Search This Site

Please Visit Our Sponsors:

Recent Posts

» Team Franken’s Despicable Tactics
» Franken: Election Workers Broke Election Law
» State Canvassing Board Rejects Franken’s 11th Hour Bid
» Now That the Election’s Over…
» Lies And the Lying SOB’s That Peddle This BS
» Refreshing Talk From Miami
» It ISN’T The Funding, Stupid
» 250 Lawyers For Team Franken?
» Franken’s Undervote Strategy
» Vague and Generic Reaganism?
» Cluelessness Personified
» The Floor, Not The Ceiling?
» Ballot Box Troubles: A Matter of Incompetence or Dishonesty?
» Coleman-Franken 08 = Rossi-Gregoire 2004?
» Gay Activist Opposes Church Protests
» Forward-Looking Campaigning
» Interesting Reading
» GREAT NEWS!!!
» The Candidacy About Nothing
» I Have a Theory On the Palin-Bashing

List all posts »

Promote

Add to your Favorites

Set Font Size

Default font size    Large font size    Massive font size

Translations

Support C.C.

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Blogstuff

SpamPoison

eXTReMe Tracker
TTLB code goes here

Get your Google PageRank

Blogroll


link = recently updated

Blogroll This Site

Conservatisms

"I have a dream that my four children will one day live in a nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin but by the content of their character."
-- Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr.

Capitalism



Read Us via Email!

Enter your email address:

Powered by FeedBurner

Syndication

Just click on the button to be taken to a page where you can sign up with almost every feedreader imaginable!



This site is best viewed with:

Spread The Word

Nancy Pelosi - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Dianne Feinstein - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Barbara Boxer - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Please, download this button to your site.
Please, download this button to your site.


Stuff

GET SOME GEAR at the Califonia Conservative Store!
EXPAND YOUR MIND at the California Conservative Bookstore!



News & Opinions

TownHall Latest columns:  John Hawkins: In Defense of "The Oogedy-Boogedy Branch of the GOP"
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Rachel Marsden: Obama Upsets French, Arabs
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Lorie Byrd: The Only Way for Republicans to Win
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Suzanne Fields: Lessons From the Vampire
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Michael Gerson: Iraq's Costly Success
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Patrick J. Buchanan: Who Killed Detroit?
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Brent Bozell III: Hollywood's Ridiculous Lawyers
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  David Limbaugh: Evangelicals - A Drag on or Essential to the GOP?
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Kathleen Parker: The Word for Freedom
Posted 115 minutes ago

TownHall Latest columns:  Michelle Malkin: The eHarmony Shakedown
Posted 115 minutes ago


Links of Interest

Article Link 1 by Random Author
Interview 1 by Random Author
National Review Online
The Drudge Report If you don’t know what this site is, get off the Internet.
VDARE.COM The Truth Behind U.S. Immigration


CA Special Election: Sad Results Indeed

The election is over and the ‘Ney’s’ have it. 200 million dollars, fear-mongering and pandering, the sad and victimized faces of California school teachers in TV ads, characterizations of Gov. Schwarzenegger as a dictator, disingenuous pleas to protect the safety of our daughters, and a public too apathetic to vote culminated in a rejection of all 8 state-wide proposition measures in Tuesday’s special election. Here are the finalized election results:

CA_2005Election_resultsClick on graphic for more details

It seems like among the electorate who actually did vote, they mostly followed the anti-Schwarzenegger rhetoric that dominated the tone of those opposed to the propositions supported by the Governor and voted No on all the measures. Arnold Steinberg from The National Review elaborated on this strategy of ‘no’:

The “no” syndrome in this special election had several components. There was the “no” on Schwarzenegger (targeted against his four measures). There also was the “no” on the special election itself, which mainly hurt his ballot propositions — perhaps all eight ballot propositions. Republicans hoped those angry people would simply stay at home, but plenty turned out, not just to vote “no” on his four reform propositions, but on all eight. I agree, though, with Republican strategists that many of those angry at the special did stay home; otherwise, the results Tuesday night would have been worse. Still another “no” syndrome would be television-ad fatigue. The media buys were overkill. Even casual TV viewers like myself saw every single spot many dozens of times. Who knows what befell a more regular viewer? One way to rebel was to stay away. Another way was to vote “no” on everything.

