Comments on: Mark Foley: Homosexual Pedophile

By: George bush's mom

George bush's mom — Fri, 20 Oct 2006 14:00:13 +0000

I have few things to say about this.The comments by Rich Herb left me disturbed and intrested in the stupidity of some people.I’m pretty sure the reason why mark foley isn’t called a “homo pedophile”LOL is because whats important is that he’s a pedophile not a homosexual.It would be disturbing aswell if he raped a little girl “a hetero pedophile”LOL.After all there are men that rape little girls,you dumbass twit,there not called “hetero pedophiles” because there sexuality does not matter.The victims age matters.As for your comment about homosexual culture being about having young sex partners LOL i don’t see how you would know unless you were a closet case.Rich herb,you really need counseling because one day your stupidity is going to destroy you and all of your CONSERVATIVE NEANDERTHALS.VOTE DEMOCRAT.DUMBASS.

By: Rich Herb

Rich Herb — Sat, 07 Oct 2006 01:47:45 +0000

just another example of the sick homosexual pedophiles that prey on our teens. the whole homosexual culture is heavily slanted toward younger sex partners. yet no one in the media will ever refer to him as this. Rosie Odonnell on the view, ripped him apart, but not one mention that he’s a homo!

By: BillyJoeJimBob

BillyJoeJimBob — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:53:57 +0000

My group? You mean this group? I cross political lines, Bubba. I voted for Reagan twice and Bush Sr. Voted Republican in other state and local elections as well. Vote Republican all of the time? No. Do I have anything against conservatives? No. I admit to being progressive on *some* issues, and fiscally conservative on *most*. I’ve tried to keep this from being about the Democrats but, ok, let’s play along. Let’s imagine it was Hillary Clinton having oral sex in her office with your daughter and that Nancy Pelosi knew about it for 3 years but did nothing. What would you expect Nancy to do then? Yeah, right. I thought so.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Wed, 04 Oct 2006 00:16:06 +0000

Bottom line on the whole “scandal” is that we, the voters, keep sending morally vacuous, inept and greedy jerks to the Capitol to do our business. Why the outrage? If one plays with snakes and expects them to cuddle, the snake will eventually expose itself and become what it is.

Answer? I don’t know, except to say that anyone who has a floating idea of morality is a snake and doesn’t deserve to be elected dogcatcher, let alone U.S. Representative or Senator. Or President.

And as far as “knowing about this” and flushing the responsible parties, BJJB might want to look to his own reprehensible group of traitors and trash-talkers to see who knew about this, and when. Real odd that it came to light when it did, almost like a Nixonian trick.

As for me, I can’t think of a single congressperson I would trust to make a daily deposit from my business, or trust with my grandchildren. Says a lot about Washington ethics, yes? No?

By: Roger Ames

Roger Ames — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:53:57 +0000

Foley chased a page. Clinton had an intern. Better resources available.

Maybe the congressman should run for President and then he could do what he wants, right in the Oval Office. Democrats have already given their approval by saying, “It’s only sex.”

By: BillyJoeJimBob

BillyJoeJimBob — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 18:08:07 +0000

Yes, but the Democrats aren’t the ones consistently making sounds about having moral superiority…. This isn’t about Democrats at all. Basically, the entire Republican leadership that knew about this and did nothing needs to be flushed.

By: Michael Ejercito

Michael Ejercito — Tue, 03 Oct 2006 15:59:02 +0000

You should find out how the Democrats reacted to Garry Studds.