ACLU: If It Makes Sense, They’re Against It

ABCNews reports: “Security screeners at 40 major airports across the country will be trained next year to use casual conversation to flush out possible terrorists.
. . .

The American Civil Liberties Union has warned that the screening technique could result in racial profiling.”
(Hat tip: StopTheACLU)

Michelle Malkin weighs in:

If the ACLU has its way, the interrogation methods used by Diana Dean–the Customs Agent whose questioning of a nervous and sweating young, brown-skinned male trying to cross the Washington state-Canada border unraveled al Qaeda’s LAX Millenium plot and saved untold innocent lives–would be banned nationwide.

If the ACLU has its way, we’d have no profiling of any kind.

And no border security.

No immigration enforcement.

No information-sharing.

No counterterrorism surveillance.

The ACLU response to terrorism is: Do Nothing. Who needs enemies?

Indeed.

And we’ve got much more on the ACLU and Homeland Security. Click and scroll.

One Response to “ACLU: If It Makes Sense, They’re Against It”

  1. Unpartisan.com Political News and Blog Aggregator Says:

    Airport security uses talk as tactic

    The Transportation Security Administration plans to train screeners at 40 major airports next year t

Leave a Reply