<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pelosi to Unveil Democrat &#8220;Contract on America&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/</link>
	<description>Speaking Out For The Silent Majority (TM)</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 11:09:47 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: California Conservative &#187; UAE Firm To Sell U.S. Ports To Wal-Mart</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-106755</link>
		<dc:creator>California Conservative &#187; UAE Firm To Sell U.S. Ports To Wal-Mart</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Mar 2006 12:58:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-106755</guid>
		<description>[...] * * * Note: Since some readers have experienced confusion* over Scott Ott&#8217;s writings, we point out that this article is satire. For entertainment purposes only. While it may sound like real news, that&#8217;s just because the world is that silly. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] * * * Note: Since some readers have experienced confusion* over Scott Ott&#8217;s writings, we point out that this article is satire. For entertainment purposes only. While it may sound like real news, that&#8217;s just because the world is that silly. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Abi</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105984</link>
		<dc:creator>Abi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Mar 2006 11:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105984</guid>
		<description>Ã¢â‚¬Å“IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m sure the actual ideas and policies will start to flow from there,Ã¢â‚¬Â she said.
Does anyone else find this comment by Pelosi almost laughable? Since when does an unoriginal title for a nonexistant plan instantly creative ideas and policies for a party that obviously can find no unity at all.  I'm not sure who suggested hiring Lakoff, but he obviously is getting paid for not a whole lot of work.  The change in preposition brings no positive connotation as far as I'm concerned and is subtle at best.  I got half way through this article before I even noticed what the difference was.  And though I find all of this somewhat humorous, it does concern me that the Democrats can find no unity on important issues like national security.  Even though I have no doubt that the Republican party will remain the majority this fall, it would be much more comforting to know that the other half of Congress has a plan that isn't based solely on "Bush Bashing".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ã¢â‚¬Å“IÃ¢â‚¬â„¢m sure the actual ideas and policies will start to flow from there,Ã¢â‚¬Â she said.<br />
Does anyone else find this comment by Pelosi almost laughable? Since when does an unoriginal title for a nonexistant plan instantly creative ideas and policies for a party that obviously can find no unity at all.  I&#8217;m not sure who suggested hiring Lakoff, but he obviously is getting paid for not a whole lot of work.  The change in preposition brings no positive connotation as far as I&#8217;m concerned and is subtle at best.  I got half way through this article before I even noticed what the difference was.  And though I find all of this somewhat humorous, it does concern me that the Democrats can find no unity on important issues like national security.  Even though I have no doubt that the Republican party will remain the majority this fall, it would be much more comforting to know that the other half of Congress has a plan that isn&#8217;t based solely on &#8220;Bush Bashing&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ScottJ</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105261</link>
		<dc:creator>ScottJ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:36:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105261</guid>
		<description>Boy, is Rush going to have fun with this tommorrow!

Democrats: Progressively looking backwards.

Democrats: We hated this in 1994, but might work in         
                   2006!

Democrats: Old ideas are good.
                   Old, stolen ideas are even better.

Democrats: They stole the election, so we will steal their        
                    ideas.


Truely pitiful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boy, is Rush going to have fun with this tommorrow!</p>
<p>Democrats: Progressively looking backwards.</p>
<p>Democrats: We hated this in 1994, but might work in<br />
                   2006!</p>
<p>Democrats: Old ideas are good.<br />
                   Old, stolen ideas are even better.</p>
<p>Democrats: They stole the election, so we will steal their<br />
                    ideas.</p>
<p>Truely pitiful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: GoldenBear</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105259</link>
		<dc:creator>GoldenBear</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105259</guid>
		<description>By simply mimicking a Republican idea and changing a preposition, does the Democratic Party really think that's all that's needed to attract voters?  No, ideas and consistency is what people look for.  

Furthermore, just eight months away from November is a little late in the day to finally pull their party together, give them a sense of mission and meaning, and to "inspire some really amazing bumper stickers and buttons."  

