Democrats take their cues from the ACLU and CAIR&#8230; say what?  Who do the republicans take their cues from?  Pastor Ted and toe-tapping Larry? Norm Podhoretz?  We&#8217;ve gotten ourselves in far more trouble listening to these and other rightwingnut fools.</p>
<p>For the record, Democrats do not care more about protecting terrorists&#8217; supposed rights than US citizens safety; but, as Thomas Jefferson said, &#8220;He who trades liberty for security deserves neither and will lose both.&#8221;</p>
<p>And to the comments: George, there are two liars in the WH now that three-fourths of the citizens do not trust.  Of the entire slate of republican candidates, there is not one who does not have a trust issue to deal with.  Your partisan slander means nothing.</p>
<p>TA, first, quoting michelle malkin is reaching new depths.  She&#8217;s so bad, nobody &#8212; not even Fox Noise &#8212; respects her anymore.  Setting MiMi&#8217;s ridiculous and shrill whining aside, who are you to say what the Oversight Committee was told?  Remember, they have all sworn an oath of secrecy, and are expected to maintain it.  Again, smelling Rove&#8217;s Machiavellian hand in this, it is one of those situations in which the Democrat would be damned if they spoke out, and now they&#8217;re damned <em>for not speaking out</em>.  Remember when you all went ape-sh*t over Sen. Rockefeller&#8217;s <a href="http://a9.g.akamai.net/7/9/8082/v002/democratic1.download.akamai.com/8082/pdfs/20051219_Rockfellerletter.pdf" rel="nofollow">hand-written letter</a> to Darth Cheney regarding the domestic spying scandal?</p>
<p>Vicki, on what planet are you living?  McCain should be president based on his stance against torture?  Gosh, that makes most of the country ready to assume office.   Your other point &#8212; if you have one, it&#8217;s that hard to tell from your collection of non sequiturs  &#8212; is that Speaker Pelosi is not qualified for her position based on her position on waterboarding.  Assuming, for a moment, that she was for waterboarding at the time, but later, with the passage of time, realized the error of this position, you&#8217;re saying that once a politician supports a position it should be cast in stone and never allowed to change, or they&#8217;re branded defective.  Well, thinking people know otherwise.  Smart people understand that positions can and do change.  Not necessarily for the better, or do I need to remind you that just after 9/11 W said we&#8217;d catch bin Laden &#8220;dead or alive.&#8221;  Fast-forward a couple of years, and it seems bin Laden is no longer even on Bush&#8217;s radar.  </p>
<p>Finally, Carlos, I agree, the presnit needs to define torture for us.  Of course, with the verbal knots that come out of W&#8217;s mouth, it will be difficult to reach any conclusion or understanding, and his definition is sure to change.  Kinda like how he said anyone caught leaking information in his administration would be &#8220;dealt with&#8221; a là Scooter Libby; we just didn&#8217;t know that meant &#8220;pardoned.&#8221;  In today&#8217;s republican party, no words have definitive meaning.</p>
<p>There&#8217;s more to this story than meets the eye.  And far more than stated in this piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-755401</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Dec 2007 01:31:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-755401</guid>
		<description>Yeah, by their definition a pre 1980 Navy "crossing the line" or Chiefs initiation would be torture (having to crawl through fermented garbage, eat a certain Filipino delicacy, etc)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, by their definition a pre 1980 Navy &#8220;crossing the line&#8221; or Chiefs initiation would be torture (having to crawl through fermented garbage, eat a certain Filipino delicacy, etc)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-754480</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-754480</guid>
		<description>T.A.:  Doesn't matter, the MSM will keep that "inconvenient truth" out of their print and broadcasts.

As far as "torture" goes, the president (and conservatives in general) would do well to expose the definition of "torture" to the public, who has been taken by the donkeys, libs and media. The Prez has allowed them to redefine the term, and that's just plain wrong (and stupid on his and the party's part).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>T.A.:  Doesn&#8217;t matter, the MSM will keep that &#8220;inconvenient truth&#8221; out of their print and broadcasts.</p>
<p>As far as &#8220;torture&#8221; goes, the president (and conservatives in general) would do well to expose the definition of &#8220;torture&#8221; to the public, who has been taken by the donkeys, libs and media. The Prez has allowed them to redefine the term, and that&#8217;s just plain wrong (and stupid on his and the party&#8217;s part).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753733</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 07:23:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753733</guid>
		<description>Yet the Massachusetts blimp in his Scotch misted brain keeps foaming on. Does he even realize his own party was in on the coverup as well?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yet the Massachusetts blimp in his Scotch misted brain keeps foaming on. Does he even realize his own party was in on the coverup as well?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kalifornia Kafir</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753557</link>
		<dc:creator>Kalifornia Kafir</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 05:05:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753557</guid>
		<description>Back in 2002, Nancy Pelosi was all for waterboarding because if something happened to her or her family members, she'd want to see the perps pay or talk.  Then she went to Syria and her friend Bashur assured her that she &#38; hers would not be harmed. Change of heart.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Back in 2002, Nancy Pelosi was all for waterboarding because if something happened to her or her family members, she&#8217;d want to see the perps pay or talk.  Then she went to Syria and her friend Bashur assured her that she &amp; hers would not be harmed. Change of heart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ejercito</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753532</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ejercito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 04:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753532</guid>
		<description>The best policy regarding the CIA use of torture is "don't ask, don't tell".

