Not like the idiots who ruled in favor of Roe v. Wade, overturning nearly 200 years of precedent. Or in Kelo v. New London, overturning not only more than two hundred years of precedent but centuries of English common law before that. Or the one that just happened, last week, with 5 Supreme Idiots overturning not only two centuries of constitutional precedent but rewriting the whole book on the rules of engagement in war. ‘Course, since that was a decision that was favored by the All Communist Lovers Union, stare decisis don’t mean diddly.

The only conclusion I can find for that sorry excuse of a decision is that the French must have been putting something in their drinking water to make those five immune to any sort of common sense at all. It certainly sounded like French “thinking” to me.

If it wasn’t for Judge Hogan, Pelosi and crew would still be posturing with arrogance about this raid on one of their own. In fact, I find it odd that CNN is avoiding this story right now like the plague. You can only imagine the coverage had this be…

Ruling from the bench, Judge Hogan has re-written the Constitution, and trashed over 200 years of precedent. No lawmaker’s office has ever been searched in this fashion. This is the most clear-cut case of judges inmposing their will over the Congressional law-making process, ever.

Now, I’m surprised that this is not your response, CalCon… Seemingly, this would be your argument. Afterall, you have argued judicial activism so many times, you’ve described judges with rulings like these as:

…out-of-control jurists who’d rather serve as superlegislators than as jurists simply untwisting the Constitution. Kelo v. New London is what happens when people start legislating from the bench. Roe v. Wade happened because people codified into law what they couldn’t find in the Constitution. Forcing gay marriage is what happens when jurists write social policy with their rulings. FEC regulation of political free speech is what happens when jurists mandate things that aren’t part of the original legislation. It’s way past time for that nonsense to end.

And changing the way that Congress governs itself is not unlike any of these decisions? How interesting.

So, let’s see: when a judge rules that the Liberals are right, it’s judicial activism; when a judge rules in favor of CONservatives, its a “resounding victory for the Executive Branch.”

I wonder how you’ll feel when its a democrat in the WH, and they start searching replublicon House members’ offices.

Although, I did like the touch of irony in the ruling, saying that barring searches of lawmakers’ offices would turn Capitol Hill into “a taxpayer-subsidized sanctuary for crime.” What, Judge Hogan doesn’t watch the news? At least we know he has a sense of humor!

Because the members of congress did not like that one of their own member’s office has gotten searched LEGALLY, with a WARRANT, they threaten to intefere and mess with the budget of the FBI and Justice Department?!?!?

Are you freakin’ nuts?