No Democrat of any relevance would call for Israel’s destruction. No Democrat of any relevance “eschewed” the military effort in Afghanistan. And who are these “internationalists” who label the UN “mankind’s savior”?- Pan

Saddam Hussein used to pay a bounty to the families of Palestinians who suicide bombed in Israel, so I guess as long as they destroy Israel a little piece at a time you are OK with it.

The Democrats you speak of have no compunction interfering with the war in Iraq at any turn they can, in any way they can, as long as getting George Bush is somewhere in the equation, despite Sadaam’s efforts at undermining Israel, and supporting the terrorists who would do so.

There appears to be actually only one Democrat of relevance in the entire bunch, which you claim represents half the country, and that is Senator Joe Leiberman.

No Democrat of any relevance would call for Israel’s destruction. No Democrat of any relevance “eschewed” the military effort in Afghanistan. And who are these “internationalists” who label the UN “mankind’s savior”?

I have an exercise for you. Next time write a post accusing half of your fellow citizens of treasonous behavior, try citing and linking in order to support your claims. It’s more difficult than making stuff up, sure, and less satisfying than winning a debate (even if your opponent is a figment of your imagination), but I think you will find it more rewarding than making irresponsible and unfounded accusations at some undefined “left” which doesn’t exist. Even more rewarding (and useful) might be to find liberals’ actual objections to Bush policies and calmly and rationally assess them. Until you do that, stop making shit up.