California Conservative

It’s pretty obvious that the Democrats/ACORN are pulling out all the stops in their drive to re-elect Gov. Corzine. This isn’t the first information that ElectionJournal.com has gotten on voters showing up at their precincts to vote, only to have the election judges tell them that they’ve already cast absentee ballots. Here’s EJ’s post:

Throughout the morning, EJ has received tips regarding voters who have shown up to the polls today, to find that someone has already cast their ballot through the absentee process.

Meet Mark Allen, a voter from Atlantic, who showed up at the poll this morning to cast a ballot, only to find out someone already has requested and sent in an absentee ballot in his name.

As reported earlier, Democrats have requested the Secretary of State “to instruct County Clerks not to deny (vote by mail) applications on the basis of signature comparison alone.”

If Democrats have their wishes granted, there may be actual disenfranchisement; those provisional ballots cast by the real voters will be discarded in favor of forged absentee ballots.

The law in Minnesota should be the national benchmark. No, I’m not suggesting that a federal law be passed making it the law of the land. Rather, I’m suggesting that each state read Minnesota’s laws, then each state pass legislation mirroring Minnesota’s election laws.

In Minnesota, absentee ballots aren’t counted until after the polls close on Election Day. The absentee ballots are cross-checked against whether the voter voted on Election Day. If a person votes on Election Day and has filled out an absentee ballot, the Election Day vote is the vote that’s counted.

If Mr. Allen’s testimony is allowed and the judge finds his testimony credible, the Democrats’ attorneys will have some explaining to do:

Citing concerns people would be disenfranchised, Democratic Party lawyer Paul Josephson wrote New Jersey’s secretary of state asking her “to instruct County Clerks not to deny (vote by mail) applications on the basis of signature comparison alone.” He wrote that county clerks “may be overworked and are likely not trained in handwriting analysis,” in asking that voters with suspect applications be given provisional ballots.

I suspect that Mr. Josephson’s application might get rejected if the judge takes judicial note of Mr. Allen’s testimony. To do otherwise would mean that the judge is knowingly ruling in favor of voter fraud.

Technorati Tags: Elections, Voter Fraud, Disenfranchised Voters, Judiciary, Testimony, New Jersey, Absentee Ballots, ACORN

Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog

This entry was posted on Tuesday, November 3rd, 2009 at 2:03 pm and is filed under Author: Gary Gross, Corruption, Democrats, Elections, Judiciary, Voter Fraud. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can skip to the end and leave a response. Pinging is currently not allowed.