If CIA agents are captured by the enemy, they will be punished as the enemy sees fit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The best policy regarding the CIA use of torture is &#8220;don&#8217;t ask, don&#8217;t tell&#8221;.</p>
<p>If CIA agents are captured by the enemy, they will be punished as the enemy sees fit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mullah cimoc</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753382</link>
		<dc:creator>mullah cimoc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 03:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753382</guid>
		<description>mullah cimoc say usa society so sick now.  not the free press.  just him war news blockade for keep ameriki mind control.  sex pill, him pornography, the wife swap but childen destroy.  now just to watch him cable tv.  more fat each day.  mexican each day working the so hard and love the family.  

ameriki man him heart turn sick accept satan and the kill torture and him 7-11 cheese nacho.

but the punish.  aztec and maya him take all land from ameriki.  this for punish.  ameriki the slut take LBT (low back tattoo) not to him children.  this to punish.  also not to cooking or love the child.  this the big punish.

ameriki each day get him fake news show to make the stupid.  how ameriki winning WWII but now just the decay and him daughter take meth and smoke the cigerette and dye the hair streak.  this so the ashame.

for true info ameriki needing letter write:  stop1984today@yahoo.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mullah cimoc say usa society so sick now.  not the free press.  just him war news blockade for keep ameriki mind control.  sex pill, him pornography, the wife swap but childen destroy.  now just to watch him cable tv.  more fat each day.  mexican each day working the so hard and love the family.  </p>
<p>ameriki man him heart turn sick accept satan and the kill torture and him 7-11 cheese nacho.</p>
<p>but the punish.  aztec and maya him take all land from ameriki.  this for punish.  ameriki the slut take LBT (low back tattoo) not to him children.  this to punish.  also not to cooking or love the child.  this the big punish.</p>
<p>ameriki each day get him fake news show to make the stupid.  how ameriki winning WWII but now just the decay and him daughter take meth and smoke the cigerette and dye the hair streak.  this so the ashame.</p>
<p>for true info ameriki needing letter write:  <a href="mailto:stop1984today@yahoo.com">stop1984today@yahoo.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: vicki hampton</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753334</link>
		<dc:creator>vicki hampton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 02:35:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753334</guid>
		<description>This is another reason that Senator McCain is the best man for the presidency. If he were president none of this would have ever took place. the worse thing that could have happened was to give that fruitcake any type power, let alone made her speaker of the house. Well there is one thing to be learned from this and that is that this will never happen again,because she has been such a disaster that there will never be another women in that position and that should sum up hillary's chances.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is another reason that Senator McCain is the best man for the presidency. If he were president none of this would have ever took place. the worse thing that could have happened was to give that fruitcake any type power, let alone made her speaker of the house. Well there is one thing to be learned from this and that is that this will never happen again,because she has been such a disaster that there will never be another women in that position and that should sum up hillary&#8217;s chances.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: T. A. Gray</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753260</link>
		<dc:creator>T. A. Gray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:54:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753260</guid>
		<description>It is worth noting that the CIA actually informed members of Congress about the tapes four years ago and also informed them in advance about their intention to ultimately destroy the tapes. One leading Democrat admits he knew about the destruction of the tapes last fall. Via AP:
Rep. Jane Harman of California, then the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, was one of only four members of Congress in 2003 informed of the tapes’ existence and the CIA’s intention to ultimately destroy them.
“I told the CIA that destroying videotapes of interrogations was a bad idea and urged them in writing not to do it,” Harman said. While key lawmakers were briefed on the CIA’s intention to destroy the tapes, they were not notified two years later when the spy agency actually carried out the plan. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said the committee only learned of the tapes’ destruction in November 2006.
They knew and they did nothing.
http://michellemalkin.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is worth noting that the CIA actually informed members of Congress about the tapes four years ago and also informed them in advance about their intention to ultimately destroy the tapes. One leading Democrat admits he knew about the destruction of the tapes last fall. Via AP:<br />
Rep. Jane Harman of California, then the senior Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, was one of only four members of Congress in 2003 informed of the tapes’ existence and the CIA’s intention to ultimately destroy them.<br />
“I told the CIA that destroying videotapes of interrogations was a bad idea and urged them in writing not to do it,” Harman said. While key lawmakers were briefed on the CIA’s intention to destroy the tapes, they were not notified two years later when the spy agency actually carried out the plan. Senate Intelligence Committee Chairman Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., said the committee only learned of the tapes’ destruction in November 2006.<br />
They knew and they did nothing.<br />
<a href="http://michellemalkin.com/" rel="nofollow">http://michellemalkin.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/comment-page-1/#comment-753218</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 01:24:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/waterboarding-nowhere-to-hide-now/#comment-753218</guid>
		<description>There is not two democrats that i would trust in the white house.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is not two democrats that i would trust in the white house.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

