Liberal “Tolerance” In San Francisco

Anti-Abortion BART adsJust as you would expect.

S.F. Chronicle reports: “Bay Area abortion-rights activists say a Roman Catholic group’s advertisements on hundreds of BART trains and in scores of stations — attacking the Supreme Court’s Roe vs. Wade decision and asking “Abortion: Have we gone too far?” — have gone too far in a region known for its progressive politics.”

Many of the ads have been torn down or defaced since the campaign began three weeks ago.

“I think every woman has noticed them,” said Suzanne “Sam” Joi, a member of Code Pink, a social justice and anti-war group. “I couldn’t believe BART would allow something like this. Why are they doing this?

It’s called free speech, Suzy. Where’s your oft-proclaimed tolerance?

The ads began appearing in BART trains and stations the day after Christmas. According to BART spokesman Linton Johnson, 280 of them appear in BART’s rail cars and 48 larger versions are displayed in stations. The Respect Life Ministry of the Oakland Diocese of the Roman Catholic Church paid $43,200 for the ads, scheduled for display through the end of the month.

BART officials say they had little choice but to post the ads, given the free-speech provisions of the First Amendment. The transit district also has a policy of accepting point-of-view advertising and has displayed other political material — including advertising from its employee unions during last year’s contract talks.

“We’re not in the business of censorship and don’t believe a government agency should be in the business of censorship,” Johnson said. “It shouldn’t be up to a government official to determine whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.”

Many public transportation agencies allow political or point-of-view advertising on their systems, including Muni, which is displaying anti-war ads.

Strange. No reports of those ads being defaced or torn down.

Some supporters of abortion rights have called BART to complain about the ads and demand their removal. The political Web site www.indybay.org urged activists to call BART and members of its Board of Directors to register their discontent. As of Thursday, the transit agency had received 29 complaints, Johnson said.

As some readers will recall, IndyBay.org are the same folks that brought us this.

Critics of the ads also seem to be taking matters into their own hands. Hundreds of the ads have been defaced with markers, had stickers placed over them or have been torn down and ripped up, according to Monika Rodman, coordinator of the group that placed the ads.

The defacement has taken to religious epithets, profanity, everything you can think of,” she said. A billboard at the MacArthur station in Oakland was torn to shreds, she said, and mini essays were written on others.

So many of the ads have been destroyed, she said, that a supply of a couple of dozen extras has been exhausted, and the ministry has ordered reinforcements from its printer. The group, which funded the campaign through donations, according to Rodman, is also asking BART’s ad agency, CBS Outdoor (formerly Viacom Outdoor), for extra display time to compensate for the vandalism.

Seems like a reasonable request. Wonder if CBS will oblige, or shrink for fear of retaliation.

The campaign features two ads, each slickly produced and featuring a blurry photograph of a woman against a turquoise background. One ad, headlined “9 months” in large letters, features nine months of a calendar and reads: “Because of Roe vs. Wade, this is the amount of time the Supreme Court says it’s legal to have an abortion.”

The other contains the message: “The Supreme Court says you can choose: after the heart starts beating, after its arms and legs appear, after all organs are present, after the sex is apparent, after it sucks its thumb, after it responds to sounds, after it could survive outside the womb.”

Both ads conclude with the tagline “Abortion: Have we gone too far?” and the name and Web site address (www.secondlookproject.org) for the Second Look Project, an effort sponsored by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which created the campaign and unveiled it on Washington’s Metro subway system a year ago.

“It was clear that these eye-catching graphics and thought-provoking messages could serve as an effective pro-life educational tool in our area, too,” Rodman said. She said she had tested the ads on female employees of local cafes and was emboldened by their positive responses.

Abortion-rights activists are responding differently, calling the ads misleading, manipulative and part of an effort to undermine the pro-choice movement in the Bay Area.

(Read more here)

UPDATE: (1/24)
Michelle Malkin: “Showdown In San Francisco”

2 Responses to “Liberal “Tolerance” In San Francisco”

  1. RightWinged.com Says:

    March for Life Meets March For Death, A Look At The Looniest Of Lefties

    I linked to this in an update to my post about media bias as it pertains to abortion issue terminology, but I decided it deserved it’s own post. I’ll try to keep from rambling here, and just let the pictures…

  2. penis enlargement before after Says:

    Best performance products.

Leave a Reply