<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Prop. 77: Voter Empowerment</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 09:27:48 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; What Happened To California&#8217;s Districts?</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/comment-page-1/#comment-46238</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; What Happened To California&#8217;s Districts?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 21:22:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1334#comment-46238</guid>
		<description>[...] RELATED: Prop. 77: Voter Empowerment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] RELATED: Prop. 77: Voter Empowerment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; &#8220;Judgment Day&#8221;: Coverage of California&#8217;s Special Election</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/comment-page-1/#comment-46235</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; &#8220;Judgment Day&#8221;: Coverage of California&#8217;s Special Election</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 20:46:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1334#comment-46235</guid>
		<description>[...] Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Reform Initiatives: Prop. 74: Teacher Tenure/Education Reform Prop. 75: Paycheck Protection Prop. 76: State Spending Limit Prop. 77: Redistricting [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Reform Initiatives: Prop. 74: Teacher Tenure/Education Reform Prop. 75: Paycheck Protection Prop. 76: State Spending Limit Prop. 77: Redistricting [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; Attacking Arnold: What They&#8217;re Saying</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/comment-page-1/#comment-46183</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; Attacking Arnold: What They&#8217;re Saying</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Nov 2005 12:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1334#comment-46183</guid>
		<description>[...] Prop. 77 &#8220;Republican redistricting ploy&#8230;&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Prop. 77 &#8220;Republican redistricting ploy&#8230;&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jhn1</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/comment-page-1/#comment-45239</link>
		<dc:creator>jhn1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Nov 2005 20:03:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1334#comment-45239</guid>
		<description>This sounds like a "feel-good" solution.
"Retired judges chosen by legislature" are incapable of replicating the current by ...?
What they needed is some clause requiring various borders to be straight or following terrain separations except for minimum "zigs" to accomodate population equalization.
Without something like that, this is just making a separate group responsible for continuing the "same-old, same-old".
P.S. do you think the various districts and such that are such safe seats will still vote for the same politician, but vote to change the district borders to allow them to vote for somebody else?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a &#8220;feel-good&#8221; solution.<br />
&#8220;Retired judges chosen by legislature&#8221; are incapable of replicating the current by &#8230;?<br />
What they needed is some clause requiring various borders to be straight or following terrain separations except for minimum &#8220;zigs&#8221; to accomodate population equalization.<br />
Without something like that, this is just making a separate group responsible for continuing the &#8220;same-old, same-old&#8221;.<br />
P.S. do you think the various districts and such that are such safe seats will still vote for the same politician, but vote to change the district borders to allow them to vote for somebody else?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; November 8th: California&#8217;s Special Election and Gov. Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Initiatives</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/prop-77-voter-empowerment/comment-page-1/#comment-43017</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; November 8th: California&#8217;s Special Election and Gov. Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Initiatives</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Nov 2005 00:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1334#comment-43017</guid>
		<description>[...] November 8th: California&#8217;s Special Election and Gov. Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Initiatives &#187; Prop. 77: Voter Empowerment &#187; Prop. 76: Control Government Spending &#187; Prop. 75:Paycheck Protection &#187; Prop. 74: Education Reform &#187; What Now?! History Repeats Itself &#187; California Conservatives Must Vote &#187; Babbling Boxer: Fisking The Senator&#8217;s Statements on Miers&#8217; Withdrawal &#187; Michelle Malkin&#8217;s Unhinged &#187; &#8220;Scalito&#8217;s Way&#8221; &#8212; The Alito Nomination: Reactions from the Blogosphere &#187; Confirm Judge Alito &#187; Bush to Nominate Alito to Supreme Court &#187; WHAT ALEX SAID&#8211;And Why We Should Listen &#187; MSM Needs A Punch In The Nose &#187; Berlusconi Election: &#8220;I Tried to Stop Bush&#8221; &#187; Halloween Horror in S. California &#187; LA Unified: Sucking Taxpayers Dry &#187; The Establishment Strikes Back, Part III &#187; Technology Sure to Piss the ACLU Off &#187; Sunnis Signing Up Candidate Lists  List all posts &#187; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] November 8th: California&#8217;s Special Election and Gov. Schwarzenegger&#8217;s Initiatives &raquo; Prop. 77: Voter Empowerment &raquo; Prop. 76: Control Government Spending &raquo; Prop. 75:Paycheck Protection &raquo; Prop. 74: Education Reform &raquo; What Now?! History Repeats Itself &raquo; California Conservatives Must Vote &raquo; Babbling Boxer: Fisking The Senator&#8217;s Statements on Miers&#8217; Withdrawal &raquo; Michelle Malkin&#8217;s Unhinged &raquo; &#8220;Scalito&#8217;s Way&#8221; &#8212; The Alito Nomination: Reactions from the Blogosphere &raquo; Confirm Judge Alito &raquo; Bush to Nominate Alito to Supreme Court &raquo; WHAT ALEX SAID&#8211;And Why We Should Listen &raquo; MSM Needs A Punch In The Nose &raquo; Berlusconi Election: &#8220;I Tried to Stop Bush&#8221; &raquo; Halloween Horror in S. California &raquo; LA Unified: Sucking Taxpayers Dry &raquo; The Establishment Strikes Back, Part III &raquo; Technology Sure to Piss the ACLU Off &raquo; Sunnis Signing Up Candidate Lists  List all posts &raquo; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

