Brian Bilbray Goes Back on His Word
The Club for Growth’s Andy Roth reports:
Elected last week in the special election to replace felon Duke Cunningham in California’s 50th District, Brian Bilbray has cast several votes that seem to contradict what he said while trying to get elected.
From the San Diego Union Tribune:
“Bilbray said problems arise when earmarking is done in secret, so he proposed a ban on earmarks done behind closed doors.â€
And here are some comments he made at a debate:
“I think the first priority is transparency and we passed a lot of laws when I first went to congress in 1995. There is still more to do, not allowing members of congress to put in private so-called earmarks for funding.â€
Despite these strong words to clean up the earmark process, Bilbray promptly voted YES on the T-THUD appropriations bill yesterday, which contained over 1500 earmarks ($), most of which weren’t even in the final bill, but secretly hidden in committee reports.
Plus, he voted NO and NO and NO and NO on each of Jeff Flake’s anti-pork amendments.
Bilbray claims to be a fiscal conservative, but so far he’s off to a bad start.
As Instapundit rightly observes:
“Not very impressive in a guy who’s only been in office for a couple of days. But maybe he’ll do better, now that he realizes people are watching. If not, there’s another election in November.”
Indeed. Wise up, Bilbray. We’re watching.
RELATED:
What Can Conservatives Learn
from the Bilbray Victory?
Busby In Full Retreat
technorati tags: Brian Bilbray, California, CA-50, Pork Busters
June 15th, 2006 at 6:46 pm
Sure and… maybe… monkeys will fly outta my butt.
Who knows.
I think it’s clear that there is about an equal percent chance of either happening.
On the upside though… November is only a few months away, and then Mr. Bilbray will have some ’splainin’ to do.