<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Congress 2006: Democrats Lead by Nine Points</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/congress-2006-democrats-lead-by-nine-points/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/congress-2006-democrats-lead-by-nine-points/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 01:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Fred Fry</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/congress-2006-democrats-lead-by-nine-points/comment-page-1/#comment-35017</link>
		<dc:creator>Fred Fry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 15 Oct 2005 02:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1181#comment-35017</guid>
		<description>We have the 2000, 2002 and the 2004 elections where the pollsters were dead wrong.  Each time they did a self evaluation in that:

People voting for Republicans didn't answer the survey and;

Pollsters oversampled Democrats.

And yet these skewed polls keep coming giving the opposition false hope and contributing to BDS.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have the 2000, 2002 and the 2004 elections where the pollsters were dead wrong.  Each time they did a self evaluation in that:</p>
<p>People voting for Republicans didn&#8217;t answer the survey and;</p>
<p>Pollsters oversampled Democrats.</p>
<p>And yet these skewed polls keep coming giving the opposition false hope and contributing to BDS.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/congress-2006-democrats-lead-by-nine-points/comment-page-1/#comment-34999</link>
		<dc:creator>Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 22:30:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1181#comment-34999</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Rove Testifies Again in CIA Leak Probe&lt;/strong&gt;

Karl Rove Makes 4th Grand Jury Appearance in Investigation About Leaked Identity of CIA Officer</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Rove Testifies Again in CIA Leak Probe</strong></p>
<p>Karl Rove Makes 4th Grand Jury Appearance in Investigation About Leaked Identity of CIA Officer</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/congress-2006-democrats-lead-by-nine-points/comment-page-1/#comment-34994</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:39:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1181#comment-34994</guid>
		<description>The odds are always against #3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The odds are always against #3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gmg425</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/congress-2006-democrats-lead-by-nine-points/comment-page-1/#comment-34993</link>
		<dc:creator>gmg425</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Oct 2005 21:37:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=1181#comment-34993</guid>
		<description>Those poll numbers are totally useless on several levels.

1) They don't take into account which districts President Bush won and by how much.

2) They don't take into account which seats are open seats. Those are about the only seats that are potential toss-ups these days due to the safe districting that's happening these days.

3) This polling assumes that a competent Democrat with a coherent message is running in enough seats to win. What's the odds of that being reality?

It's been my experience that demographics, incumbents and personal scandals play a biger role in determining who wins and loses than does a generic poll.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those poll numbers are totally useless on several levels.</p>
<p>1) They don&#8217;t take into account which districts President Bush won and by how much.</p>
<p>2) They don&#8217;t take into account which seats are open seats. Those are about the only seats that are potential toss-ups these days due to the safe districting that&#8217;s happening these days.</p>
<p>3) This polling assumes that a competent Democrat with a coherent message is running in enough seats to win. What&#8217;s the odds of that being reality?</p>
<p>It&#8217;s been my experience that demographics, incumbents and personal scandals play a biger role in determining who wins and loses than does a generic poll.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

