<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SCOTUS: Voter ID Legislation Constitutional</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/judiciary/scotus-voter-id-legislation-constitution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/judiciary/scotus-voter-id-legislation-constitution/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 21:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Ejercito</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/judiciary/scotus-voter-id-legislation-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-1090715</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Ejercito</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 15:42:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/judiciary/scotus-voter-id-legislation-constitution/#comment-1090715</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Democrats had attacked the law, saying it created a burden for poor, minority, and handicapped voters, who would have a harder time getting government-issued IDs. They accused Indiana officials of passing the law to suppress the minority vote.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
What they &lt;i&gt; really &lt;/i&gt; mean is that it created a burden for those who want to get away with voter fraud.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Democrats had attacked the law, saying it created a burden for poor, minority, and handicapped voters, who would have a harder time getting government-issued IDs. They accused Indiana officials of passing the law to suppress the minority vote.</p></blockquote>
<p>What they <i> really </i> mean is that it created a burden for those who want to get away with voter fraud.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: george</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/judiciary/scotus-voter-id-legislation-constitution/comment-page-1/#comment-1088944</link>
		<dc:creator>george</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 22:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/judiciary/scotus-voter-id-legislation-constitution/#comment-1088944</guid>
		<description>They did something that makes sense? Maybe we have chance on the 2nd Amnt ruling coming up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They did something that makes sense? Maybe we have chance on the 2nd Amnt ruling coming up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

