Comments on: Quality & Accessability vs. Affordability & Accessability? http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/quality-accessability-vs-affordability-accessability/ Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM) Sat, 26 May 2012 09:38:37 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: USN Ret. http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/quality-accessability-vs-affordability-accessability/comment-page-1/#comment-2295560 USN Ret. Tue, 30 Jun 2009 15:46:31 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=7123#comment-2295560 We'll be forced you into it one way or an another. Either you'll have to accept or pay more into medicare to keep your own coverage, or the insurance companies will throw in the towel when their costs out balance the risks. Plus like anything else the govewrnment gets its hands on, it'll turn into a medical IRS with a code so voluminous and Byzantine nobody will ever get a straight answer from it. We’ll be forced you into it one way or an another.

Either you’ll have to accept or pay more into medicare to keep your own coverage, or the insurance companies will throw in the towel when their costs out balance the risks.

Plus like anything else the govewrnment gets its hands on, it’ll turn into a medical IRS with a code so voluminous and Byzantine nobody will ever get a straight answer from it.

]]> By: SEW http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/quality-accessability-vs-affordability-accessability/comment-page-1/#comment-2289663 SEW Sun, 28 Jun 2009 21:35:47 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=7123#comment-2289663 It's all about illegal price controls by the government. It may cost $1.00 to provide the service, the government will pay 70c. Is there any other business in America that has price controls? Take it or fold your business. Cut your overhead, spend less time with the patient and don't treat those that will cost you money to treat in addition to the liability risk involved. End result is rationing of care and withholding treatment. Both the consumer and provider is not allowed to charge more or pay more than the amount the government pays unless the provider is not part of the system in which case he doesn't have enough paying patients. Everyone is in the public option plan, backed by government IOUs. It’s all about illegal price controls by the government. It may cost $1.00 to provide the service, the government will pay 70c. Is there any other business in America that has price controls? Take it or fold your business. Cut your overhead, spend less time with the patient and don’t treat those that will cost you money to treat in addition to the liability risk involved. End result is rationing of care and withholding treatment. Both the consumer and provider is not allowed to charge more or pay more than the amount the government pays unless the provider is not part of the system in which case he doesn’t have enough paying patients. Everyone is in the public option plan, backed by government IOUs.

]]>