<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Propaganda Central</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:28:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175995</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175995</guid>
		<description>ANWR?

Right, because the US doesn't do enough to help energy companies benefit to the detriment of its citizens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ANWR?</p>
<p>Right, because the US doesn&#8217;t do enough to help energy companies benefit to the detriment of its citizens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175981</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 16:23:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175981</guid>
		<description>Gary, I'd rather a moderate Republican get elected than a big government conservative.  I'm tired of deficit spending and interference with state's rights and individual rights by the GOP.

And I do live in a Republican district, so Republican in fact that my Congressman is running unopposed.  I'll just be withholding my vote.

And I'm not sending a message - I am exercising &lt;i&gt;my right&lt;/i&gt; to vote how I choose.  I have made a determination that neither party represents my rather libertarian point of view and that divided government would be the best situation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Gary, I&#8217;d rather a moderate Republican get elected than a big government conservative.  I&#8217;m tired of deficit spending and interference with state&#8217;s rights and individual rights by the GOP.</p>
<p>And I do live in a Republican district, so Republican in fact that my Congressman is running unopposed.  I&#8217;ll just be withholding my vote.</p>
<p>And I&#8217;m not sending a message - I am exercising <i>my right</i> to vote how I choose.  I have made a determination that neither party represents my rather libertarian point of view and that divided government would be the best situation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175506</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 05:17:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175506</guid>
		<description>KG, Thanks for essentially voting Democrat. I hope you don't live in a Republican district. If you do, I'd be mightily upset. This notion that you're sending a message is foolish. The only message that gets sent is that the only Republicans getting elected will be moderates. NICE MESSAGE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>KG, Thanks for essentially voting Democrat. I hope you don&#8217;t live in a Republican district. If you do, I&#8217;d be mightily upset. This notion that you&#8217;re sending a message is foolish. The only message that gets sent is that the only Republicans getting elected will be moderates. NICE MESSAGE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KG</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175501</link>
		<dc:creator>KG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 04:36:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175501</guid>
		<description>Honestly, this thing doesn't affect my energy level.

I'm fed up with the national GOP and have no intention of voting for any Republican running for federal office come November.  (Un)Fortunately, I am equally fed up with the California Democratic party and will most likely be voting Republican on all state offices (with the possible exception of AG).

It was a cheap stunt to quell the resistence to big government conservativism that has taken over the party.  On some levels I hope it backfires.  If only to remind the national party what we send them to DC to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honestly, this thing doesn&#8217;t affect my energy level.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m fed up with the national GOP and have no intention of voting for any Republican running for federal office come November.  (Un)Fortunately, I am equally fed up with the California Democratic party and will most likely be voting Republican on all state offices (with the possible exception of AG).</p>
<p>It was a cheap stunt to quell the resistence to big government conservativism that has taken over the party.  On some levels I hope it backfires.  If only to remind the national party what we send them to DC to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gary Gross</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175495</link>
		<dc:creator>Gary Gross</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 03:02:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175495</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Kennedy meant to say he was an independent drinker.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

The Kennedy they're talking about is MARK Kennedy, not Tubby. DFL.org is a blog that rips on Republicans and that's what they were doing there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Kennedy meant to say he was an independent drinker.</p></blockquote>
<p>The Kennedy they&#8217;re talking about is MARK Kennedy, not Tubby. DFL.org is a blog that rips on Republicans and that&#8217;s what they were doing there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fred</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175493</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 02:36:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175493</guid>
		<description>â€œSo when Kennedy says heâ€™s an independent thinkerâ€

Kennedy meant to say he was an independent drinker.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>â€œSo when Kennedy says heâ€™s an independent thinkerâ€</p>
<p>Kennedy meant to say he was an independent drinker.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175492</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:40:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175492</guid>
		<description>Entitlement programs.....
Like the Republican prescription drug program?
Like the current Department of Defense budget?
Before we cast stones, let's remember who's had control of Congress since 1994 and who's had control of both that and the presidency since 2000. If the entitlement programs haven't gone away, and government hasn't gotten smaller, you don't need to look to the other side of the aisle for someone to blame.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Entitlement programs&#8230;..<br />
Like the Republican prescription drug program?<br />
Like the current Department of Defense budget?<br />
Before we cast stones, let&#8217;s remember who&#8217;s had control of Congress since 1994 and who&#8217;s had control of both that and the presidency since 2000. If the entitlement programs haven&#8217;t gone away, and government hasn&#8217;t gotten smaller, you don&#8217;t need to look to the other side of the aisle for someone to blame.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175487</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175487</guid>
		<description>So Tubby doesn't believe in discriminatory legislation?  What about the death tax?  Or, for that matter, any tax at all?  They all discriminate against those of us willing to go out and bust our butts trying to make an honest buck.

What about his (and McCan't's) amnesty bill?  That discriminates against anyone who has an honest job in this country.

What about his whiney stoppage of the wind farm?  That discriminates against anyone who uses electricity in his particular region of the country.

What about all his welfare/entitlement goodies?  Those all discriminate against anyone with a lick of sense (which automatically leaves out nearly all the donkeys in Congress) and who has the sense to earn their own feelings.

What he really means when he says what he did is that he objects to anyone proposing anything that could be remotely connected to having a moral standard.

'Course, if I had beaten a murder rap, maybe I would, too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So Tubby doesn&#8217;t believe in discriminatory legislation?  What about the death tax?  Or, for that matter, any tax at all?  They all discriminate against those of us willing to go out and bust our butts trying to make an honest buck.</p>
<p>What about his (and McCan&#8217;t&#8217;s) amnesty bill?  That discriminates against anyone who has an honest job in this country.</p>
<p>What about his whiney stoppage of the wind farm?  That discriminates against anyone who uses electricity in his particular region of the country.</p>
<p>What about all his welfare/entitlement goodies?  Those all discriminate against anyone with a lick of sense (which automatically leaves out nearly all the donkeys in Congress) and who has the sense to earn their own feelings.</p>
<p>What he really means when he says what he did is that he objects to anyone proposing anything that could be remotely connected to having a moral standard.</p>
<p>&#8216;Course, if I had beaten a murder rap, maybe I would, too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175485</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 01:02:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175485</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Senate set to reject gay marriage ban&lt;/strong&gt;

President Bush offered a new pledge of support Monday for a constitutional amendment that would ban </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Senate set to reject gay marriage ban</strong></p>
<p>President Bush offered a new pledge of support Monday for a constitutional amendment that would ban</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pangur Ban</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175482</link>
		<dc:creator>Pangur Ban</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175482</guid>
		<description>"because I know what a Democratic House and/or Senate would do to the moral climate in America"

Indeed.  We've already seen what a Democratic Executive can do in re morals... :/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;because I know what a Democratic House and/or Senate would do to the moral climate in America&#8221;</p>
<p>Indeed.  We&#8217;ve already seen what a Democratic Executive can do in re morals&#8230; :/</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Propaganda Central</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/propaganda-central/comment-page-1/#comment-175480</link>
		<dc:creator>Let Freedom Ring &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Propaganda Central</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jun 2006 00:03:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3256#comment-175480</guid>
		<description>[...] Cross-posted at California Conservative   Categories: General &#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Cross-posted at California Conservative   Categories: General | [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

