Gay Activists Call For All “Out” Attack
Just when you thought the Robert Traynham story couldn’t get nastier…
As reported a few days ago, angry homosexual activists “outed” Mr. Traynham, notably because he serves as the Director of Communications for Sen. Rick Santorum, a high-profile Republican and outspoken critic of gay marriages.
Attempts to pressure Mr. Traynham during an interview resulted in feedback the activists don’t like to hear: He “strongly supports” the Senator and considers him to be “a man of principle, he is a man who sticks up for what he believes in…”
That kind of free thinking will not be tolerated by the homosexual militia. Besides the offense of trying to make someone’s sexuality an issue to exploit their own political gain, they are going further. This time, even more shameless.
Today, “gay terrorist” Michael Rogers has posted this vulgar graphic on his blog:
The same post also includes a call to arms, an outright attack against Mr. Traynham. It reads:
“Take ACTION: Tell Robert Traynham and his colleagues what you think of him being an openly gay man (and I’m not talking about the celibate kind, either) and working for one of the most homophobic Senators, Rick Santorum.
Click here to open an email to Senator Santorum’s office (a copy will be sent to blogACTIVE and to the public e-mail address Mr. Traynham lists on this site.”
Finally, Mr. Rogers pushes one nasty step further: Encouraging his readers to harass Mr. Traynham by telephone.
“Now, I’m, not the type to publish home phone numbers on blogACTIVE.com, and I’m not going to start now. I do find it interesting, however, to see that Robert has his number on the web if you want to give him a buzz…Here’s the 411.”
Just goes to show how low they’ll stoop and dirty they’ll get to attack anyone who disagrees. This isn’t about honest debate, it’s about forcing an agenda.
What would happen if someone did the same to some Democratic staffer? Or how about producing a similar insult to another sitting U.S. Senator?
Where’s the outrage here? Where’s Ted Kennedy? Why aren’t Democrats speaking “out” against this trash?
For all the usual liberal whining, this is “politics of personal destruction” at its worst.
And where’s any media coverage?
(Too busy with Rove, of course)
RELATED:
Gay Confessions: Kennedy vs. Santorum
Santorum Staffer Outing Controversy
Democrats Out Another Gay Guy
July 19th, 2005 at 5:37 pm
Just how ‘homophobic’ can Santorum be if he hired an openly gay man for such an important position on his staff?
July 20th, 2005 at 2:31 am
Breakfast: 7/20/2005
Try one of these specials with your breakfast: phin doesn’t waste time, buy you can. moehawk (oystersnout) reaches the five-week mark. Beth (MVRWC) isn’t letting her writer’s block affect her reading. NIF: News, Intersting, Funny has … well … newsy
July 21st, 2005 at 12:33 pm
There is not great media coverage because there isnot great surprise. This kind of despicable behavior has become so common that it is viewed as near acceptble by the MSM. When Santorum wrote about the environment of the Boston area leading to the type of acceptance that creates extreme behavior, he was correct. The best example of this is in the liberal response to his statements and actions.
He is called a conservative homophobe, yet he has an assistant who is both black and gay (although his assistant never intended that to be public). Clearly he is not a homophobe, therefore they must attack the assistant for being a “traitor homosexual.” According to liberal thinking homosexuals cannot be conservative and if they are then they are somehow not “true” homosexuals, whatever that means. The idiocy of their arguments becomes more strained by the moment.
There are those on both sides of the aisle who have much to be ashamed of. The ultra conservatives who do use hate to present a message that need not be clothed that way and the liberals who also use hate to attack those who they say represent hateful policy are two sides of the same coin. What cannot be established with intellectual honesty and logic must be established by any means possible.
For the fact that ou4 country has come to this we should all be ashamed.
September 7th, 2005 at 8:24 pm
[...] of the bill. (c) The only reason this matter is still an issue is because special interests are driving it. On February 19, 2004, the city of San Francisco filed a lawsuit [...]
October 5th, 2006 at 7:53 am
[...] And, evidently, it’s okay to do so. There’s no uproar from the usually outraged homosexual activists in Hollywood or elsewhere. There’s no indignant posturing from Jesse and his Rainbow Coalition. The ACLU isn’t clamoring, despite it’s NAMBLA clientele. San Francisco’s very own Feinstein, Boxer and Pelosi aren’t worried about the gay bash. Why’s that? Because Foley is a Republican, and it’s time to play politics. As Richard Simmons would say, “Get with the program, people.” [...]
October 11th, 2006 at 7:02 am
[...] RELATED: Santorum Sounds Statesmanlike, Casey Evasive Gay Activists Call For All “Out” Attack (what is is about German shephards?) These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]