Comments on: Liberal Infallibility: The Gospel According to Ann Coulter

By: Francesca

Francesca — Thu, 14 Aug 2008 20:36:21 +0000

It’s funny once you actually hear the context of what Coulter is saying, it is for the most part NOT offensive. And she almost always has a valid point. Or atleast gives the left a taste of their own medicine. Of course the MSM media is the one who deliberately inflames (great way of course to strip people of their more reasonable faculties) and does not provide context.

Sorry to state the obvious. But in the age of dumbed down PCness it has become so unbearable necessary.

By: Aaron

Aaron — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:47:11 +0000

Their reaction to her was the usual, Kerrys comments on her are actually tame compared to those of the far left. They are talking nasty about here, more than usual. Personally I am not a fan of hers because she just fans the flames further, but she did make a good point about liberalism and how it is becoming a religon, in reality liberalism is to niche , progressvism would be a better term.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 15:39:04 +0000

Well, Anonymous Q got a couple of things correct: “…the inadequacies and imbicility of the entire liberal community.” was one of them.

The other was that she wrote the book to make a few bucks. Dang! What a body won’t do in a capitalistic society!

Other than those two things, he was also correct in stating that he had wasted his letters.

By: Anonymous Q

Anonymous Q — Tue, 13 Jun 2006 06:48:20 +0000

You’re deluding yourself if you think she’s courageous for writing this crap. Why do you think she writes about such inflammatory topics and always takes the most extreme and politically incorrect (for liberals anyways) position? Because she’s trying to take your money. The more saps such as yourself she gets to buy her outrageously priced hardback books, the more of that sweet, sweet cash she’ll have to funnel into her Olympic-sized swimming pool for relaxing dips in the middle of those hot summer days.

For another example, look at Dan Brown, author of The Da Vinci Code. It’s pretty much been proven that most of the background for his book was based on research made up by two punks in the 1900s, and yet Dan Brown started insisting on the authenticity of his book around the time previews for his movie were hitting the theaters. Why? To generate hype for the film so more people will go see it, which leads to more royalties for him.

Americans as a whole have short attention spans and tend to only hear what they want to hear. So let’s say Ann Coulter decides one day that her mansion just isn’t big enough for her and her husband and lord of the household. How does she go about making some easy money? Well, the liberals are too suspicious and PC for her tastes, so why not the republicans? They’re pretty simple-minded, gullible, and eager to swallow any bull that degrades liberals. The choice is clear. She’s going to fleece the fat cow that is the Republican base, and all she needs to do is write a hate-filled, propaganda-spewing and indignant tirade railing against the inadequacies and imbecility of the entire liberal community. If I were her, I’d say mission accomplished, pat myself on the back, and retire to my newly renovated bayside mansion while chuckling to myself at the gullibility my so-called readers.

Get the picture? Still don’t? Then I’ve wasted enough letters on you.

By: Common Sense Junction

Common Sense Junction — Mon, 12 Jun 2006 22:36:54 +0000

Ann Coulter Is Still Right

No matter how high the liberals stack the bullshit and no matter how timid the Rightwing politically correct become.
Amy Proctor is a courageous blogger. She dares to go where others fear to tread.
I posted on Ann Coulter’s book, â€˜GODLESS; the …