Comments on: It’s Official: Obama Isn’t Post-Partisan President

By: T. A. Gray

T. A. Gray — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:31:08 +0000

Right Liem, we all know what an economic power house Russia and China were before they both loosened the reins on private industry. And lets not forget Eastern Europe, and Sean Penn’s dear friends in Cuba. Now thats the way to run a country.

Funny stuff Liem.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 05:01:34 +0000

Just ’cause you didn’t agree with his wars doesn’t mean he wasn’t a jackass, too, Liem. On nearly every domestic issue except taxes he was straight donkey.

And speaking of taxes, when’s the last time you applied for a job from a welfare recipient? Seems to me that if the Thief-in-Chief wants to kickstart the economy he’d find a way to make it profitable for businesses to hire more employees. Kinda sounds like a “tax cut for the rich” to me!

By: Liem

Liem — Wed, 18 Feb 2009 03:27:09 +0000

Yes, Democrats are scared shitless because they have the presidency and both houses of Congress. Little do they know, Republicans are still the ones with real power.

And it’s because they know what’s best for this country. Just look at the last 8 years for proof of how great Republicans are when they run the government.

By: T. A. Gray

T. A. Gray — Tue, 17 Feb 2009 22:05:40 +0000

Dirty little secret Carlos. They are scared shitless, because socialism cant survive without money. Think about it, if no one has money, they cant collect taxes, revenues go down, they cant buy their way into our lives, the dragon that is big governemnt starves and finally dies a horrible death. Society goes back to survival of the fittest and capitalism revives itself, like it always has.

Thys why we havent got time to debate, eveything is now, now, now! They cretaed this goddam mess and they want us spend them out of it.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 23:14:16 +0000

It has occurred to me that maybe I should back off on our current Thief-in-Chief. Our last one, a pretend Republican, over a period of 8 years, spent more than the current one is about to approve by signature, and our grandchildren’s grandchildren will be paying for that, too.

And every supposed Republican over that period of time that stuck pork into any of the bills, then voted for any of them, is just as guilty of thievery as the sitting Thief-in-Chief of the theft of birthright.

By: T. A. Gray

T. A. Gray — Mon, 16 Feb 2009 02:52:04 +0000

Oh I see! NOW we need bi-partisanship.

Take a flying leap, Liem.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:35:17 +0000

Italian for dinner? Wow, I didn’t know that was Newspeak for barnyard dung on the people! I shoulda guessed, though, it’s typical donk/ lib language revisionism.

By: Liem

Liem — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 18:58:01 +0000

I never understood why Obama tried being partisan with this stimulus package. It’s like he wanted to go for Italian for dinner and Republicans wanted a shit sandwich. There really isn’t room for a good compromise.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:45:24 +0000

Partisan? Gosh, ya think?

Without being partisan the Thief-in-Chief won’t be able to bootjack anyone.

By: USN Ret.

USN Ret. — Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:33:46 +0000

One wonders long it will be before he goes down to Venezuela to hug and kiss Comrad Ugo.