<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Scalia Dismisses &#8216;Living Constitution&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/scalia-dismisses-living-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/scalia-dismisses-living-constitution/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 12:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Conservative Culture &#187; The Constitution - As written and intended</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/scalia-dismisses-living-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-98219</link>
		<dc:creator>Conservative Culture &#187; The Constitution - As written and intended</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2276#comment-98219</guid>
		<description>[...] The &#8216;living breathing&#8217; document is the activist code for being able to ignore original intent and to discover new things never envisioned from the document. California Conservative also draws this quote and reveals just how inflexible the activists are once they twist the Constitution to where they want it. Proponents of the living constitution want matters to be decided Ã¢â‚¬Å“not by the people, but by the justices of the Supreme Court. They are not looking for legal flexibility, they are looking for rigidity, whether itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the right to abortion or the right to homosexual activity, they want that right to be embedded from coast to coast and to be unchangeable,Ã¢â‚¬Â he said. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The &#8216;living breathing&#8217; document is the activist code for being able to ignore original intent and to discover new things never envisioned from the document. California Conservative also draws this quote and reveals just how inflexible the activists are once they twist the Constitution to where they want it. Proponents of the living constitution want matters to be decided Ã¢â‚¬Å“not by the people, but by the justices of the Supreme Court. They are not looking for legal flexibility, they are looking for rigidity, whether itÃ¢â‚¬â„¢s the right to abortion or the right to homosexual activity, they want that right to be embedded from coast to coast and to be unchangeable,Ã¢â‚¬Â he said. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/scalia-dismisses-living-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-97664</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:08:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2276#comment-97664</guid>
		<description>Unfortunately, Bader-Ginzberg doesn't see the Constitution as a living document, either, and I'm fast coming to the belief that most moonbats don't.  What they, especially her, see it as is dead meat to be rewritten in any way they see fit.

Too bad they don't have the experience of living under regal fiat as the writers of the document did.  Maybe then they'd think seriously about how it stood the test of time until activists and ideologues like them got into it.  

We don't need a communist country, as opposed to what the A.C.L.U. believes and works toward.  What we need is to get back to the single document that made more difference than any single person or writing has to make this nation great, and a world leader.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunately, Bader-Ginzberg doesn&#8217;t see the Constitution as a living document, either, and I&#8217;m fast coming to the belief that most moonbats don&#8217;t.  What they, especially her, see it as is dead meat to be rewritten in any way they see fit.</p>
<p>Too bad they don&#8217;t have the experience of living under regal fiat as the writers of the document did.  Maybe then they&#8217;d think seriously about how it stood the test of time until activists and ideologues like them got into it.  </p>
<p>We don&#8217;t need a communist country, as opposed to what the A.C.L.U. believes and works toward.  What we need is to get back to the single document that made more difference than any single person or writing has to make this nation great, and a world leader.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

