Comments on: Dick Morris’ Predictions http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/morris-predictions/ Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM) Sat, 26 May 2012 07:40:32 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/morris-predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-200604 Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Fri, 23 Jun 2006 02:34:11 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3366#comment-200604 <strong>Ex-Bush official convicted in Abramoff probe</strong> A jury found former Bush administration official David Safavian guilty today of covering up his deal Ex-Bush official convicted in Abramoff probe

A jury found former Bush administration official David Safavian guilty today of covering up his deal

]]> By: Mac http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/morris-predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-200556 Mac Thu, 22 Jun 2006 22:08:24 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3366#comment-200556 Never forget that Morris has a track record - and that record says he was one of the big reasons that Bill Clinton won. Both times. It was Dick Morris' insight and "fingers on the pulse" that helped one of least qualified and most sinister humans on the planet into the White House. Perhaps... his wife too before it's all over with. If Bill Clinton hadn't won a second term, his wife would certainly not have done as well in a senatorial race, and almost certainly wouldn't be a front-runner now. Morris may have his problems, but you can't discount his track record. It was Morris' vision and polling that helped a disgraced and impeached man hold on to the Whitehouse for TWO terms. Ignore him at your peril. And... respectfully, if you don't believe that people are angry about gas prices, and won't hold Bush responsible, I think you're in for a surprise this November. People are OUTRAGED by what's happening at the pump. And the GOP is going to pay for that outrage. I promise you. To me, it's a testiment really to the left's unbelievable STOOPIDITY that they haven't made more out of Bush = Oil Man = $3.50 gasoline. My guess is that sometime between now and Novemember, someone will wise them up. Never forget that Morris has a track record - and that record says he was one of the big reasons that Bill Clinton won. Both times. It was Dick Morris’ insight and “fingers on the pulse” that helped one of least qualified and most sinister humans on the planet into the White House. Perhaps… his wife too before it’s all over with.

If Bill Clinton hadn’t won a second term, his wife would certainly not have done as well in a senatorial race, and almost certainly wouldn’t be a front-runner now.

Morris may have his problems, but you can’t discount his track record. It was Morris’ vision and polling that helped a disgraced and impeached man hold on to the Whitehouse for TWO terms.

Ignore him at your peril.

And… respectfully, if you don’t believe that people are angry about gas prices, and won’t hold Bush responsible, I think you’re in for a surprise this November.

People are OUTRAGED by what’s happening at the pump. And the GOP is going to pay for that outrage. I promise you.

To me, it’s a testiment really to the left’s unbelievable STOOPIDITY that they haven’t made more out of Bush = Oil Man = $3.50 gasoline. My guess is that sometime between now and Novemember, someone will wise them up.

]]> By: Karl Maher http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/morris-predictions/comment-page-1/#comment-200335 Karl Maher Thu, 22 Jun 2006 16:09:53 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=3366#comment-200335 Morris this week and also in last week's Hill column (forecasting a "GOP wipeout") seems to be betting heavily on a D win, with not much supporting data. I note his <a href="http://karlmaher.blogspot.com/2006/06/dicks-strange-investment.html" rel="nofollow">insistence in both columns</a> that gas prices will drive the electoral result. Morris this week and also in last week’s Hill column (forecasting a “GOP wipeout”) seems to be betting heavily on a D win, with not much supporting data. I note his insistence in both columns that gas prices will drive the electoral result.

]]>