San Francisco: Liberalism Is Always In Fashion And Intolerance Is Tailored

Marc Jacobs - LogoBut some will never have a sense of style.

(via Michelle Malkin): “Fashion designer Marc Jacobs has a tony boutique in San Francisco. The SF Chronicle’s Leah Garchick noticed something big in the store’s window–a literal sign of Bush Derangement Syndrome”

Internet photojournalist/documentarian Zombie e-mails notice of an exclusive photo essay at Zombietime.com featuring the store display.

See photos and read the story here.

It’s not about creative marketing, it’s about pandering.

Some might call Marc Jacobs daring. In truth, it’s nothing more than a pathetic preaching to the choir, and an arrogant assumption that everyone must agree. In San Francisco, conservatives don’t count because, mostly, they’re afraid to speak out.

As Marc Jacob proves, feedom of speech doesn’t fit for all. And it certainly doesn’t wear well either.

UPDATE: (6/06)
Michelle Malkin: “Moonbat Fashion Show”
Hot Air

UPDATE: For consumer feedback, here’s the info:

Marc Jacobs
Public Relations

212.966.0782
General & Advertising
Kate Waters
k.waters@marcjacobs.com

Marc Jacobs
2142 Fillmore Street
415-447-9322 T
415-292-7895 F

2 Responses to “San Francisco: Liberalism Is Always In Fashion And Intolerance Is Tailored”

  1. Robert Says:

    BDS, that’s good stuff.

    Just like SDS. Sure you can make believe you are against the way Saddam fought against Islamofacists (torture, dividing his country, etc), but everyone knows it’s just Saddam Derangement Syndrome.
    you’d have to be deranged to believe it was his actions.

    C’mon, how many of these loonies screaming about Saddam were against his dictatorship before 2001?
    Where was Hitchens? Where was Steyn? Where was Cheney? Scratch that last one, Cheney was doing business with him.

  2. Jonathan Says:

    Robert, maybe you had your head in the sand (or somewhere else for that matter), but the critics that you named along with a chorus of others were decrying Saddam and his tactics well long before 2001. Read much? Obviously not. But kudos on your sophomoric attempt at moral relativism.

Leave a Reply