Comments on: On Immigration: The Limbaugh Laws

By: Buy rohypnol.

Buy rohypnol. — Mon, 14 Jul 2008 00:38:22 +0000

Buy rohypnol….

Buy rohypnol….

By: California Conservative » The War against US Border Security

California Conservative » The War against US Border Security — Sat, 22 Apr 2006 19:39:57 +0000

[...] RELATED: A Day without an American, Pt. III On Immigration: The Limbaugh Laws Rethinking The Statue of Liberty Mexicans Make A Run For The Border: What Will Washington Do About It? Immigration Protest in LA: Photo Essay DNC Action Plan: Diversify The â€œDiversityâ€ [...]

By: California Conservative » Media Ignore Mexican Gov’t Brutality of Central American Immigrants

Fri, 21 Apr 2006 18:23:46 +0000

[...] Media Ignore Mexican Gov’t Brutality of Central American Immigrants » Brokeback Mountain 2 » Democrats’ Diminishing Credibility » Kerry‘Thinking Hard’ About Another Run In 2008 For President » Dean: Border Top Priority » Reid’s Support Slipping » Novak: Fitzgerald Knows Leak Source » Hillary Clinton: Bush Caused Katrina » Building A Wall Is Too Expensive? Not If We Hire Illegal Immigrants » Al-Jaafari Steps Aside » Black Business Ownership Rising » Democrats: No Single Message Sums Us Up » A Day Without An American, Pt. III » The Barnes Shakeup » On Immigration: The Limbaugh Laws » DNC Foreign Policy Update: Henry Reid Now Blames Bush For Relying On France and Germany » America, While You Were Sleepingâ€¦ » A Day without an American, Pt. II » Impeachment: Cuttin’ Through The Crap » Michelle Malkin Takes A Stand Against U.C. Santa Cruz Student Thugs List all posts » [...]

By: Elizabeth Bennet

Elizabeth Bennet — Fri, 21 Apr 2006 01:42:17 +0000

Thank you for bringing the hypocrisy of the Mexican government to light!

By: Greg

Greg — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 22:06:26 +0000

I think his point is that the US is being criticized for how ‘badly’ we treat illegals, when, compared to the rest of the world, the opposite is true.

By: seamus

seamus — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 21:16:13 +0000

So is Limbaugh suggesting that Mexico should be a political/governmental model for the US? I don’t think I understand his point.

By: Carlos

Carlos — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:38:58 +0000

To paraphrase Stop Bush!: Stop Bush!’s stupidity knows no bounds.

The SCOTUS is supposed to interpret existing laws of this country based upon the Constitution of the United States. How can you possibly make the jump from that to hypocricy on Limbaugh’s part?

If you criticize the laws, have a solution. My solution would involve making illegals subject to the penalties of law of their own land on our soil. The cowpies don’t deserve protection under the Constitution of the United States under any conditions, and they certainly don’t deserve amnesty (no matter what the horses’ rear ends in D.C. want to call it).

By: California Conservative » A Day without an American, Pt. III

California Conservative » A Day without an American, Pt. III — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 20:07:54 +0000

[...] A Day without an American, Pt. III » The Barnes Shakeup » On Immigration: The Limbaugh Laws » DNC Foreign PolicyUpdate: Henry Reid Now Blames Bush For Relying On France and Germany » America, While You Were Sleepingâ€¦ » A Day without an American, Pt. II » Impeachment: Cuttin’ Through The Crap » Michelle Malkin Takes A Stand Against U.C. Santa Cruz Student Thugs » Rove Refocused » Gossipmongering Masquerading as Reporting » AZ Governor Vetoes Illegal Immigration Bill: The Two Faces of Napolitano » U.S. Generals Call for Resignation of Media Leaders » A Day Without An American » Cindy Sheehan Gets Busted On Her Cardboard Box Story » Tide Turning? » Anti-Military Sentiment in San Francisco Is Nothing New » The Diplomacy Only Party » Terrorist Bombings: Blame The Jews! » An Amigo a Minute » Rumsfeld’s Critics: George Brinton McClellan Lives List all posts » [...]

By: California Conservative

California Conservative — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 19:58:32 +0000

Hey, if there’s any “cherry picking” going on, it’s being done by illegal Mexicans.

Thanks for shopping, Stop Bush!

By: freedom folks

freedom folks — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 18:54:31 +0000

How is this “cherry picking?”

Doesn’t cherry picking imply selecting only one fact out of several to make a point. What are the other facts to which you refer?

By: Stop Bush!

Stop Bush! — Thu, 20 Apr 2006 17:24:32 +0000

Well, for starters, Rush Limbaugh’s hypocrisy knows no bounds. When Sandra Day O’Connor suggested that US courts should take foreign law and precedent into account, she was widely pillaried. The flap was blown way out of proportion, and Rush himself has criticized the Court for relying upon foreign law in making decisions:

It was Justice Kennedy who cited the international rights of the child treaty, a UN treaty that we haven’t even signed, that did form the basis for the majority opinion… It was the thing that cast the difference in this vote [whether it's cruel and unusual punishment to impose the death penalty for a crime that was committed by someone when he was under the age of 21].

– Rush Limbaugh, 4/22/05

So, true to form, distort the truth to rally the base. Bad Mexicans when they cross the border! And look at how they treat immigrants! This is cherry-picking at its Conservative finest.

Has anyone checked into whether Rush’s maid — the one he illegally purchased Oxycontin from — is here legally?