California Conservative

via Newsmax:

“If America is going to wage a new kind of war against terrorism, it must act on all fronts, including the financial one,” a newspaper editorialized on September 24, 2001 — just 13 days after the terrorist strikes of 9/11.
. . .

That same newspaper has now betrayed the very operation it was then urging on the Bush administration. That newspaper, of course, is the New York Times, now rapidly taking on the role of Osama bin Laden’s reliable informant.

* * *

Publisher’s note: The Times wouldn’t have done this if Al Gore were in office. Instead, they’d surely be praising his valiant efforts at fighting terrorism on all levels, while at the same time single-handedly lowering the earth’s temperature to reduce global warming. That’s why it’s called liberal media bias.

UPDATE:
“That the press wouldn’t have better sense than to leak critical information on terrorists so that they know what we’re doing — that scares the devil out of me…

“In my opinion, that is giving aid and comfort to the enemy; therefore it is an act of treason … What you write in a war and what is legal to do for the federal government, or state government, whoever it is, is very important in winning the war on terror.” — Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Ky.

RELATED:
U.S. Treasury To New York Times: “Irresponsible”

Technorati Tags: Homeland Security, NSA, Terrorism, NY Times, U.S. Treasury

This entry was posted on Wednesday, June 28th, 2006 at 10:18 am and is filed under Homeland Security, Liberals, Media, Subversives, Terrorism. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.