Conservative Wins France’s Presidential Election: Cars burnt, police hurt
Wonder what’s worse: Do they dislike Sarkozy for being conservative or for being pro-America?
Reuters reports: “Hundreds of people were arrested in France overnight in clashes between police and protesters angry over conservative Nicolas Sarkozy’s victory in Sunday’s presidential election, police said.”
Just like many American liberals, the notion of democratic elections is only embraced, evidently, when the votes go their way. If not, then they take to the streets in protest.
In France, that’s what happens when you cut off the socialist, goverment-sponsored gravy-train for the unambitious, paid for by taxpayers. We know the story.
But even in gay Paris (pah-reee), it appears that the voters have spoken: they want law & order even more than noblesse oblige. Maybe, they too, are looking for a cowboy to clean up the streets — because limp-wristed political correctness ain’t gonna do it.
Can’t sip champagne and smoke dainty little cigarettes if Muslims are rioting around you.
Official figures released early on Monday said demonstrators set fire to 367 cars and injured 28 policemen across France, and 270 people were arrested in the violent protests against the tough-talking former interior minister.
Sarkozy made his name as a law-and-order hardliner who also tightened France’s immigration laws, making him a hate figure for the left. Slogans spray-painted on the streets of Paris overnight included “Sarkozy fascist.”
He is also a controversial figure in France’s poor and multi-ethnic suburbs, where nationwide riots erupted in 2005.
At the time Sarkozy branded the troublemakers as scum.
If the shoe fits…
Since many whites are casually referred to (mostly by the Hollywood-set) as “trash” for no greater offense than simply being poor, uneducated and living in trailer parks, it’s hard to argue with calling people “scum” who resort to violence and chaos by setting cars on fire, committing burglary, assualt and murder, and other violent actions within a country.
Reports and eyewitness accounts suggested the violence was worse than the official statistics indicated because they did not include other incidents such as petrol bomb attacks on buses near Paris or smashed up shop fronts in large cities.
The national tally was also at odds with local figures. Paris officials said 33 police were injured in the capital alone.
. . .Youths went on the rampage in adjoining streets, smashing phone cabins and shop windows.
“Everyone got hit,” said Sophie Wolkowitch, whose pharmacy suffered 14,000 euros ($19,000) of damage.
Similar attacks were reported in the southeastern city of Lyon and the southern city of Toulouse. Bus shelters were smashed in the northern city of Lille and a school was set on fire in the Paris suburb of Evry.
In the northern department clustered around Lille, about 100 cars were torched, the fire brigade said.
. . .
Cars and shop windows were also damaged in Nantes while to the northwest, in Caen, four police were hurt and an attempt was made to set fire to the local office of Sarkozy’s UMP party.
In other news, Johnny Depp and Sean Penn were nowhere to be found. They must both be taking this very hard.
RELATED:
Illegal Immigration: What Did France Discover
That the GOP Can’t Grasp?
French Parliament Makes US Senate
Look Weak on Immigration Reform
Chirac: France Must Learn Hard Lessons
May 7th, 2007 at 5:32 pm
U.S. Hails Sarkozy’s Election in France…
The Bush administration on Monday welcomed the election of French President-elect Nicolas Sarkozy, a…
May 8th, 2007 at 7:23 am
Why, glory be! All those rioters were just common citizens voicing and acting out displeasure, I guess.
The closest this blurb came to naming any group was when it indicated the rioters were mostly from “multi-ethnic neighborhoods.”
Newspeak for the “religion of peace.”
The West is going to bury itself with idiotic correctness.
May 8th, 2007 at 11:47 am
Political correctness has turned from being a diplomatic euphamism to cowardess to Orwell’s truthspeak.
May 9th, 2007 at 10:42 am
This is outrageous! If the French move any further to the right they’ll risk missing out on the wonders of advanced multiculturalism we’re experiencing here in the U.S. For example,
more affirmative action discrimination
more no whites allowed race based private scholarships
more race quotas in private hiring
more race norming of employment tests
more separate pool executive hiring
more minority layoff protection
more sensitivity training
more minority promotion networks
more no whites allowed contract set-asides
more minority-only tax breaks
And ever more racist discrimination extracted off the backs of white children for the crime of being white.
Why don’t the French understand that increasing anti-white discrimination is good? Ignorance. That’s why. Raw, naked ignorance. They need to be educated and taught the three racial theories that we use to promote, justify and legitimise anti-white racial discrimination. This is the only way to cure ignorance.
Can any comrade please translate the racial theories to French so we can start educating them? Here they are:
1. The Unique History of White Evil theory
2. The Unearned White Skin-color Privilege theory
3. The White Majority Deference theory
The Unique History of White Evil Theory
This racial theory holds that “whites cannot evade history”. It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against a group based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual participation or consent (in slavery, holocaust, etc.) and therefore denies innocence as a defense.
The Unearned White Skin-color Privilege Theory
This racial theory holds that “whites are privileged”. It is a racial theory because it justifies discrimination against individuals based on their (Euro-Christian) ancestry alone irrespective of actual status or financial condition and therefore denies innocence as a defense.
The White Majority Deference Theory
This racial theory holds that “majorities must serve minorities unless the minority is white”. It is a racial theory because its discriminatory logic applies exclusively to whites. For example, suggesting the reverse, that white minorities in South Africa or Detroit should have not equal but superior rights is widely considered insane.
Only when the french have been educated to believe in the racial theories will they understand why it’s important for whites to become minorities. Right now they fear becoming minorities because they expect the pro-minority racial extortion coaltion to maximize the racial discrimination against them. It is therefore imperative to convince them that their children not only deserve racism but that they should welcome it!
—-
Bob’s Riddle: All anti-white racists agree that it’s ok for whites to become minorities in their own countries. All anti-white racists also agree that a Japanese person who wants to become a minority in his own country is either a traitor or clinically insane. Therefore, what is an anti-white racist? Answer