<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Tax Increases and Small Businesses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/tax-increases-and-small-businesses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/tax-increases-and-small-businesses/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 13:06:32 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/tax-increases-and-small-businesses/comment-page-1/#comment-143790</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 03:11:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2949#comment-143790</guid>
		<description>O.K., Gary, so what you're saying is that it's not o.k. to have a Republican-controlled Congress (Senate &#38; House) allow certain tax breaks to sunset.  Think about that for a couple of minutes.

All right, now that you've thought about that, why should we vote for a "republican" senator who votes for amnesty, votes against permanent tax cuts and the death tax, and generally lets Dingy Harry and Chucky Cheesy set policy for the Republican party?  At least the donkeys are honest enough to tell us they'll increase taxes and vote to sprinkle holy water on illegals to change them into honorable citizens.

And insurance?  I am lucky, because I'm covered by my wife's (she works for the guvmint), but couldn't pay for it if she didn't.  The only way insurance will ever be affordable for me again is if all medical help is refused to illegals and mandatory insurance is made illegal.  Excess profits for oil?  Check out the insurance industry.

Finally, I shudder to think of an Algore or Frenchy leading this nation, but RINO's, including Mr. Bush, are leading into economic chaos and destruction just as fast as any donkey would or could.  The SCOTUS argument is the only valid one for voting Republican or voting at all, and at this point, it's nearly a moot point, anyway.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>O.K., Gary, so what you&#8217;re saying is that it&#8217;s not o.k. to have a Republican-controlled Congress (Senate &amp; House) allow certain tax breaks to sunset.  Think about that for a couple of minutes.</p>
<p>All right, now that you&#8217;ve thought about that, why should we vote for a &#8220;republican&#8221; senator who votes for amnesty, votes against permanent tax cuts and the death tax, and generally lets Dingy Harry and Chucky Cheesy set policy for the Republican party?  At least the donkeys are honest enough to tell us they&#8217;ll increase taxes and vote to sprinkle holy water on illegals to change them into honorable citizens.</p>
<p>And insurance?  I am lucky, because I&#8217;m covered by my wife&#8217;s (she works for the guvmint), but couldn&#8217;t pay for it if she didn&#8217;t.  The only way insurance will ever be affordable for me again is if all medical help is refused to illegals and mandatory insurance is made illegal.  Excess profits for oil?  Check out the insurance industry.</p>
<p>Finally, I shudder to think of an Algore or Frenchy leading this nation, but RINO&#8217;s, including Mr. Bush, are leading into economic chaos and destruction just as fast as any donkey would or could.  The SCOTUS argument is the only valid one for voting Republican or voting at all, and at this point, it&#8217;s nearly a moot point, anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

