Comments on: Censorship Alert http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/ Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM) Sat, 26 May 2012 01:03:47 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7 hourly 1 By: Carlos http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-1272618 Carlos Wed, 09 Jul 2008 02:15:52 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/#comment-1272618 Oregon's legislature meets every two years. The only ones who want it to meet every year are those who feed at the trough (bureaucrats, lobbyists, welfarers, etc.). Although they try desparately to get two years damage into one, they generally fail. Makes me feel better knowing that. Oregon’s legislature meets every two years. The only ones who want it to meet every year are those who feed at the trough (bureaucrats, lobbyists, welfarers, etc.). Although they try desparately to get two years damage into one, they generally fail.

Makes me feel better knowing that.

]]> By: T.A Gray http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-1272042 T.A Gray Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:28:43 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/#comment-1272042 And wouldn't it also be nice to have a time limit on when they get their work done, better yet pay them say 6 months a year and a train ticket home. After all Amtrak is their baby, let them all use it, not just the ones along the NE Corrider main. I feel much safer when Congress is not in Washington. And wouldn’t it also be nice to have a time limit on when they get their work done, better yet pay them say 6 months a year and a train ticket home. After all Amtrak is their baby, let them all use it, not just the ones along the NE Corrider main.

I feel much safer when Congress is not in Washington.

]]> By: Carlos http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/comment-page-1/#comment-1271985 Carlos Tue, 08 Jul 2008 21:10:36 +0000 http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/censorship-alert/#comment-1271985 Frankly, Gary, wouldn't it be great if the congresscritters were censored? Completely! I mean, not even a peep out of them. Think of all the damage that wouldn't occur simply because they couldn't even talk, let alone blather. Unless it was on or in a media source available to the public, where anyone could post or say his 2 cents worth. And wouldn't it be nice if all conversations with your congressman had to be recorded and published? I mean, even the one with the farmer and his wife or, more importantly, the one with the ethanol lobbyist or the NEA lobbyists? Think of all the things that might not be said as opposed to what we don't know is being said today. In other words, if they're going to censor, they'd better also make all the dealings available to the public. After all, it's my dime and yours that's paying for their time while they're listening to the lobbyists, and I think that qualifies me to know what's being said, offered, bribed or threatened. Frankly, Gary, wouldn’t it be great if the congresscritters were censored? Completely! I mean, not even a peep out of them. Think of all the damage that wouldn’t occur simply because they couldn’t even talk, let alone blather.

Unless it was on or in a media source available to the public, where anyone could post or say his 2 cents worth.

And wouldn’t it be nice if all conversations with your congressman had to be recorded and published? I mean, even the one with the farmer and his wife or, more importantly, the one with the ethanol lobbyist or the NEA lobbyists? Think of all the things that might not be said as opposed to what we don’t know is being said today.

In other words, if they’re going to censor, they’d better also make all the dealings available to the public. After all, it’s my dime and yours that’s paying for their time while they’re listening to the lobbyists, and I think that qualifies me to know what’s being said, offered, bribed or threatened.

]]>