Search This Site

Please Visit Our Sponsors:

Recent Posts

» Is This Why Democrats Boycotted FNC Debates?
» I Told You So
» Cowards Turn Tail
» Rebuilding From the State Up
» Popularity is Fleeting, Principles are Forever
» A Significant And Growing Problem
» Obama’s Racial Problems
» Blue Dog Democrats are Moderates?
» Obama Exposed
» When Politicians Don’t Learn Economic Principles
» Painting An Unflattering Portrait
» The Problem With Republicans (And How To Fix Them)
» McCain Tightens Noose on Obama’s Hamas Policy
» Irony of Ironies
» Rewording the Obama Campaign Slogan
» Mai Thor: Voting Fraud Is a Racist Illusion
» Hillary Isn’t Going Quietly (And She Shouldn’t)
» Michelle Obama Earns Sourpuss of the Campaign Award
» Don’t Send a Messiah to do a Man’s Job
» Democrats on Energy: Grab Your Wallets

List all posts »

Promote

Add to your Favorites

Set Font Size

Default font size    Large font size    Massive font size

Translations

Support C.C.

Amazon Honor System Click Here to Pay Learn More

Blogstuff

SpamPoison

eXTReMe Tracker
TTLB code goes here

Get your Google PageRank

Blogroll


link = recently updated

Blogroll This Site

Conservatisms

"How do you tell a communist? Well, it's someone who reads Marx and Lenin. And how do you tell an anti-Communist? It's someone who understands Marx and Lenin."
-- Ronald Reagan

Capitalism



Read Us via Email!

Enter your email address:

Powered by FeedBurner

Syndication

Just click on the button to be taken to a page where you can sign up with almost every feedreader imaginable!



This site is best viewed with:

Spread The Word

Nancy Pelosi - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Dianne Feinstein - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Barbara Boxer - Does Not Speak For Everyone
Please, download this button to your site.
Please, download this button to your site.


Stuff

GET SOME GEAR at the Califonia Conservative Store!
EXPAND YOUR MIND at the California Conservative Bookstore!



News & Opinions

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  17-year-old boy shot in Berkeley
Posted 21 minutes ago

SFGate: Top News Stories:  For Newsom, same-sex marriage ruling is vindication
Posted 48 minutes ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  For Newsom, same-sex marriage ruling is vindication
Posted 48 minutes ago

SFGate: Top News Stories:  Ruling injects hot new issue into presidential race
Posted 52 minutes ago

SFGate: Top News Stories:  After ruling, gay couples get busy planning weddings
Posted 52 minutes ago

SFGate: Top News Stories:  Elated Castro residents celebrate marriage ruling
Posted 52 minutes ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  Elated Castro residents celebrate marriage ruling
Posted 52 minutes ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  Ruling injects hot new issue into presidential race
Posted 52 minutes ago

SFGate: Bay Area News Stories:  After ruling, gay couples get busy planning weddings
Posted 52 minutes ago

SFGate: Top News Stories:  Feinstein, Lofgren use Iraq spending bill to push for guest-worker program
Posted 67 minutes ago


Links of Interest

The Drudge Report
VDARE.COM
National Review Online


Sen. Obama Doesn’t Dare Answer These Questions

George Will has penned another masterpiece, this time asking Sen. Obama a set of rather difficult questions, questions that actually require intellectual heft. Here’s the easiest question in the bunch:

You say, “The insurance companies, the drug companies, they’re not going to give up their profits easily when it comes to health care.” Why should they? Who will profit from making those industries unprofitable? When pharmaceutical companies have given up their profits, who will fund pharmaceutical innovations, without which there will be much preventable suffering and death? What other industries should “give up their profits”?

Sen. Obama can’t answer that question because it requires a capitalist answer, something that’d infuriate Sen. Obama’s ardent socialist supporters. This is the only time it’s difficult being a liberal. It’s easy being a liberal if you’re never asked thoughtful questions. It’s immensely difficult when they’re asked why questions. Liberals are used to giving answers to ‘what’ type questions. It’s difficult for liberals to answer ‘why’ questions because that requires logic.

If I’ve learned anything about politicking, it’s that most liberals can’t handle answering why questions because they’re so used to not having to defend their principles and policies. Altogether too often, liberals are asked a what question, which often gets accepted without further questioning.

Here’s a most difficult question for Sen. Obama to answer:

Voting against the confirmation of Chief Justice John Roberts, you said: Deciding “truly difficult cases” should involve “one’s deepest values, one’s core concerns, one’s broader perspectives on how the world works, and the depth and breadth of one’s empathy.” Is that not essentially how Chief Justice Roger Taney decided the Dred Scott case? Should other factors—say, the language of the constitutional or statutory provision at issue—matter?

Sen. Obama can’t answer that question. If he gave a response, it’d be all nice sounding soundbites which meant nothing.

The more intense the glare of the spotlights shine on Sen. Obama, the more likely it is that he’ll get exposed as a lightweight who isn’t qualified to be president.

I strongly recommend reading the entire column because it’s one of Mr. Will’s finest works.

TechnoratiTechnorati Tags: , , , , , ,

Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • digg

No comments yet.

Leave a comment

Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>