As for guvmint intervention, the credible surveys show most Americans are pro-life, but their voices are drowned by whackos who insist it is the fed’s job to protect abortion. It is, in fact, most certainly up to the individual states but their hands are tied by fed courts. If the issue were put to a vote in the individual states, as would be proper, most (admittedly not all) states would restrict the practice.

Basiically, another case of the fed judiciary making law.

And if one is repulsed by the idea of attending a religious service, there are (tax deductable) ways of financially supporting homes for unwed mothers and NPO adoption agencies, too.

Your argument, typically, is that people just can’t tie their own shoes without government intervention, which is false on its face.

Your saying that every one that is pro life should adopt a child, or shut up.

I appreciate your idealism, but welcome to the real world. Some do and some don’t. Others just try to raise our own responsibly, some are successful, and some aren’t.

If your trying to get this around to the Palins daughter, I’ll tell you right now, people on the pro life side would agree the family has done the morally correct thing, so throw all the mud you want; its not going to stick.

If the baby is not adopted, the people who restricted the the woman’s choice are obligated to take care of the child through financial means. If you are unwilling to pay this social welfare, then all you have are empty demands with no real actions behind your bullshit because you have abandoned what you wanted.

If a woman had a choice, it wouldn’t be your problem.

You getting funner and funner Liem.

How about 3 grandchildren? No probably not I guess, even though I brought their mother up in the faith. Im probably violating something about not having the politically correct number of children, that’s what goes on in Communist China. So thank you for telling and demonstrating where you and your friends who are so enamoured with the great and wonderful government to come are at. ;>)

Thats right Liem, but its only a contradiction to you, because I have a different idea than you do about whats moral and immoral. It is just as immoral for a governemnt to force something not enumerated in its constitution as it is to pass laws allowing an immoral activity to continue virtually unregulated.

The fact is, Liem, that a prez or veep have no say in whether abortion is legal or not. The SCOTUS can reject a state’s anti-abortion bill, but not even the Congress can make abortion legal or not legal.

If Roe v. Wade were overturned by the SCOTUS it would then be up to the individual states to determine what level of abortion would be tolerated (or not) within the confines of each indivual state.

But it’s always good to screed fear, isn’t it?

It’s amazing how common sense gets lost in the shuffle. I don’t know of too many expectant mothers who get their first ultrasound and say to their husband “Honey look at our beautiful little fetus.” They’re 1,000 times more likely to say “Honey look at our beautiful little baby.”

Next time, it’d be nice if you brought your comon sense intact. That’s assuming you have any.

Secondly, do you have adopted children? Do you put your moral high ground into actual practice and take unwanted children into your home and raise into responsible, productive adults? If you do, you made a commendable choice. If you don’t, you also had the freedom to make that choice, but you’re also full of shit.

But no, you’re right, women need to be told what to do.

Life is not always pretty and much as we’d like not all babeys are blond hair blue eyed angels, but each of them no matter how flawed are human beings. I did a community service thing for a couple weeks once with a special ed teacher who had two downs syndromne kids in her class, they don’t drool, or babble or act wierd Liem. Ive yet to meet two more effectionate and genuinely caring kids as those two, they were a pleasure to help, yes I said a PLEASURE!!

Obama says we are our brothers keeper, I guess that only applies to the brothers we choose to allow to be born huh?
What a phoney !!!!!

Snerd

I think the biggest threat in Troopergate is that Palin is quickly loosing her outsider persona and is quickly establishing herself as an (R) with inside the Beltway gravitas.

Firstly she is being investigated by a bipartisan Legislative Committee for Abuse of Power and has claimed she wants to get to the bottom of the the ‘alleged vendetta firing’ of Monegan, much as when Bush claiming wanted to get to the bottom of who leaked classified material on Valerie Plame.

Like “W” who would fire whoever did it, and to follow through he would have had to fire his-own-self, Sarah might have to discipline her-self, too.

Sarah claimed, there was ABSOLUTELY NO PRESSURE OF ANY KIND brought upon Monegan to fire Wooten, but as with Libby, her aide Frank Bailey has been found to have done just that, on a taped conversation.

Sarah has invoked the “plausible deniability” defense, saying, ‘Okay pressure was brought on Monegan to fire Wooten, her ex-brother-in-law who she wanted fired, but she was unaware influence was being applied on Monegan to fire trooper Wooten. Monegan was instead following policy guidelines and refusing illegal pressure .

Like Rove and Myers, Sarah’s aid Bailey did not show up for a scheduled interview. One wonders if Sarah will invoke executive privilege and if she will pardon him in the tradition of ‘(R) accountability, if he is held culpable.

Now it appears Monegan has emails from ‘Absolutely-NO-PRESSURE-of-any-kind Sarah, in which she herself brought up Wooten with Monegan. This is not unlike the inside job where “W” knowing all along ‘who done it’, declassified the intel, while still looking to find the leaker of the ‘alleged’ classified data.

Sarah however is in one of them “Cones of Silence”, refusing to do interviews that’ll actually ask questions, not unlike “W”z … ‘We can not comment on an ongoing investigation’ … dodge, stonewalling the very justice they claim to be seeking.

Not only has Sarah demonstrated she can read a teleprompter well, she is fast demonstrating insider (R) executive leadership qualities …

Snerd