Democrats: No Single Message Sums Us Up
That’s the actual headline of Liz Sidoti’s AP article. Actually, Ms. Sidoti isn’t the only one saying that.
“It’s not that we don’t stand for anything, it’s that sometimes we stand for everything,” said Barry Rubin, executive director of the Nebraska Democratic Party. Rubin said the stand-for-everything approach invites GOP criticism.
You can’t write stuff this good unless if your name is Scott Ott. It gets better:
Linda Chavez-Thompson, the AFL-CIO’s executive vice president, said one Democratic message will come together. “We’re formulating it now, and that is, we are going to change things in Washington and the Democratic Party has the answer,” she said.
That’s sure got a nice ring to it, doesn’t it? Before they can have an answer, don’t they have to have a clue first?
Then there’s this:
Janice Brunson, a DNC member from Arizona, said the Democratic Party has a clear message for 2006, but she struggled to explain it. “The problem is we don’t have a two- or three-word slogan that pops out,” she said.
Let me offer a clear, concise slogan for these tongue-tied twits: “We’re clueless but we talk smart.”
Cross-post at LetFreedomRingBlog
April 20th, 2006 at 3:25 pm
[...] Cross-posted at California Conservative Categories: Midterm Elections, DNC | [...]
April 21st, 2006 at 12:21 am
I think Barry Rubin was trying to say, “We don’t stand for something so we try to get you to fall for anything.”
If he’d said that, he would have said the first really true thing from a donkey in a long time (Lieberman isn’t a donkey, he’s a DINO).
January 25th, 2009 at 2:36 am
Milf sites….
Milf seeker. Diary of a milf….