Filed Under: Author: Gary Gross, DNC, Elections
It seems that Rahm Emanuel has a problem in achieving his goal of retaking the House for Democrats. Salena Zito’s column offers that proof:
Emanuel is brutally efficient. He understood that House Democrats needed to pick good candidates, frame messages that work locally, develop a superb get-out-the-vote effort and raise money. He knocked on the door of DNC Chairman Howard Dean for that get-out-the-vote money, a door that Dean promptly slammed. Dean has party-building visions for all 50 states; Emanuel has party-winning plans for 21 vulnerable GOP seats. So Emanuel went to Michael Whouley, the man who dealt Dean his stunning Iowa primary loss. Whouley brought that first win home for John Kerry with sheer strategy, and he plans on doing the same for the Democrats’ House candidates in 2006.
Emanuel can’t reach his goal if there are “21 vulnerable GOP seats.” The rule of thumb is that you’re doing better than average if you win 50 percent of the opposition’s vulnerable seats. The ultimate benchmark is 1994, when Republicans won 52 seats. The GOP’s pollsters said at the time that there were roughly 100 vulnerable Democratic seats.
Don’t forget that Democrats have to have a net gain of 15 seats this November. That means they have to offset the seats that they lose, starting with John Murtha’s seat. Winning 16 of the 21 most vulnerable GOP seats is winning eighty percent of the vulnerable seats. It’s understatement to say that I’m skeptical of them achieving that.
There’s another nugget in that paragraph that’s a hindrance to Emanuel’s goal: “He knocked on the door of DNC Chairman Howard Dean for that get-out-the-vote money, a door that Dean promptly slammed.” That won’t get the job done because he had to hire Michael Whouley to do that. That’s money that the DCCC won’t have to fund its candidates.
Couple that with the trend of diminishing Democratic opportunities and you have the recipe for Republicans keeping control of the House. That trend is noticeable if you consider that MN-6 was part of the ‘most-watched’ House races all year but was recently taken off that list. One of the telltale signs to watch for this fall is to see where the top Democrats are going to. That’s what I did in 04. The bigwigs won’t be travelling to districts that they don’t have a serious shot at winning.
I also watched where Kerry was cancelling ad buys. That was a telltale sign that didn’t think he could win that state. Watch for the ever-shrinking map of opportunities. Watch for which party is ‘playing’ on the other’s turf.
Technorati: Rahm Emanuel, DCCC, DNC, Howard Dean, Election 2006
Cross-posted at LetFreedomRingBlog
TrackBack URI for this post:
http://www.californiaconservative.org/elections/a-slip-of-the-tongue/trackback/
[...] Cross-posted at California Conservative Categories: Midterm Elections, House of Representatives, DNC, John Murtha, Dean | [...]
Pingback by Let Freedom Ring » Blog Archive » A Slip of the Tongue? — September 3, 2006 @ 12:27 am
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>
The Wash Post has article today by Balz & Broder saying there are MORE vulnerable Repub seats today, not less. What are your thoughts on that article?
Comment by Kate — September 3, 2006 @ 5:17 am
It gets better; Emanuel has no political organization in our District, except the Mayor’s, and the U. S. Attorney, Patrick Fitzgerald, is prosecuting it’s field marshalls as we speak.
Emanuel also has developed no legislative expertise after two terms, has passed no legislation and because he is at war with GOP leadership can’t even bring home the bacon.
Rahm’s bet his all on winning back Democratic control of Congress. If he fails, he’s through with his party big time.
Will Howard Dean come to his rescue? Is Nancy Pelosi going to find him a cushy committee seat? Not likely.
Emanuel’s vulnerabilities in his home District, because of his national campaigning activities, are the big under reported story of this camapign season.
Comment by Kevin Edward White — September 13, 2006 @ 9:29 pm