Comments on: Nanny State Extends to Newspapers

By: Carlos

Carlos — Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:30:31 +0000

That’s one of the things that frustrates the left to no end: conservative talk radio doesn’t need bailed out. They have (generally speaking) an abundant audience and hence, they have advertising at a good rate that supports their further use of the radio waves because the station owners are making money (how quaintly evil!). That’s why leftist radio does not succeed (except in anecdotal cases), and why the “Fairness Doctrine”, no matter what guise or name the donkeys or president put on it, must be defeated and sent into oblivion.

If the “Fairness Doctrine” in any form does become law, look for radio stations to start dropping like flies, too.

By: USN Ret.

USN Ret. — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:07:17 +0000

Bet tyey wouldn’t bail them out if they were all like conservative talk radio.
Course, if they were, they probabvly wouldn’t all be going in hock.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 18:38:54 +0000

Heck, I’m old enough I’d love to read the paper in the morning, but I’m not going to support the local church bulletin for the Church of Obama’s Grace where I live. I’ll just stick to the “news” I get on Yahoo! and bits and pieces from many blogs (right and left) to fill in.

And on a similar note, even if a NYT Sunday edition was 1% of the cost of one of its shares, it would still be overpriced. If the donks succeed in bailing out newspapers (which, in effect, nationalizes them just like in Venezuela) you can bet the farm that Schulzberger will be at the front of the line. He’s already there getting his marching orders daily from His Hollowness and his toadies.

By: Ron K

Ron K — Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:01:26 +0000

the biggest part of the problem is they are not reporting the NEWS, everything has a slant, whether it is liberal, progressive or what not. the newspapers are trying to be what radio is, regional or national not local, so why read it.