Prop. 76: Control Government Spending
Update: FAILED. Voters did not approve.
Should Californians make major Constitutional changes to create an additional state spending limit, grant the governor substantial new power to unilaterally reduce state spending, and revise key provisions relating to Proposition 98, school and community college funding, and transportation funding authorized by Proposition 42?
Proposition 76
State Spending and School Funding Limits
State of California — Initiative Constitutional Amendment
A YES vote on this measure means:
State expenditures would be subject to an additional spending limit based on an average of recent revenue growth. The Governor would be granted new authority to unilaterally reduce state spending during certain fiscal situations. School and community college spending would be more subject to annual budget decisions and less affected by a constitutional funding guarantee.
SmartVoter.org has all the details.
Prop. 76 is the bipartisan solution that forces the state to live within its means:
(via Secretary of State; Analysis)
Here’s what it will do:
- Limits spending to the average rate of tax growth of the past three years, so we don’t overspend in good times followed by huge deficits in bad times.
- Establishes “checks and balances” to encourage the Governor and Legislature to work together. When tax revenue slows, the Legislature can cut wasteful spending to balance the budget. If the Legislature doesn’t act, the Governor can then cut wasteful spending, while protecting funding for education, public safety, and roads.
- Stabilizes K-14 education spending. By cutting wasteful spending and balancing the budget, we’ll have more funds to spend on what the state needs, without raising taxes.
- Stops the autopilot spending binge and holds the politicians accountable.
- Guarantees that taxes dedicated for highways and roads are spent on those projects and never again raided to balance the budget.
Additional voter resources:
Yes on 76: Live Within Our Means Act
joinarnold.com
Governor Schwarzenegger’s Newsroom:
Read the Initiative
Ballot Arguments
Endorsements
News & Editorials
Speeches & Videos
Easy Voter Guide
Since 1996, nonpartisan election information
Legislative Analyst’s Office
Nonpartisan fiscal and policy advisor
How much money is being raised and spent to pass or defeat California propositions and ballot measures, and what are the sources of the money?
California Secretary of State
Check here to follow the money trail.
Search online: Proposition 76
Yahoo! and Google
RELATED:
November 8th: California’s Special Election
and Gov. Schwarzenegger’s Initiatives
San Diego Union-Tribune: Beyond shameless
Ad attacks on Prop. 76 are utterly dishonest
Trackbacks:
November 1st, 2005 at 5:34 pm
[...] November 8th: California’s Special Election and Gov. Schwarzenegger’s Initiatives » Prop. 77: Voter Empowerment » Prop. 76: Control Government Spending » Prop. 75:Paycheck Protection » Prop. 74: Education Reform » What Now?! History Repeats Itself » California Conservatives Must Vote » Babbling Boxer: Fisking The Senator’s Statements on Miers’ Withdrawal » Michelle Malkin’s Unhinged » “Scalito’s Way” — The Alito Nomination: Reactions from the Blogosphere » Confirm Judge Alito » Bush to Nominate Alito to Supreme Court » WHAT ALEX SAID–And Why We Should Listen » MSM Needs A Punch In The Nose » Berlusconi Election: “I Tried to Stop Bush” » Halloween Horror in S. California » LA Unified: Sucking Taxpayers Dry » The Establishment Strikes Back, Part III » Technology Sure to Piss the ACLU Off » Sunnis Signing Up Candidate Lists List all posts » [...]
November 5th, 2005 at 9:33 pm
CA Sp. Election: Prop76 Information
This is a non-partisan, fiscally responsible governmental plan to control state budget spending. Opponents of this measure are primarily attacking it, not on its merits, but in personally attacking the politically vulnerable Governor Arnold Schwarzeneg…
November 8th, 2005 at 4:21 am
[...] Prop. 76 “Arnold’s power grab for unchecked control of the budget.” [...]
November 8th, 2005 at 10:51 am
[...] Schwarzenegger’s Reform Initiatives: Prop. 74: Teacher Tenure/Education Reform Prop. 75: Paycheck Protection Prop. 76: State Spending Limit Prop. 77: Redistricting [...]
May 16th, 2006 at 10:42 am
[...] “Last year, Schwarzenegger tried to address Sacramento’s spending addiction by pushing Proposition 76, which would have limited the growth in state spending, but it failed. This year, apparently, he just wants to win re-election.” [...]