<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ACLU Seeks Again to Block Wiretaps</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/aclu-seeks-again-to-block-wiretaps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/aclu-seeks-again-to-block-wiretaps/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 23:03:26 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: wiretapping</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/aclu-seeks-again-to-block-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-281721</link>
		<dc:creator>wiretapping</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 09:31:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/aclu-seeks-again-to-block-wiretaps/#comment-281721</guid>
		<description>Get we get a wire tap on them now to see what they are planning?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get we get a wire tap on them now to see what they are planning?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/aclu-seeks-again-to-block-wiretaps/comment-page-1/#comment-281646</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Nov 2006 03:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/liberals/aclu-seeks-again-to-block-wiretaps/#comment-281646</guid>
		<description>Well, according to the ACLU, maybe.  I don't think so personally, but what does a country boy like me know?

Bottom line on it all, though, has to be, are the "wiretaps" (hardly accurate, but I'll go with the flow) CONSTITUTIONAL?  The ACLU has undoubtedly shopped around for a moonbat judge that can find new stuff that 200 years+ of judges couldn't, but hopefully a court somewhere along the line will have enough education to read what the Constitution says, know what they are reading, and throw the suit out with prejudice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, according to the ACLU, maybe.  I don&#8217;t think so personally, but what does a country boy like me know?</p>
<p>Bottom line on it all, though, has to be, are the &#8220;wiretaps&#8221; (hardly accurate, but I&#8217;ll go with the flow) CONSTITUTIONAL?  The ACLU has undoubtedly shopped around for a moonbat judge that can find new stuff that 200 years+ of judges couldn&#8217;t, but hopefully a court somewhere along the line will have enough education to read what the Constitution says, know what they are reading, and throw the suit out with prejudice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