I can think of one bumper sticker..."'Contract on America' yeah that sounds like a new idea."  If the Democrats call progress as changing prepositions, I guess we'll have to start calling them the grammar party.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By simply mimicking a Republican idea and changing a preposition, does the Democratic Party really think that&#8217;s all that&#8217;s needed to attract voters?  No, ideas and consistency is what people look for.  </p>
<p>Furthermore, just eight months away from November is a little late in the day to finally pull their party together, give them a sense of mission and meaning, and to &#8220;inspire some really amazing bumper stickers and buttons.&#8221;  </p>
<p>I can think of one bumper sticker&#8230;&#8221;&#8216;Contract on America&#8217; yeah that sounds like a new idea.&#8221;  If the Democrats call progress as changing prepositions, I guess we&#8217;ll have to start calling them the grammar party.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: keith</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105257</link>
		<dc:creator>keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 03:09:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105257</guid>
		<description>Contract on America?  what the hell is this, the Sopranos?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Contract on America?  what the hell is this, the Sopranos?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carlos</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105213</link>
		<dc:creator>Carlos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 2006 01:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105213</guid>
		<description>Lack of direction?  The donkeys have that one covered:  which direction does sewage flow?  Downhill?  That's the only direction they know.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lack of direction?  The donkeys have that one covered:  which direction does sewage flow?  Downhill?  That&#8217;s the only direction they know.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lola</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105050</link>
		<dc:creator>Lola</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 21:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105050</guid>
		<description>"The Ã¢â‚¬ËœContract on AmericaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ says Democrats are progressively leading America onward in a single, inevitable direction.Ã¢â‚¬Â
How will this single, inevitable direction lead to protecting America from future terrorist attacks?  The Democratic party itself cannot present a unified message concerning the War in Iraq.  Some say they support the troops, but not the war - which is impossible to do.  Others say it's time to pull out immediately before we can finish what has been started there.  While others still remain silent or show quiet support.  They continuously try to reach audiences through their criticism of President Bush and his decision to go to war when many of them voted to go there based on the same intelligence.  Does anyone else feel like their stance is all over the map?  I'll be interested to see how they come out with this "unifying direction" despite the lack of any direction for the war on terrorism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The Ã¢â‚¬ËœContract on AmericaÃ¢â‚¬â„¢ says Democrats are progressively leading America onward in a single, inevitable direction.Ã¢â‚¬Â<br />
How will this single, inevitable direction lead to protecting America from future terrorist attacks?  The Democratic party itself cannot present a unified message concerning the War in Iraq.  Some say they support the troops, but not the war - which is impossible to do.  Others say it&#8217;s time to pull out immediately before we can finish what has been started there.  While others still remain silent or show quiet support.  They continuously try to reach audiences through their criticism of President Bush and his decision to go to war when many of them voted to go there based on the same intelligence.  Does anyone else feel like their stance is all over the map?  I&#8217;ll be interested to see how they come out with this &#8220;unifying direction&#8221; despite the lack of any direction for the war on terrorism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Susan</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-105002</link>
		<dc:creator>Susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 16:52:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-105002</guid>
		<description>I'm sorry but Michael Dukakis lost the election to Bush 41 in 1988. If the ideas are to flow, the Bush lied, Bush is Hitler and Bush is evil talk has to stop. We must unite to fight against terrorism and win the war. America depends on it. There is no other way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sorry but Michael Dukakis lost the election to Bush 41 in 1988. If the ideas are to flow, the Bush lied, Bush is Hitler and Bush is evil talk has to stop. We must unite to fight against terrorism and win the war. America depends on it. There is no other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael</title>
		<link>http://www.californiaconservative.org/humor/pelosi-to-unveil-democrat-%e2%80%98contract-on-america%e2%80%99/comment-page-1/#comment-104878</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Mar 2006 15:11:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.californiaconservative.org/?p=2518#comment-104878</guid>
		<description>I may be one of those 'ignorant' conservatives but Contract ON American sounds like a mafia hit to me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I may be one of those &#8216;ignorant&#8217; conservatives but Contract ON American sounds like a mafia hit to me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

