Pelosi Plays the Fool

I’ve repeatedly said that Harry Reid is the most delusional leader that the House or Senate have ever seen. After reading this article in the Hill Magazine, I’m forced to rethink that. It’s possible that Nancy Pelosi may have eclipsed Sen. Reid. Here’s what I’m basing that opinion on:

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA) on Thursday shut the door on expanding oil and gas drilling beyond areas that have already been approved for energy exploration, drawing a clear distinction from her counterparts in charge of the Senate.
“This call for drilling in areas that are protected is a hoax, it’s an absolute hoax on the part of the Republicans and this administration” Pelosi said at her weekly press conference. “It’s a decoy to punt your attention away from the fact that their policies have produced $4-a-gallon gasoline.”
Pelosi’s stand may put her at odds with a growing number of members of the Democratic Caucus who have been moving toward possible compromises with Republicans on ways to expand domestic energy production.
Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) on Wednesday told reporters that expanded offshore drilling is not off the table, and that Democrats will take a look at whether states should be able to choose to drill off their coasts. “I’m not knee-jerk-opposed to anything,” Reid said.

Reid’s signalling that he’s open to increasing exploration, though I suspect that that’s because he knows that Pelosi will stop the bill in the House.

When Ms. Pelosi says that drilling is a hoax, how does she explain the cuban Economic Zone?

As the article points out, Ms. Pelosi is giving vulnerable Democrats reason to worry. They’re finding out that doing nothing isn’t playing well with their constituents. Vulnerable Democrats are thinking that this issue will sink them if they’re seen as doing little or nothing to bring prices down.

Ms. Pelsoi apparently thinks that holding symbolic votes on non-energy energy plans is enough to placate the public. She’s wrong about that. The only thing that’ll satisfy consumers is if production is increased. Consumers know that that’s the only thing that’ll bring prices down quickly.

I’d further point out that it isn’t this administration that’s had trouble keeping prices down. Look at this chart of retail gas prices:

According to this graphic, gas cost between $2.30-2.40 a gallon when Pelosi took over. It also shows that it’s jumped to $4.10 a gallon. Here’s another piece of information that’s worth noting:

WASHINGTON — The average U.S. retail price of unleaded regular gasoline fell sharply last week, dropping more than 12 cents to $2.60 a gallon, the Energy Information Administration (search) said Monday.

The national pump price has tumbled some 32 cents in the past three weeks, but still remains 57 cents a gallon higher than one year ago, according to the EIA’s weekly survey of U.S. service stations.

The drop reflects falling crude oil prices and a decline in gasoline demand as American motorists balked at paying record high prices in September after two hurricanes disrupted supplies.

U.S. crude oil futures ended at $60.32 a barrel Monday, down more than $10 from a peak in late August.

However, diesel fuel prices paid at retail stations rose by nearly a penny to an average $3.16 per gallon, according to the weekly EIA survey. The price remains 95 cents a gallon higher than one year ago.

Energy industry analysts are closely watching oil data to assess if the downturn in use is temporary or represents “demand destruction,” in which high prices trigger longer-lasting changes in oil use by consumers and businesses. The American Petroleum Institute (search) said last week that sharply higher prices in September cut U.S. gasoline demand by nearly 4 percent.

What this tells us is that gas prices experienced some fluctuations related to Katrina and Rita but that they were relatively stable throughout 2005. Compare that with prices shooting up from $2.90-something a gallon in March, 2008 to $4.10 a gallon 4 months later.

I find it just a bit too coincidental that that spike was during the Democrats’ watch.

TechnoratiTechnorati Tags: , , , , , , , ,

Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog

10 Responses to “Pelosi Plays the Fool”

  1. Anneke Says:

    “I find it just a bit too coincidental that that spike was during the Democrats’ watch.”

    While it is an interesting coincidence, the Dems can’t control the spiraling cost of crude. They are, however, opportunists who are happy to exploit the problem to serve their own agenda. I work in Berkeley. I’m losing count of the times colleagues have remarked how wonderful high gas prices are because now people will be forced to: (1) stop driving their cars, (2) take mass transit or ride bikes, and (3) will forsake the burbs for life in transit villages.

  2. Gary Gross Says:

    My condolences to you Anneke. It must be aggravating.

  3. T.A Gray Says:

    So are there any fewer Volvos on driven by thin, bearded guys in Birkenstoks on the 580 and 680 these days?

  4. T.A Gray Says:

    Volvos with faded Kerry stickers that is.

  5. Anneke Says:

    Those bearded men are now driving Prius’s and wearing recycled hemp shoes.

    Oh, and they have nice bright Obama stickers.

  6. Tag Says:

    Dont the Cubans know that we are in charge of the Planet and all oil exploration on it. Are all GOP members this arrogant?? even if it was true (which it is NOT) why would we have ANY SAY on weather they drill off their coast or not.
    Why dont we stop the child like feud with Cuba and send our rigs to their coast?? but they are evil Commies that treat their people bad…Oops, that sounds like most of our allies.

    China is looking into drilling in cuba, NOT in cuban waters.

  7. T.A Gray Says:

    You need to take step or two back, sit down have a beer and count to ten before you explode tag.

  8. T.A Gray Says:

    By the way, if you believe that crap about the nice Cubans letting China drill just on the beach, I have a nice beach front house in Arizona you might like.

  9. Tag Says:

    TA Gray, So, in your arrogant pea sized brain, WE ARE IN CHARGE OF ALL OIL DRILLING on the planet ?? Why not end our childish fight with the Cubans and get permission to drill in their country?? we deal with China, Saudi Arabia, Pakistan, hell we still export to Iran. It really is laughable if you really stop and look at the hypocrisy of the right and the way they use the dumbest among us to get the votes they need to implement their policies of Greed and hate.

  10. Carlos Says:

    Besides having an obviously limited vocabulary and severely limited spelling capabilities, Tag, you are so deprived in basic economics it is nearly pitiful to see you try to argue economics.

    And as for hypocricy, try a taste of liberal-agenda rhetoric for sheer gall and hypocricy, all the way from saving “pristine lands” and “open spaces” to “affordable housing”, “affirmative action” to the “law of unintended consequences” and “we can’t drill our way out of this” to a donkey/jackass prez who would veto a bill authorizing drilling in ANWR 10 years ago because it would be 10 years before a drop of additional oils would be realized.

    Alternative sources of energy is a goal, not a reality. Reality is that people are starving so jackass econazis can feel morally superior to realists because they care about the earth more.

    Hogwash.

Leave a Reply