What is most frustrating to me is the apathy from the electorate. Constitutional budget changes and redistricting are not sexy and exciting election topics but Proposition 73, the parental notification for abortions initiative, has moral and passionate appeal but was defeated (narrowly) as well. Estimates are that only 30% of registered voters actually voted. If you consider that many citizens are not even registered and factor out the illegals, the number of actual voters that voted was very, very small.

How did Propositions 73 not pass? How did this initiative alone not muster the passion of conservatives and those religiously minded? Where were the voices of churches backing this proposition? Where was the pro-life get-out-the-vote drives? Polls consistently show that a majority of people, even in California, support parental notification for abortion. Why the apathy when given a chance to make your voice be heard?

I know that many people assuage their guilt of not voting by the fact that since none of the propositions failed by one vote, they are not personally responsible for them failing. I disagree. If you failed to vote (and assuming that you actually support the propositions), you do, in fact, share in their failure. I personally know that 7 of my friends did not vote and, if they would have, they would have voted for Prop 73, as well as many of the other initiatives on the ballot.

I am one person with a small group of friends and it seems that many of them did not vote. This story, I’m sure, has been repeated all over the state: people with good intentions wanting change in the state but no finish when it comes to actually casting a vote.

In a state of 36 million people, only 3,130,062 could muster the strength to cast a vote restoring the rights of parents over their children regarding abortion. How very sad indeed.

RELATED:
“Judgment Day”: Coverage of
California’s Special Election

Cross-posted at MCCANNTA

The Mad Tea Party linked with Californians Say No But Not With Conviction
Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator linked with Democrats retain two key governorships
Donkey Stomp linked with Elections Make Dems Over Confident
mccannta linked with CA Special Election: Sad Results Indeed

TrackBack URI for this post:
http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/ca-special-election-sad-results-indeed/trackback/

Trackbacks & Pingbacks

  1. [...] So… California’s Special Election (only “special” in the sense that people didn’t go vote) is just a SAD reality of this State. I would have loved to vote, but I cannot. I’m not a citizen of this fine country nor a resident of this not so fine state. But, I mean, come on! Granted, Hugh Hewitt says the Governator’s approach to the whole thing was dumb, but aren’t there enough decent folks in this (not so) great state to vote “Yes” on Prop. 73? California Conservative says: In a state of 36 million people, only 3,130,062 could muster the strength to cast a vote restoring the rights of parents over their children regarding abortion. How very sad indeed. [...]

    Pingback by A Sycamore Tree » Who voted? — November 9, 2005 @ 6:57 pm

  2. CA Special Election: Sad Results Indeed

    The election is over and the ‘Ney’s’ have it. 200 million dollars, fear-mongering and pandering, the sad and victimized faces of California school teachers in TV ads, characterizations of Gov. Schwarzenegger as a dictator, disingenous pleas to prote…

    Trackback by mccannta — November 9, 2005 @ 7:20 pm

  3. Elections Make Dems Over Confident

    Dems are rejoicing today after what they see a successful election that proves the Republican Party is out of touch with America. The gubernatorial races in Virginia and New Jersey are perfect examples of how Republicans are losing ground. However,…

    Trackback by Donkey Stomp — November 9, 2005 @ 7:21 pm

  4. Democrats retain two key governorships

    Democrats kept their grip on the governorships of Virginia and New Jersey in Tuesday’s elections, wh

    Trackback by Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator — November 10, 2005 @ 4:05 am

  5. [...] linked at California Conservative. Permalink  [...]

    Pingback by Choose Life » Opportunity Missed — November 10, 2005 @ 7:54 am

  6. Californians Say No But Not With Conviction

    The headline in the front section of today’s San Francisco Chronicle reads “CALIFORNIANS SAY NO TO SCHWARZENEGGER”. No doubt, the headline would be shorter if Arnold’s last name were Schmidt.

    But I digress.

    Trackback by The Mad Tea Party — November 10, 2005 @ 1:05 pm

  7. [...] RELATED: Gov. Schwarzenegger: “I Take Full Responsibility” CA Special Election: Sad Results Indeed These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages. [...]

    Pingback by California Conservative » Gov. Schwarzenegger: Post-Election Trauma? — November 8, 2006 @ 12:57 pm


Comments

RSS feed for comments on this post.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>